News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

[tissandtully]

Keeping in mind that Judge Mark Walker has been assigned to the Disney/DeSantis case, this CNN article potentially signals bad news for Disney:

Federal appeals court upholds several voter restrictions enacted by Florida Republicans

Quoting in part:

US District Judge Mark Walker’s ruling, the appeals court said Thursday, was legally and factually flawed. The 11th Circuit also reversed a holding by Walker that would have required Florida to seek federal approval for any future election rule changes that are similar to the provisions he had struck down.​

The Bush/Trump appointees ruled against Walker; the Obama appointee ruled for Walker.

This is why who hears the Disney case on appeal is important.

Eh, conservatives trying to stay in power a bit different than this, which could have the opposite effect, in my uneducated opinion

 

[drnilescrane]

Just something interesting I found looking through the PACER records - they originally drew a Trump judge,
Martin A. Fitzpatrick, who immediately recused himself because of a conflict of interest. It then got reassigned to Mark E. Walker.

 

[mikejs78]

Keeping in mind that Judge Mark Walker has been assigned to the Disney/DeSantis case, this CNN article potentially signals bad news for Disney:

Federal appeals court upholds several voter restrictions enacted by Florida Republicans

Quoting in part:

US District Judge Mark Walker’s ruling, the appeals court said Thursday, was legally and factually flawed. The 11th Circuit also reversed a holding by Walker that would have required Florida to seek federal approval for any future election rule changes that are similar to the provisions he had struck down.​

The Bush/Trump appointees ruled against Walker; the Obama appointee ruled for Walker.

This is why who hears the Disney case on appeal is important.

Yes and no. First, just because they overruled him in this case (an election law case, where liberal and conservative judges have very different ideas), it doesn't mean they will on a contracts law case or a 1A case, especially where corporations are involved. The 11th circuit also upheld Judge Walker's injunction on the Stop Woke Act, which was decided by one Clinton judge and two Trump judges. So I don't think this particular ruling is instructive on how the 11th circuit will rule.

 

[Touchdown]

Keeping in mind that Judge Mark Walker has been assigned to the Disney/DeSantis case, this CNN article potentially signals bad news for Disney:

Federal appeals court upholds several voter restrictions enacted by Florida Republicans

Quoting in part:

US District Judge Mark Walker’s ruling, the appeals court said Thursday, was legally and factually flawed. The 11th Circuit also reversed a holding by Walker that would have required Florida to seek federal approval for any future election rule changes that are similar to the provisions he had struck down.​

The Bush/Trump appointees ruled against Walker; the Obama appointee ruled for Walker.

This is why who hears the Disney case on appeal is important.

I don’t think you are grasping things correctly, most conservative judges are called originalists, they view the constitution through a lens of what the founders intended. Contract clause in the constitution is extremely direct and leaves little wiggle room. They have also traditionally been pro business and anti government regulation. Expecting Bush appointees to change their stripes seems unlikely. Even most Trump appointees hold these views.

 

[Chip Chipperson]

I'm specifically requesting that no news drop today after the close of the NYSE, because I'll be in a guitar lesson and unable to respond.

Hopefully nothing happens that causes you to break your G string.

 

[Vacationeer]

I'm specifically requesting that no news drop today after the close of the NYSE, because I'll be in a guitar lesson and unable to respond.

Awesome! Tell me you’re learning that song from Tears for Fears

 

[Tha Realest]

I'm specifically requesting that no news drop today after the close of the NYSE, because I'll be in a guitar lesson and unable to respond.

I can’t be the only one that now wants to hear you play acoustic bumper music for the podcast

 

[mikejs78]

I'm specifically requesting that no news drop today after the close of the NYSE, because I'll be in a guitar lesson and unable to respond.

Well, considering what happened the last time you asked for something not to happen, I'm expecting some huge earth shattering news this evening....

 

[lazyboy97o]

This guy is flat out not smart, I don’t care where he graduated from he is being sued.

Eh, being sued doesn’t really mean anything. In certain jobs you’re pretty much guaranteed to be sued and governor of a state is one of those. I’d probably be more worried if a governor wasn’t being sued.

 

[Prince-1]

I'm specifically requesting that no news drop today after the close of the NYSE, because I'll be in a guitar lesson and unable to respond.

See you just jinxed yourself. Don't be surprised to hear that a volcano opened up in the middle of Main Street during your lesson.

 

[networkpro]

There's an interesting dissection of Disney's suit on Youtube by the Legal Mindset channel who actually has a specialization in Florida Special District and real property law and has practiced as such. He brings up the point that if it's Disney, not the former district, that is asserting this as a First Amendment case that due to the disclosures on the bond debt they are committing securities fraud. Disney, in its filing, admits that the replacement for RCID is the current legal authority for that district.

The matter of the Bonds is what will cause Disney the most problems in the legal court system, not the court of public opinion where anything can bring up as "evidence" and shills can pump out as many "ground swell opinion pieces" as funds as made available to produce and publish them.

 

[Surferboy567]

Eh, being sued doesn’t really mean anything. In certain jobs you’re pretty much guaranteed to be sued and governor of a state is one of those. I’d probably be more worried if a governor wasn’t being sued.

No, that is not what I am saying.

He is being sued, he should not keep saying things to make himself look more guilty. The ship has sailed on that I guess.

 

[lazyboy97o]

There's an interesting dissection of Disney's suit on Youtube by the Legal Mindset channel who actually has a specialization in Florida Special District and real property law and has practiced as such. He brings up the point that if it's Disney, not the former district, that is asserting this as a First Amendment case that due to the disclosures on the bond debt they are committing securities fraud. Disney, in its filing, admits that the replacement for RCID is the current legal authority for that district.

The matter of the Bonds is what will cause Disney the most problems in the legal court system, not the court of public opinion where anything can bring up as "evidence" and shills can pump out as many "ground swell opinion pieces" as funds as made available to produce and publish them.

The guy we’ve already laughed at several time before? Who overstates his credentials and gets basic facts wrong?

 

[Prince-1]

There's an interesting dissection of Disney's suit on Youtube by the Legal Mindset channel who actually has a specialization in Florida Special District and real property law and has practiced as such. He brings up the point that if it's Disney, not the former district, that is asserting this as a First Amendment case that due to the disclosures on the bond debt they are committing securities fraud. Disney, in its filing, admits that the replacement for RCID is the current legal authority for that district.

The matter of the Bonds is what will cause Disney the most problems in the legal court system, not the court of public opinion where anything can bring up as "evidence" and shills can pump out as many "ground swell opinion pieces" as funds as made available to produce and publish them.

Listening to a Youtube lawyer is almost as good as taking advice from Disney bus drivers.

 

[Prince-1]

The guy we’ve already laughed at several time before? Who overstates his credentials and gets basic facts wrong?

I wonder what his accuracy rate is in predicting all things related to Disney??

 

[GBAB1973]

There's an interesting dissection of Disney's suit on Youtube by the Legal Mindset channel who actually has a specialization in Florida Special District and real property law and has practiced as such. He brings up the point that if it's Disney, not the former district, that is asserting this as a First Amendment case that due to the disclosures on the bond debt they are committing securities fraud. Disney, in its filing, admits that the replacement for RCID is the current legal authority for that district.

The matter of the Bonds is what will cause Disney the most problems in the legal court system, not the court of public opinion where anything can bring up as "evidence" and shills can pump out as many "ground swell opinion pieces" as funds as made available to produce and publish them.

When this guy called those who support Disney "simps", he pretty much outed himself here.

 

[mikejs78]

There's an interesting dissection of Disney's suit on Youtube by the Legal Mindset channel who actually has a specialization in Florida Special District and real property law and has practiced as such. He brings up the point that if it's Disney, not the former district, that is asserting this as a First Amendment case that due to the disclosures on the bond debt they are committing securities fraud. Disney, in its filing, admits that the replacement for RCID is the current legal authority for that district.

The matter of the Bonds is what will cause Disney the most problems in the legal court system, not the court of public opinion where anything can bring up as "evidence" and shills can pump out as many "ground swell opinion pieces" as funds as made available to produce and publish them.

The guy we’ve already laughed at several time before? Who overstates his credentials and gets basic facts wrong?

Yeah, that guy has not been right about anything regarding this case since it started a year ago....

 

[UNCgolf]

There's an interesting dissection of Disney's suit on Youtube by the Legal Mindset channel who actually has a specialization in Florida Special District and real property law and has practiced as such. He brings up the point that if it's Disney, not the former district, that is asserting this as a First Amendment case that due to the disclosures on the bond debt they are committing securities fraud. Disney, in its filing, admits that the replacement for RCID is the current legal authority for that district.

The matter of the Bonds is what will cause Disney the most problems in the legal court system, not the court of public opinion where anything can bring up as "evidence" and shills can pump out as many "ground swell opinion pieces" as funds as made available to produce and publish them.

You shouldn't trust anything that guy says. It's wildly skewed political opinions; not actual legal analysis.

 

[sblank]

The guy we’ve already laughed at several time before? Who overstates his credentials and gets basic facts wrong?

Yeah, anyone who takes this wannabe Cernovich seriously needs to realize that they're a mark.

 

[Touchdown]

You shouldn't trust anything that guy says. It's wildly skewed political opinions; not actual legal analysis.

Going to post the same thing after visiting his YouTube page.