BUT, I can imagine and assume scenarios where Disney does the necessary inspections overnight when the parks are closed…beams are not being used the monorail cars are all in their service bays and storage areas. I can’t imagine ANY scenarios where state inspectors would be on property before 9 am or after 5 pm to conduct their inspections.
But a state inspector doing their job in the overnight hours ? Doubt it.
You can't have findings without evidence. What you're reading are allegations of the Board, which taken as true, support the action they are asking counsel to take.
That will be next…DeSantis will send in FWC agents/rangers/police to perform inspections on all the marine vehicles on property…
DeSantis doesn't read the law when a company that employs more than 1K staff and has their own safety ride inspectors are exempt from state inspections ( ie WDW, Uni, SW ). State inspectors generally work business hours unless need to do their roles at night.
Seriously? If the intent was to do inspections in good faith then why not just pass a law that covers all fixed rail transit systems in the state? Why carve out special districts that cover more than one county? I think the answer is obvious. There’s no reason to even consider for a second that these inspections would be done in good faith.
You think the state will pay inspectors overtime so as to not inconvenience WDW to perform those inspections? That kinda defeats the whole DeSantis modus operandi…
Of course, but his ultimate goal is to make corporate life as difficult as possible for the mouse…
Right, I just don’t think the title has any particular added significance. I don’t doubt there is evidence either. I have not gone back to do a more thorough read, but as I said previously, I didn’t notice much in the way of referencing the original District charter which was state law at the time. I find that peculiar and it makes me doubt the conclusions because we know the charter had a clause regarding subsequent state laws.
I agree. Right now if the district declares the existing contract void in a public meeting that’s meaningless. If the legislature passes the bill allowing districts to void existing contracts then the district will have the legal authority to void the contract. At that point Disney would need to challenge the bill itself or the voiding of their specific contract or both. I agree that as a contract dispute this is a much better position for Disney.
Disney already employs qualified inspectors.
I think this whole thing is stupid but I do have to wonder how so many problems over the past few years (doors opening, frequent breakdowns, etc) got past the “qualified inspectors”. Maybe this is the one silver lining which will come out of this whole inane thing. Also wouldn’t everyone just prefer them to replace the monorails with the sky liner at this point?
