I thought one of the amendments was to void any contract made prior to a certain date, or am I not remembering that correctly? I also thought that the amendment giving them the ability to review and void a contract was part of a different amendment, wasn't it? So hard to keep track of what they are doing.
That's the intent.
No, but many of them assume a large number of the people who are using it are frauds and faking or just lazy and then use that to "scare" people into thinking the whole thing is a disaster that must be gutted.
That was my point. They keep talking up "monorail inspections" like it's some sort of threat when the monorail is far from the only option to get from place to place in WDW.
I would think so, since getting g the law itself declared unconstitutional would negate the Board's ability to void it. I suppose it's possible that the Board would try to fall back on its other arguments for voiding the contract, though, so Disney may end up having to fight it on both fronts anyway. I'm sure that's exactly what the governor and his cronies want - to make it as difficult and expensive as possible for Disney. Even if both the State and Board lose, he'll convince himself that he won by creating the headache in the first place.
Four resorts? The only resorts on the monorail loop are Contempo, GF, and Poly. FW & WL already use buses along with water taxis. In addition, GF and Poly also have water taxi docks. So the only place buses would be an absolute necessity would be Contempo, but then only for those unable or unwilling to walk the very short distance to MK. Transportation from the resorts to parks other than MK is already done by bus.
Bay Lake is the DVC wing of the Contemporary, not a separate resort.
But it’s also sort of like other recent legislation in Florida and elsewhere because of the way it shifts the actions of enforcement away from the state itself. The harm isn’t caused by the law itself, it’s caused by the actions of the board.
The full name is "Bay Lake Tower at Disney's Contemporary Resort"
The full name is "Bay Lake Tower at Disney's Contemporary Resort"
Regardless... you're focusing on the semantics of what is or isn't a resort and completely ignoring the point I made that, for most guests of the Contemporary (including those at BLT), the 10-minute walk to MK would be a perfectly viable option. If given the choice between a short walk, or standing around waiting for a bus, which do think most guests would choose? I really don't see how loss of the monorail would be as disruptive as you seem to think it would be. There has been monorail downtime before, and they've managed.
It literally isn't.
Whomever decided on that name back in 2009 has caused untold misery for everybody over the last 15 years.
Bay lake is the “fourth resort”?
