Tha Realest
Well-Known Member
I agree it depends on 1) whether SOG was “carved out” of the property description in the DA (and whether thats availing or controlling), and 2) whether property carved out from the description could be viewed as “affected.” In the instance of this road development project that’s cutting off pedestrian access to Poly/TTC, this property is definitely being affected. My point was whether future developments under the act could be similarly viewed as affecting those other properties.I believe the Department of Defense does now own the land as well. If you look at the Orange County Interactive Mapping I believe they’re listed as the owner. They don’t appear on the property tax rolls because the feds don’t pay property taxes. It’s a weird arrangement because Disney still owns the golf facilities which still exist under the lobby and hotel offices.
It all comes down to the definition of “affected”. The land development agreement only applies to Disney. The Department of Defense also already has its own agreements where Disney controls their development at the site with any changes to the exterior having to go through Disney for approval. Any hotel expansion would also go through Disney. So are they affected since nothing is changing for them?