Meanwhile there’s still a fuel shortage in Ft. Lauderdale
I saw that. Same in Miami.
The historic Ft. Lauderdale City Hall has been so damaged by floodwaters it is unsafe to occupy.
Meanwhile there’s still a fuel shortage in Ft. Lauderdale
We planned on it.…liar
You were in the annual pass lightning lane
….pssst…Miami and Ft. Lauderdale are the same placeI saw that. Same in Miami.
The historic Ft. Lauderdale City Hall has been so damaged by floodwaters it is unsafe to occupy.
This is far from over.
Why would Disney roll over and take this they have many grievances they can take up with the courts.
That's the playbook when you're judging the cost of going to trial is more than any award you might get.Because they want this out of the news as soon as possible.
Disney does not like going to court. If the other news of this week wasn't a tip off: no matter how right you are morally, or what kind of rock-hard solid legal case you might have, you always try to settle to avoid going to court.
And yet, they're not.That's the playbook when you're judging the cost of going to trial is more than any award you might get.
Or if you want to avoid harsher jail time.
If the other news of this week wasn't a tip off: no matter how right you are morally, or what kind of rock-hard solid legal case you might have, you always try to settle to avoid going to court.
They're waiting for Gov and Friends to actually do something that would be deemed illegal rather than just say it. Immediate injunction time.And yet, they're not.
What's your theory?
Eventually this almost certainly ends up in court, but what we got yesterday was nothing more than a political speech. No actions have been taken yet and no actual harm is done (legal harm based on the district not honoring the contract they freely entered into). Once the district stops Disney from doing something allowed in the contract they sue. If the district follows through on threats like selling or developing land if that violates the agreement they sue. Ultimately a judge will decide if the Contract is valid or not. The board and the legislature cannot just declare the contract void (I mean they can say that but it has no legal basis).That's the playbook when you're judging the cost of going to trial is more than any award you might get.
Or if you want to avoid harsher jail time.
They’re in a bit of uncharted water here…And yet, they're not.
What's your theory?
And yet, they're not.
What's your theory?
My take is they can’t predict the courts. Gee…wonder why?They're waiting for Gov and Friends to actually do something that would be deemed illegal rather than just say it. Immediate injunction time.
Until they act illegally, Gov and Gang can claim First Amendment rights to just sound off with hyperbole. And such political speech tends to get a pass by SCOTUS.
And the longer they can string this out, the better for Gov to be gone campaigning for Prez or term-limited. Which means holding off legal suits until the bitter end and until absolutely needed.
They're waiting for Gov and Friends to actually do something that would be deemed illegal rather than just say it.
Wait wait wait.They're waiting for Gov and Friends to actually do something that would be deemed illegal rather than just say it.
Lots.So nothing illegal has occurred yet?
Because they want this out of the news as soon as possible.
Disney does not like going to court. If the other news of this week wasn't a tip off: no matter how right you are morally, or what kind of rock-hard solid legal case you might have, you always try to settle to avoid going to court.
They do.Wait wait wait.
I was assured that they had an ironclad First Amendment claim because these actions were INDSISPUTABLY retaliatory for their speech?
But nothing that can be called 'harm' yet, e.g., they haven't held up a building permit until TBA is reverted back to Splash. Yet.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.