One of the articles I read talked about a special tax district for the fire department, they made it sound like Disney would be accessed new taxes for certain services like the fire department. I’m not positive I understood it 100% though, the whole thing is very confusing.
It’s almost like this is a Disney Parks fan site or somethin’.
Don't get me started on the Eastpoint Water and Sewer District!
Remember the good old days when the most controversial drama surrounding the Disney Parks was the Splash Mountain retheme? 2020 was such an innocent time.
There are a variety of precedents for special allocation and improvement districts. The current legislation does not handle this so any solutions are hypothetical and would still have to be implemented. There are also issues of how much counties can do on their own and the need for state involvement for a cross-county solution.
Examples of this kid unfriendly entertainment?
How is punishing political speech an example of tolerance?
It is not, as soon as a moderator sees it 90% of the comments on the last twenty pages will instantly vanish.
That or just keep it as it is, it seems like it’s worked well for 50 years and both WDW and Florida have benefited from it.
Arguably, if Chapek had just rested on that statement he issued, took some heat, and left it at that, this would’ve all blown over. The overcompensation after the poor reception of that statement was what provoked the Florida legislature, and here we are.
What is happening in our politically divided world today?! Who does this benefit? I'm no fan of the Woke movement but "Government as Mafia saying 'Nice business you got there - be a shame if something happened to it.'" is not the answer.I would argue that the only public statements that Disney needs to make are quarterly earninngs reports. Disney should not "ever" discuss "any" social issues that the rest of the world debates. They should say "no comment" to almost "every" social problem in this world.
I missed the T this time, I almost always write LGB or lgbt for several reasons… 1) I’m too lazy to write out the alphabet, 2) in college I worked at a restaurant that hosted the lgbt club (that’s all it was in the 90s) so that’s familiar to me and I can’t remember the half dozen other letters, and 3) after T I find it redundant, it becomes subgroups of the primary groups.
Perhaps not. But I'm talking about the everyday debates we hear today. Very few people are debating gay marriage today. Even fewer are trying to actually write legislation related to it. The political debate is all centered on the TQIA+ portion at this time. And I think that's where the arguments move well beyond simply recognizing or opposing people's rights.
