Californian Elitist
Well-Known Member
Sexual orientation = your sexual desires, aka talking about who you want to have sex with. The lie you are pushing is that its ok to talk about who you like to sleep with to little kids.
Sexual orientation = your sexual desires, aka talking about who you want to have sex with. The lie you are pushing is that its ok to talk about who you like to sleep with to little kids.
Totally off topic but if one showed at my local shelter it wouldn't be there long
It’s not surprising that people here aren’t interested in the economic impact because the person/people who called for the creation of this bill weren’t interested in the economic impact. Unfortunately the economic impact is a side effect of the bill and not the driving force behind it.I thought everyone would be most interested in the economic impact of this legislation (as in money / taxes) but I see the threads discussion has meandered off into the swamps.
" According to Orange County Tax Collector Scott Randolph. He added that there would be zero fiscal gain for the county. “If that district goes away, it is zero revenue, but they take on all the debt and all the obligation,” Randolph said that financial obligation is about $105 million a year to operate services in Reedy Creek. For example, the district runs its own fire department, sewer services and handles all the road maintenance. Additionally, Randolph said the county would also be taking on, potentially, $1 billion to $2 billion in bond debt. If the county is absorbing additional costs from Reedy Creek, Randolph said the money is going to have to come from somewhere. “If Reedy Creek is dissolved, my guess would be Orange County would have to raise property taxes 15 to 20%; now that’s not your whole tax bill, right, because your tax bill involves school and other things, but your Orange County government portion of your tax bill will probably have to go up 15 to 20% to take on that cost,” he said."
Barney is confused, my child.Mommy, why does Barney look so mad?
I have a friend who has 2 of the most gorgeous Poms ever.Totally off topic but if one showed at my local shelter it wouldn't be there long
All the willful ignorance in this thread is hilarious.
Can you shed any light on why the counties would be forced to assume the RCID's debts and functions in the event of it being dissolved, yet not be entitled to the future/additional tax revenue which had been paid to RCID in the past for those same functions? If I'm not mistaken, that is the position that the OC Tax Collector has taken.
*Any answer is pro-bono.
Because they’re completely separate taxes created by a completely separate entity. The counties already get their full property taxes as assessed. A portion of the county taxes are not diverted to the District.Can you shed any light* on why the counties would be forced to assume the RCID's debts and functions in the event of it being dissolved, yet not be entitled to the future/additional tax revenue which had been paid to RCID in the past for those same functions? If I'm not mistaken, that is the position that the OC Tax Collector has taken, but that strikes me as odd.
*Any answer is pro-bono.
I have a friend who has 2 of the most gorgeous Poms ever.
Lake Buena Vista and Bay Lake Fire Departments?So what happens if Orange County doesn’t want to pay for multiple fire departments?
YESYou are talking about dogs aren’t ya?
Yeah, we wouldn't even be talking about the potential removal of the Reedy Creek Improvement District if Disney hadn't opposed the bill in the first place.They are very much related.
In that case, I would imagine that the counties would have to somehow leverage a deal wherein Disney starts forking over similar amounts to what they were paying RCID. It would be unreasonable to expect the counties to take on all that debt and increased operating expenses without any additional tax revenue.Because they’re completely separate taxes created by a completely separate entity. The counties already get their full property taxes as assessed.
As of right now, dumping it on the counties is the plan, which is why these statements are being made. And it’s not just the plan for Orange and Osceola counties but any other county which has an affected special district.In that case, I would imagine that the counties would have to somehow leverage a deal wherein Disney starts forking over similar amounts to what they were paying RCID. It would be unreasonable to expect the counties to take on all that debt and increased operating expenses without any additional tax revenue.
Though admittedly, I am not familiar with Florida tax/administrative law, so it may be perfectly legal to dump that all on the counties without any additional revenue. The law doesn't always necessarily line up with what is reasonable or fair.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.