You don't need to explain to me the idea of a representative republic.... I too took high school civics. But the that idea still does not support what you said.
You were trying to claim that the actions of DeSantis and the legislators are or match "the vast majority of floridia voters".
"DeSantis is simply the RESULT of the wants and ecpectations of the voting public!"
"Agree or disagree with Florida's voters....I get that it might be hard to accept...but the votes for these people show a CLEAR thought-pattern of the majoroty of Florida voters."
The real facts
- Just because someone votes for someone doesn't mean they believe or support every action that person will take after they are elected
- A vast majority of voters don't even vote for an individual, but vote for a party's nominee. So they vote for 'their team' -- not the things that one person may represent or do
- The entire topic of retailation against Disney WAS NOT PART OF THE GOP PLATFORM during the last elections. So you can't say everyone who voted for the GOP were showing their wants or agreement with these actions
- Once elected, the individual is free to do whatever they want independent of the people that elected them... only facing the music in 2-4 years during the next election.
So you can't use the simple fact to that these people have been elected to mean their actions match "the vast majority of Florida" wants on these decisions. Electing them was not a vote of confidence on a topic THAT DIDN'T EVEN EXIST at the time.
Which is why you were challenged to support your assertion. Instead you're just pointing at they were elected... wheeeee... you gonna claim every elected official that did something self-serving or illegal was also doing the will of the people? I mean.. they were elected right??
You expect your representatives to reflect the will of their constituents, but it is not a direct, or even required thing. And these days they will represent their PARTY before their constituients.
Naive...
No, I'm sticking to rational arguments that do not overreach what the facts actually support.