Generally, “affected property owners” would apply to all property owners adjacent to the property subject to the development agreement potentially even those outside of the district if their property is adjacent to/within 300 feet.
That would still happen the moment Disney corporate did anything that the base would consider woke. It would be all the proof they need that in the long run "Disney won." Pride events at either US park? Didn't do enough. DEI hiring initiatives? Didn't do enough. Movies / TV / Attractions featuring characters and stories they don't like? Didn't do enough. DeSantis got himself into a no win situation, because ultimately he will be judged by the base by whatever product Disney continues to put out. The only way he can not be a loser is to keep up the pretense of the fight. Like we've seen after 2020, and in AZ now.
Short answer is that it doesn’t look like the Supreme Court has overturned either decision — i.e., neither one has been superseded.
Disney pushing popcorn buckets the past year has finally been explained.
The agreement represents zoning and regulations that have existed for years. It’s not a change. If I buy land adjacent to land zoned for a nuclear power plant then it’s not exactly a surprise when a nuclear power plant is built. Same goes if it is zoned for a cell phone tower. It’s even less of a change when it’s existing development that’s going to remain as is.
If RCID did not mail notices, I’m sure that will be Disney’s argument. They’ll argue that no changes were made to the allowed usage of the land and therefore the adjacent property owners were not affected.
And as I said, there was also an exception for notices in the original charter if the affected landowners of a Board of Supervisors decision provide written consent.
Doesn't matter. The only resolution where some pundit, commentator, that guy, or some other ad doesn't frame Ron as loosing is one where he get's direct control over some Disney content. Where Ron is able to punish Disney for releasing something or get them to not release it. Anything else will be to small for enough of a group reporting it that the base will see it as a loss. The goal was set and now he's stuck with it.
If it’s bad business they will find out from their customers. The government has no business taking action.
They pursued this “clever maneuver” when the plan was for the district to be dissolved
Why do you think that? There's a huge group that doesn't care either way about the comments and some that disagree with Disney but kind of like that freedom of speech thing.
What difference would it make? This new bill to void the contract goes back 3 months but they could have said a year if the contract was signed this time last year.
Yeah, the writing was on the wall by that point, and they screwed up by not pursuing it in the courts. Still can, I presume. Will they?
