Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
This thread is turning out to be more entertaining than the Coronavirus thread!
No kidding. Lots of people worked up over this. I’m gonna need some more popcorn.This thread is turning out to be more entertaining than the Coronavirus thread!
View attachment 697685
You haven’t presented anything except your opinions of the governor and the legislature. You offer no evidence to back up your accusations and can’t prove any intent to deny Disney their 1A rights through State actions.Oh please. You’ve ignored me and everyone else when we’ve challenged your belief here and have refused to supply precedent to validate your opinion.
Where is your evidence? Why won’t you cite this major precedent?You haven’t presented anything except your opinions of the governor and the legislature. You offer no evidence to back up your accusations and can’t prove any intent to deny Disney their 1A rights through State actions.
In the end it’s all a thought exercise because now that Disney has gone along with this, it indicates that they believed they would have better luck negotiating this in the legislature than adjudicating this the courts.
It’s over.
That is one way to look at it. I certainly took something else away from the whole thing.Disney only cares about their bottom line. This entire ordeal has been a major self inflicted error in their part.
They have painfully learned that politics and theme parks don’t mix. So now that the activist element has been sidelined, both sides appear to have come to terms and can both save face, and expect that nanosecond attention span of the professional outrage class on the internet will put this in the rear view mirror.
It’s amazing to learn that in every case where the courts ruled against the government regarding freedom of speech that it was all because the lawyers forgot to say “That’s not what they meant.”
I don't care who declares victory - This seems good to me -DeSantis Declares Victory, but Disney World Keeps Many Perks
The Florida governor gained control of a board that oversees some services at the resort, while Disney maintained a special tax district.
By Brooks Barnes Feb. 10, 2023Updated 5:59 p.m. ET
Gov. Ron DeSantis gained control on Friday of a five-member Florida board that oversees development and safety services at Walt Disney World, a move that restricts Disney’s autonomy but leaves in place perks enjoyed by the company as part of a 56-year-old special tax district.
Last year, at the urging of Mr. DeSantis, the Florida Legislature revoked Disney World’s designation as a special tax district — a privilege that effectively allowed the company to self-govern its 25,000-acre theme park complex.
“I will not allow a woke corporation based in California to run our state,” Mr. DeSantis said at the time. “Disney has gotten away with special deals from the State of Florida for way too long.” Disney, which is Florida’s largest private employer, had paused political donations in the state and defied Mr. DeSantis by condemning an education law that opponents call “Don’t Say Gay.” It prohibits discussion about sexual orientation and gender identity through the third grade and limits it for older students.
The problem: The abolishment of the district — set for June 1 — would require taxpayers in two counties to pick up the tab for Disney World services like fire protection, policing and road maintenance. Under the old setup, Disney paid for those costs. The district also carried roughly $1 billion in debt, which would be transferred to the counties.
So the Legislature tried again, taking up a new Disney World measure in a special session that started on Monday. This time, Disney would be allowed to keep the special tax district and almost all its perks, including the ability to issue tax-exempt bonds and approve development plans without scrutiny from certain local regulators. But Disney would no longer be able to appoint the five members of the tax district’s board. Florida’s governor would get to do that.
The bill passed the State House on Thursday and the State Senate on Friday. Mr. DeSantis claimed victory earlier in the week. “There’s a new sheriff in town,” he said.
Mr. DeSantis has relished campaigning and fund-raising against what he calls “woke” corporations — chiefly Disney but also, over the past couple of years, the National Collegiate Athletic Association and Ben and Jerry’s — as well as certain math textbooks and the former top prosecutor in Tampa, whom Mr. DeSantis removed from office. Last year, he signed the Stop WOKE Act, a law that limits the teaching of aspects of racism and other history in schools and workplaces.
Before the special session, Disney hoped that it would retain the ability to appoint at least a couple of the board members.
“For more than 50 years, the Reedy Creek Improvement District has operated at the highest standards,” Jeff Vahle, Disney World’s president, said in a statement, noting that the resort has been able to grow into “one of the largest economic contributors” in Florida because of the district. “We are focused on the future and are ready to work within this new framework.”
The board makeup is important because members vote on Disney World development efforts, like building a new hotel or access road or an additional theme park. The worry is that a politicized board could delay or even block such plans. (Blocking development efforts and associated job growth is not something Florida’s Republicans are known for doing, however.)
The board does not have the power to dictate the content that Disney offers to its customers.
Disney World is already extensively developed, lessening the potential impact. The complex includes four theme parks; an outdoor shopping mall; a 220-acre basketball, soccer, volleyball, lacrosse, baseball and competitive cheer complex; and 18 Disney-owned hotels with 24,000 rooms. The complex attracts an estimated 50 million visitors annually.
The tax district’s comprehensive plan, which was recently updated and approved, already gives Disney the ability to build a fifth theme park, two additional water parks and thousands of hotel rooms on 850 acres. (The company has indicated no plans to do so.) The plan extends until 2032.
Along with putting the board in the hands of political appointees, the measure changed the tax district’s name to the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District. Disney will also be barred from building a nuclear power plant or an airport at the resort — things that were never on its to-do list anyway.
Florida has hundreds of similar special tax districts. One covers the Villages, a colossal senior-living community north of Orlando. Another covers Daytona International Speedway and the surrounding area.
DeSantis Declares Victory as Disney Is Stripped of Some 56-Year-Old Perks
The Legislature approved a bill that restricts the autonomy of Florida’s largest private employer over a fight involving the teaching of sexual orientation and gender identity.www.nytimes.com
I guess you were aware of it then? I did as you requested and now you’re pretending that I didn’t.It’s amazing how nobody has ever mentioned any of these other motivations. Even you can’t come up with a reason and instead can only whine that people are mentioning facts you don’t like.
I wish Disney would stop all political donations. I know I'm being idealistic, but the whole thing leaves a very bad taste in my mouth.Are people just as offended when they have favors done or special treatment when they give money to those politicians?
Or is that ok? Genuine question. Some people see the reciprocity and bribe as just a wording difference, I guess because it is an incentive and not a promise officially it does not bother people as much, but that is what it is.
Wording always matters is how I see this one.
Iger - WINNERThis exchange reminds me of Peltz declaring victory... It's a victory because I say so.. I'm out!
The WDW Guest was losing way before this debacleIger - WINNER
DeSantis - WINNER
Peltz - WINNER
WDW - LOSER
WDW Guest - Probably LOSER
Chapek - VERY RICH SUPER LOSER
Absolutely correct - Fixed it -The WDW Guest was losing way before this debacle
Spot on with chapek tho haha
"Um, but you know, you did have the situation with our Parents Rights in Education Bill. And the thing is, is, you know, when you're doing some of this stuff, you know, what happens with leftists and media, they like to distort, they like to create false narratives. Um, for whatever reason, Disney got on that bandwagon, they demagogued the bill, they lied about it, whatever, came out against it. . . . And I'm just thinking to myself, you're a corporation based in Burbank, California, and you're gonna marshal your economic might to attack the parents of my state? Uh, we view that as a provocation and we're going to fight back against that. But honestly, even in spite of that, um, if none of that had happened, uh, this is the right thing to do. Just on the basis of those Zoom videos that you saw. . . . These are videos of very high up people in this corporation in Disney, and they're talking about their intentional agenda to inject sexuality and the programming that's provided to our youngest kids . . . . I'm just not comfortable having that type of, of, of agenda get special treatment in my state. I just can't do it. And so, and so the bill here sets the marker."
—Ron DeSantis, April 2022
(The transcript is automatically generated so may contain a couple of errors, but you can watch the video for yourself.)
Reedy Creek reassuring investors after DeSantis signs law dissolving special district
The Reedy Creek Improvement District is reassuring investors after Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill that will dissolve the special district.www.wesh.com
The most revealing thing is that even after he says that "if none of that [i.e., Disney's opposition to the bill] had happened, uh, this is the right thing to do", the reasons he gives all have to do with Disney's "agenda". Here he is, plain as day, telling us in multiple ways that his intent is to punish Disney for being too "woke". Why are people not taking him at his word?"Um, but you know, you did have the situation with our Parents Rights in Education Bill. And the thing is, is, you know, when you're doing some of this stuff, you know, what happens with leftists and media, they like to distort, they like to create false narratives. Um, for whatever reason, Disney got on that bandwagon, they demagogued the bill, they lied about it, whatever, came out against it. . . . And I'm just thinking to myself, you're a corporation based in Burbank, California, and you're gonna marshal your economic might to attack the parents of my state? Uh, we view that as a provocation and we're going to fight back against that. But honestly, even in spite of that, um, if none of that had happened, uh, this is the right thing to do. Just on the basis of those Zoom videos that you saw. . . . These are videos of very high up people in this corporation in Disney, and they're talking about their intentional agenda to inject sexuality and the programming that's provided to our youngest kids . . . . I'm just not comfortable having that type of, of, of agenda get special treatment in my state. I just can't do it. And so, and so the bill here sets the marker."
—Ron DeSantis, April 2022
(The transcript is automatically generated so may contain a couple of errors, but you can watch the video for yourself.)
Reedy Creek reassuring investors after DeSantis signs law dissolving special district
The Reedy Creek Improvement District is reassuring investors after Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill that will dissolve the special district.www.wesh.com
We also have this quote from Randy Fine who submitted the original bill to the house...
""Had Disney not said 'we are going to use our special privileges as a guest in your state to overturn a bill that the legislature has duly passed [and] the governor has duly signed,' people would not have started looking at special districts. The issue [rose] to the surface as a result," he said."
The bolded part is also easier to fight in court. If the new board steps out of line there is nothing to stop Disney from suing. Disney recently sue Orange County on tax assessments for the resorts and parks. If the board spends money frivolously or refuses to approve something that can be handled one off in court and would be easier and cheaper to win.I suspect Disney's legal dept spent many hours on this. They possibly even consulted with outside First Amendment experts.
I suspect they also took into account the makeups of the courts they would have to appeal through (which all lean heavily conservative).
They would have considered what is gained by winning vs. the downside of losing.
They would have contemplated what this would look like in the news, potentially dragging out for years.
They would have presented this to senior leadership (Iger himself?) to make the call.
The more I think about it, the more I think statements like this that were added to the new charter:
Section 24. Ad valorem taxes.—The board of supervisors shall have the power to levy and assess an ad valorem tax on all the taxable real and tangible personal property in the district to pay the principal of and interest on any general obligation bonds of the district, to provide for any sinking or other funds established in connection with any such bonds, and to finance and defray the cost of any of the projects or activities of the district authorized by the provisions of this act or under law, provided that the district's ad valorem taxing authority shall be limited to serving or benefitting the property owners of the district.
were enough for Disney.
I suspect Disney's team of lobbyists got enough for Disney to be OK with the new charter.
Despite what so many others on this thread think, I don't believe the governor is out to screw Disney financially. Instead, he wants the social issues win. DeSantis is establishing his national brand as a social warrior, and this might be enough to land him the Republican nomination.
What are you even talking about? What favor was done? Was Disney paying for their own services the favor? Developing a model building code that the state endorsed for several decades the favor? The double taxation?Are people just as offended when they have favors done or special treatment when they give money to those politicians?
Or is that ok? Genuine question. Some people see the reciprocity and bribe as just a wording difference, I guess because it is an incentive and not a promise officially it does not bother people as much, but that is what it is.
Wording always matters is how I see this one.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.