News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

Cliff

Well-Known Member
It seems to me that Universal can launch new rides and build new hotels and even build a giant new park…and not be hampered by “their” govt oversight.

Universal builds attractions two, three and four times faster than Disney does. They seems to have no problems with the city or Orange County trying to kill them.

What does Universal have that Disney doesn’t have? What is Disney afraid of?
 

MagicHappens1971

Well-Known Member
It seems to me that Universal can launch new rides and build new hotels and even build a giant new park…and not be hampered by “their” govt oversight.

Universal builds attractions two, three and four times faster than Disney does. They seems to have no problems with the city or Orange County trying to kill them.

What does Universal have that Disney doesn’t have? What is Disney afraid of?
I think everyone that is taking this take has a gross misunderstanding of the differences between Disney & Universal. Disney owns and operates a land mass spanning twice the size of Manhattan. They operate 28 resort hotels, 4 theme parks, 2 water parks, a shopping district, and have over 60,000 employees. RCID supplies waste management, and other utilities to all of the properties, as well as manages road work, etc. RCID also does a myriad of other things that affect day-to-day ops of WDW. Aside from that this hostile governor creating a board that could now effectively cost Disney countless hours & money wasted when trying to make new developments. This also takes away RCIDs ability to repair their own roads, etc, when have you ever seen a pothole at WDW? This issue is not black and white and it’s not as simple as Disney VS Universal. You’re comparing apples to oranges
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
It seems to me that Universal can launch new rides and build new hotels and even build a giant new park…and not be hampered by “their” govt oversight.

Universal builds attractions two, three and four times faster than Disney does. They seems to have no problems with the city or Orange County trying to kill them.

What does Universal have that Disney doesn’t have? What is Disney afraid of?
You really don’t understand the difference?
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
It seems to me that Universal can launch new rides and build new hotels and even build a giant new park…and not be hampered by “their” govt oversight.

Universal builds attractions two, three and four times faster than Disney does. They seems to have no problems with the city or Orange County trying to kill them.

What does Universal have that Disney doesn’t have? What is Disney afraid of?
Not really the same situation.

If the state removed RCID and let Disney deal with the local counties then it would be closer to what Universal has to do. Even then there are aspects that would make that more difficult for Disney. The size difference alone is massive and creates different challenges that Universal will likely never face.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Wow based on this associated picture it looks like the Reedy Creek sheriff is already arresting people
BA3F0069-6C1A-4564-9699-8556EADB0096.jpeg
 

GoofGoof

Premium Member
It seems to me that Universal can launch new rides and build new hotels and even build a giant new park…and not be hampered by “their” govt oversight.

Universal builds attractions two, three and four times faster than Disney does. They seems to have no problems with the city or Orange County trying to kill them.

What does Universal have that Disney doesn’t have? What is Disney afraid of?
Last I checked Orange County wasn’t run by a board hand picked by the Governor so let’s start with that.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure the Board of Supervisors can raise taxes without Disney's approval. From the FL constitution:

SECTION 9. Local taxes.—​
(b) Ad valorem taxes, exclusive of taxes levied for the payment of bonds and taxes levied for periods not longer than two years when authorized by vote of the electors who are the owners of freeholds therein not wholly exempt from taxation, shall not be levied in excess of the following millages upon the assessed value of real estate and tangible personal property: for all county purposes, ten mills; for all municipal purposes, ten mills; for all school purposes, ten mills; for water management purposes for the northwest portion of the state lying west of the line between ranges two and three east, 0.05 mill; for water management purposes for the remaining portions of the state, 1.0 mill; and for all other special districts a millage authorized by law approved by vote of the electors who are owners of freeholds therein not wholly exempt from taxation. A county furnishing municipal services may, to the extent authorized by law, levy additional taxes within the limits fixed for municipal purposes.​

Disney previously approved the mill rate that RCID currently collects. By writing the bill so that RCID continues, presumably this covers existing bonds as well any previously approved millage.

In addition, ad valorem taxes have to be spent within the district or on nearby transportation projects. From the bill:

Without limiting the district's authority to use ad valorem taxes and other unencumbered collected fees and revenues within the district, the district may use ad valorem taxes and other unencumbered collected fees and revenues to provide funding for public road projects, rail projects, and other regional transportation projects outside of the district's boundaries provided that such projects are within Orange County or Osceola County; improve a street, road, highway, interstate, or rail system that abuts or crosses into or through the district; serve or benefit the property owners in the district as determined by the board; and are performed, operated, governed, managed, or appropriated by the state or its agencies, Orange County, or Osceola County.​

My takeaway is that ad valorem taxes collected by the district are limited to projects either within the district or nearby (mostly) roads & bridges.

Taken together, I can't imagine this gives the board a blank check to raise taxes however much they like. The money will be spent on items that directly or indirectly benefit Disney, and any increases will be approved by district landowners.

Instead, as you mention:

For example, with the new board, I'm not sure the Splash Mountain to Tiana's Bayou Adventure retheming takes place because it's "woke".
The bill authorizes a tax up to 30 mills and an additional maintenance fee up to 10 mills.
 

GoofGoof

Premium Member
I'm not sure the Board of Supervisors can raise taxes without Disney's approval. From the FL constitution:

SECTION 9. Local taxes.—​
(b) Ad valorem taxes, exclusive of taxes levied for the payment of bonds and taxes levied for periods not longer than two years when authorized by vote of the electors who are the owners of freeholds therein not wholly exempt from taxation, shall not be levied in excess of the following millages upon the assessed value of real estate and tangible personal property: for all county purposes, ten mills; for all municipal purposes, ten mills; for all school purposes, ten mills; for water management purposes for the northwest portion of the state lying west of the line between ranges two and three east, 0.05 mill; for water management purposes for the remaining portions of the state, 1.0 mill; and for all other special districts a millage authorized by law approved by vote of the electors who are owners of freeholds therein not wholly exempt from taxation. A county furnishing municipal services may, to the extent authorized by law, levy additional taxes within the limits fixed for municipal purposes.​

Disney already approved the mill rate that RCID currently collects. By writing the bill so that RCID continues, presumably this covers existing bonds as well any previously approved millage.

In addition, ad valorem taxes have to be spent within the district or on nearby transportation projects. From the bill:

Without limiting the district's authority to use ad valorem taxes and other unencumbered collected fees and revenues within the district, the district may use ad valorem taxes and other unencumbered collected fees and revenues to provide funding for public road projects, rail projects, and other regional transportation projects outside of the district's boundaries provided that such projects are within Orange County or Osceola County; improve a street, road, highway, interstate, or rail system that abuts or crosses into or through the district; serve or benefit the property owners in the district as determined by the board; and are performed, operated, governed, managed, or appropriated by the state or its agencies, Orange County, or Osceola County.​

My takeaway is that ad valorem taxes collected by the district are limited to projects either within the district or nearby roads & bridges.

Taken together, I can't imagine this gives the board a blank check to raise taxes however much they like. The money will be spent on items that directly or indirectly benefit Disney, and any increases will be approved by district landowners.

Instead, as you mention:

For example, with the new board, I'm not sure the Splash Mountain to Tiana's Bayou Adventure retheming takes place because it's "woke".
You are assuming the FL constitution even matters anymore 😮 . I wouldn’t put it past them to raise taxes anyway and “let the courts decide”.

Even if they ultimately can’t raise taxes they can still indirectly cost Disney more money by cutting services currently paid for by RCID that Disney values and forcing them to either do without or pay out of pocket. For example, they can charge patients who are treated or transported by RCID EMTs whatever they want. If Disney wanted to avoid injured guests being slapped with that bill then Disney would have to eat the cost. Same goes for the free parking in the garages. As far as the money collected being spent on projects within the district that is true, but can also be exploited. For example, they can hire their cousin’s company to pick up trash or pave roads at 5Xs the current cost which will burn through the district’s budget. They could also authorize expensive surveys, and lengthily legal reviews of all kinds of things and guess who performs those services…..you guessed it….”friends of the program”.

As far as rides and construction in the parks, I agree. There could be an attempt to control projects and content there as well. They cannot do it overtly, but it would be easy enough to find fault somewhere and delay or block things. Hopefully it doesn’t come to that but if it does that will likely result in Disney investing less and less in WDW. New attractions will go elsewhere. There’s no way to move WDW and it’s not going to close, but there’s no guarantee they keep investing as heavily in the parks either and most of us around here feel they haven’t invested nearly enough already. Could result in a dark period for WDW until the winds of change blow in and the Government power shifts.
 

Cliff

Well-Known Member
I think everyone that is taking this take has a gross misunderstanding of the differences between Disney & Universal. Disney owns and operates a land mass spanning twice the size of Manhattan. They operate 28 resort hotels, 4 theme parks, 2 water parks, a shopping district, and have over 60,000 employees. RCID supplies waste management, and other utilities to all of the properties, as well as manages road work, etc. RCID also does a myriad of other things that affect day-to-day ops of WDW. Aside from that this hostile governor creating a board that could now effectively cost Disney countless hours & money wasted when trying to make new developments. This also takes away RCIDs ability to repair their own roads, etc, when have you ever seen a pothole at WDW? This issue is not black and white and it’s not as simple as Disney VS Universal. You’re comparing apples to oranges
Five years from now, maybe this WILL be the Amagedon that some might think it is. But I'm confident that Nobody "really" knows how this will play out when the dust settles.

I have a funny feeling that five years from now, the "front facing" aspects of the parks and hotels will look exactly as it does today. Park guests wont see the closed door fighting that could go on behind the scenes but the rest will basically look the same.

Only time will tell though.....
 
Last edited:

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Five years from now, maybe this WILL be the Amagedon that some might think it is. But I'm that Nobody "really" knows how this will play out when the dust settles.

I have a funny feeling that five years from now, the "front facing" aspects of the parks and hotels will look exactly as it does today. Park guests wont see the closed door fighting that could go on behind the scenes but the rest will basically look the same.

Only time will tell though.....
There is absolutely no reason to do this if it is to result in the status quo.
 

BuzzedPotatoHead89

Well-Known Member
There is absolutely no reason to do this if it is to result in the status quo.
I would argue optics, even if toothless. But I suspect you’re right.

If realistically this new board doesn’t “make hay” then this won’t be politically advantageous for DeSantis’ political standing. So at least in the short term this board needs to “prove its worth” by creating as many headaches as possible. Otherwise he’ll be accused by his base of appeasement.
 

kenny279

Active Member
I'm not sure the Board of Supervisors can raise taxes without Disney's approval. From the FL constitution:

SECTION 9. Local taxes.—​
(b) Ad valorem taxes, exclusive of taxes levied for the payment of bonds and taxes levied for periods not longer than two years when authorized by vote of the electors who are the owners of freeholds therein not wholly exempt from taxation, shall not be levied in excess of the following millages upon the assessed value of real estate and tangible personal property: for all county purposes, ten mills; for all municipal purposes, ten mills; for all school purposes, ten mills; for water management purposes for the northwest portion of the state lying west of the line between ranges two and three east, 0.05 mill; for water management purposes for the remaining portions of the state, 1.0 mill; and for all other special districts a millage authorized by law approved by vote of the electors who are owners of freeholds therein not wholly exempt from taxation. A county furnishing municipal services may, to the extent authorized by law, levy additional taxes within the limits fixed for municipal purposes.​

Disney previously approved the mill rate that RCID currently collects. By writing the bill so that RCID continues, presumably this covers existing bonds as well any previously approved millage.

In addition, ad valorem taxes have to be spent within the district or on nearby transportation projects. From the bill:

Without limiting the district's authority to use ad valorem taxes and other unencumbered collected fees and revenues within the district, the district may use ad valorem taxes and other unencumbered collected fees and revenues to provide funding for public road projects, rail projects, and other regional transportation projects outside of the district's boundaries provided that such projects are within Orange County or Osceola County; improve a street, road, highway, interstate, or rail system that abuts or crosses into or through the district; serve or benefit the property owners in the district as determined by the board; and are performed, operated, governed, managed, or appropriated by the state or its agencies, Orange County, or Osceola County.​

My takeaway is that ad valorem taxes collected by the district are limited to projects either within the district or nearby (mostly) roads & bridges.

Taken together, I can't imagine this gives the board a blank check to raise taxes however much they like. The money will be spent on items that directly or indirectly benefit Disney, and any increases will be approved by district landowners. Although I have read another comment, and I understand now.

Instead, as you mention:

For example, with the new board, I'm not sure the Splash Mountain to Tiana's Bayou Adventure retheming takes place because it's "woke".
I can admit I am ill informed. However, I am not sure what you mean about the attraction. I would assume they would not need approval for as they would a road project or other type of infrastructure or land use changes would.
 

ParentsOf4

Well-Known Member
I can admit I am ill informed. However, I am not sure what you mean about the attraction. I would assume they would not need approval for as they would a road project or other type of infrastructure or land use changes would.
Construction projects have to be approved by the board.

As @lazyboy97o wrote above, "the district will have the means to prevent an attraction from commencing construction and/or even opening because they do not like its content."

I think this is where we will see the biggest pushback from the new board.
 

sedati

Well-Known Member
people on twitter are funny, I keep seeing like "Disney should just move out of Florida"....yeah, 4 massive theme parks, 2 water parks, 23+ hotels and 60,000 employees should just move somewhere up north....amazing.
Amazing, yes the logistics are astounding, but should that actually matter? The whole of Detroit’s’ manufacturing empire was moved South and beyond, so why not? The idea that Disney can’t move puts it in an unfair position that no other business or individual would encounter if so egregiously attacked by the State.
 

mmascari

Well-Known Member
So, let’s imagine RCID never does a new project again. They slow roll all maintenance to reduce spending as much as possible. Reduce staff, reduce quality of services, add usage fees. Then devote any extra money in the budget to pay off existing bonds that can be paid early. That would clear the path to completely eliminating the district at some point. It would also be a stick to wave at Disney to control their content and opinions.

In response, Disney operations are harder. Ultimately either prices increase or guest experience suffers or capacity decreases. That in turn leads to other cost cutting, staff reductions, decreases in tourism. Universal may pick up some of that capacity, but it sounds like a loss overall.

With one move, the entire central FL economy is switched from expanding to contracting. Bold move for a politician. It’ll be a bigger issue for the local politicians, as they’ll be around when the contraction is clear. The current governor will have moved on and left the mess for someone else.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom