No Floridian pays income taxes.
Individuals don't, but corporations do.
No Floridian pays income taxes.
You are being pedantic
Saying the sky will fall and everyone will get stuck with the bill is just as pointless. The bond holders will be paid, who will pay is immaterial. The doom scenarios are out in left field
The Prince has spoken. Guess im definitely wrong backed with zero evidence
The Financial Times is reporting the following:
Florida lawmakers are working on plans to reverse a move that would strip Disney of its right to operate a private government around its theme parks, potentially resolving the fallout from the “Don’t Say Gay” controversy that dragged the entertainment giant into the culture wars....[Linda Stewart, a Democratic state senator,] said a potential compromise under discussion would bar Disney from building a nuclear power plant or an airport on the property, rights granted to the company by Florida in 1967 that it is unlikely to use.More significantly for DeSantis, there is also discussion of allowing the governor to appoint two members to the Reedy Creek board. “These compromises can be done with the least amount of impact,” Stewart said.
The issuer is not going away, in the event of default the insurer would pay in the issuers name
Lol, WDW can’t even be bothered to operate parking trams, but sure, maybe some day they’ll decide to use flying taxis.Curtailing the District in real ways is not a real win.
Nuclear power is allowed in Florida. The District already has offsite power generating facilities. Not allowing the District to engage in nuclear power means that even in the future they can’t do something like buy into a reactor at one of the existing private nuclear power plants in the state. Just because it seems a long shot and isn’t in the plan now, the District being the sole utility provider not allowed to do something that may be favored by the state is a loss.
A number of companies are working on a variety of flying taxi like vehicles and services. Not being able to even consider again offering something like the STOLport is a loss.
Having to pay people who don’t really do anything and are not necessary for the process, is an ongoing financial loss, even if small.
What is being discussed is not a real win for Disney, it is a real material loss. Just repeatedly demanding it be called a win and a compromise does not mean these plans actually meet that criteria.
Bond issued by government are not self insured, no one would buy one. How many defaulted bonds have you held? I have had several, love themYou do know governments are self-insured....
Disney willing to concede that they will not build a nuclear power plant or airport on property is a strong indication that current corporate leadership has no intensions of undertake either of these costly endeavors for the foreseeable future.
Beyond the regulatory hurdles, future WDW vacationers might be turned off by a nearby nuclear power plant or the constant drone of aircraft overhead. I suspect Disney's corporate leadership understands this.
When he wasn't with the company he's only representing his personal views. Now he has to represent both, so his responses have to be more measured. It doesn't mean he changed anything. He even said the opposite - that what people label as 'political' sometimes isn't - meaning this isn't actually a political issue despite what is being spun. Its a moral one.To say he stands by what he said in February when he was not in the and the company with that.
To say he is aware that just as many people that work for him don't feel the same.aboit what he said in February.
Anything other than the vague.
Disney willing to concede that they will not build a nuclear power plant or airport on property is a strong indication that current corporate leadership has no intensions of undertake either of these costly endeavors for the foreseeable future.
Beyond the regulatory hurdles, future WDW vacationers might be turned off by a nearby nuclear power plant or the constant drone of aircraft overhead. I suspect Disney's corporate leadership understands this.
Bond issued by government are not self insured, no one would buy one. How many defaulted bonds have you held? I have had several, love them
"RCID won't "go away". It will be restructured in some form which will be determined by whatever legislation the Legislature passes in the upcoming 2023 session. Committees are due to return to Tallahassee soon to start discussing bills. And the governor's proposed budget is due at the end of the year.'
66666
This;
Are these bonds? Have you checked the underwriting?I worked on the issuance of $250M in bonds for DEP. Those bonds were insured by the state's taxing authority.
Are these bonds? Have you checked the underwriting?
Did you read the Fitch warning? They are not concerned and I think they can be considered the pro hereYes, they were bonds. And as ALL state bonds, they were handled through the Division of Bond Finance.
You are definitely in the wrong place for your needs, so you'll just have to find another place to post. Good-bye.The Prince has spoken. Guess im definitely wrong backed with zero evidence
Did you read the Fitch warning? They are not concerned and I think they can be considered the pro here
Current leadership’s position is not really relevant. As far as I’m aware, TECO isn’t pursuing nuclear power but I doubt we’d be saying how it makes sense to prevent them, and only them, from ever engaging in it. How it is not really a loss because they’re not pursuing it right now?Disney willing to concede that they will not build a nuclear power plant or airport on property is a strong indication that current corporate leadership has no intensions of undertake either of these costly endeavors for the foreseeable future.
Beyond the regulatory hurdles, future WDW vacationers might be turned off by a nearby nuclear power plant or the constant drone of aircraft overhead. I suspect Disney's corporate leadership understands this.
Current leadership’s position is not really relevant. As far as I’m aware, TECO isn’t pursuing nuclear power but I doubt we’d be saying how it makes sense to prevent them, and only them, from ever engaging in it. How it is not really a loss because they’re not pursuing it right now?
Reedy Creek Improvement District already owns facilities located outside of the district. It’s latest a solar power generating facilities are located outside the District. Preventing the District from utilizing nuclear doesn’t just prevent them from building a plant at Walt Disney World. It would mean they could not invest in new or existing reactors located elsewhere such as the two existing nuclear power plants in the state. Why should a valid, state regulated utility be prevented from making investments open to all other state regulated utilities? What they are interested in doing right now is immaterial, regulations, restrictions and limitations should be applied uniformly.
The district will have the same land, the same utility use the same road requirements no matter who runs it. The ability of area to repay the bonds that were issued for the area is not diminished. Not my word but Fitch's. Yes the bonds will be paid and the revenue from the taxing in the district will be used to repay them.Did I say the bonds were in danger of default? No.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.