In the latest episode of The Disney Dish,
@lentesta brings up the interesting argument that the law dissolving districts that predate the current constitution doesn’t even apply to the Reedy Creek Improvement District. The law says it dissolves districts that have not been “reestablished, re-ratified, or otherwise
reconstituted” and the argument he presents is that the supreme court ruling along with multiple references to the District in subsequent legislation and state agency work would all constitute “re-ratification” as the state repeatedly acknowledged the District’s legal existence.