News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

LAKid53

LAKid53

Official Member of the Girly Girl Fan Club
Premium Member
whobdis said:
The district was set up in May of 1967. And the taxes are going down due to anticipated budget buy why do you think that is? The rest may be accurate I don't know. But it's irrelevant to my point and to the original post that stated costs/tax for residents would increase. Disney is yet another corp that's taken advantage of their situation. One would have to be an idiot to think otherwise. They are in this to make money and make their shareholders happy. And maybe stop attacking those who think differently than you...it's for the small minded (see what I did there). Take your mouse ears off and have a good day
Click to expand...

Taken advantage of exactly WHAT situation? If the District didn't exist, Orange and Osceola Counties would be required to provide all the services the District currently does. And all the infrastructure necessary to build the parks...roads, water, waste, sewage, etc. And guess who pays for that? Every single homeowner in the two counties. Disney would have come out ahead, financially, if the District had been abolished because by statute the counties must assume the obligations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
M

mmascari

Well-Known Member
MR.Dis said:
Maybe Disney should start worrying about actually running the company than fighting endless law suites. The Stock price dropped to lowest point in eight years. Ouch. Not saying they were wrong, but this is just taking too much attention away from what they should be doing, supplying quality entertainment.
Click to expand...
A lawsuit isn't something you fight. It's a way of fighting something else.

In this case, it's the way they are fighting changes to a government entity with taxing and legal control over a gigantic business location they run.

Those changes are either good or bad for business. Presumably, since Disney if fighting them, they view the changes as bad for business. Which making fighting those changes with lawsuits exactly focusing on running the company.

Most of the armchair CEO's who post here would agree that the changes to RCID are a net negative for Disney's business.

I take it you disagree with that? Is there something with the changes you can point at that is better for Disney's business? And hence they should stop fighting it, since the changes would be a net positive for Disney?
 
M

MR.Dis

Well-Known Member
wdwmagic said:
It's a hugely important issue for the long term interests of WDW. They cannot standby and in my opinion are doing the absolute right thing to challenge what has happened.
Click to expand...
Sounds like Nero playing his fiddle while Rome burns. Not going to go over the issues again, there are almost 1100 pages. There is a very real chance that after all is said and done, the State of Florida will have the final say on the ruling body. In the mean time the company could be in shambles. So if you think it is worth the challenge, you have the right to your opinion. I simply do not agree.
 
Stripes

Stripes

Premium Member
Companies the size of Disney are sued endlessly. Disney is probably fighting over 200 lawsuits right now. That’s partly why they have a dedicated legal department.

The people making movies and designing attractions are not focused on this whatsoever. The notion that focusing on protecting your company’s financial interests and defending its constitutional rights is a “distraction” that is harming the company in other ways is simply ludicrous.
 
lazyboy97o

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
MR.Dis said:
Sounds like Nero playing his fiddle while Rome burns. Not going to go over the issues again, there are almost 1100 pages. There is a very real chance that after all is said and done, the State of Florida will have the final say on the ruling body. In the mean time the company could be in shambles. So if you think it is worth the challenge, you have the right to your opinion. I simply do not agree.
Click to expand...
How does more third party design review and control input help the company better perform financially? How will Bridget Ziegler help make better movies and attractions? Martin Garcia probably thinks they didn’t even have movies in the 60s.
 
Stellajack

Stellajack

Well-Known Member
MR.Dis said:
Maybe Disney should start worrying about actually running the company than fighting endless law suites. The Stock price dropped to lowest point in eight years. Ouch. Not saying they were wrong, but this is just taking too much attention away from what they should be doing, supplying quality entertainment.
Click to expand...
OK...I am going to insert my opinion in this and prepare to have folks accuse me of all sorts of things and rip my post apart. We started buying Disney stock in 2009 right after the "crash" @$16 a share. There was even a trip to Disney when the stock fell to $99/share and my husband stopped in EPCOT on that trip to make a purchase because of the drop. We have invested and reinvested and no one but our family members are even aware of this.

This past December '22 we transferred $7000 dollars in stock to our college graduating granddaughter, with plans to do the same thing next December for the next graduate. Disney BETTER NOT stop fighting this battle with CFTOD (or whoever the heck they pretend to be). Not impressed at all with the live meeting that I saw yesterday. At best they seem to be amateurish flunkies. There are several years of pandemic and mismanagement that Disney needs to address and I believe they are attempting to do so. There are also taxpayers in Florida who at some point must speak up as this also affects them.

This is a personal post including my own personal interests, and have no intention of bad-mouthing anyone. This lawsuit MUST play out. BTW, Disney IS still running the company.
 
Brooklin Disney Dad

Brooklin Disney Dad

Active Member
GrumpyFan said:
I do kind of feel bad for them. They had the rug pulled out from under them.

Click to expand...

Is this a contractual benefit or a “perk”? How does he get to take his grandchildren? For free? If this is a matter of just giving out tickets when requested, DW is like an open bar for employees where taxpayers foot the bill. The $1000 stipend restricts employees from inviting more than just their immediate families. Remember, FLA residents already are paying a minimal amount to enjoy the parks compared to tourists. Would love to know how this benefit actually worked. Sounds like it was being mismanaged/abused. Kind of like using 10 sick days when you were only sick for 4 and used the other 6 “just because”. Eventually something has got to give. FYI…I have been union for 23 yrs.
 
JoeCamel

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
Brooklin Disney Dad said:
Is this a contractual benefit or a “perk”? How does he get to take his grandchildren? For free? If this is a matter of just giving out tickets when requested, DW is like an open bar for employees where taxpayers foot the bill. The $1000 stipend restricts employees from inviting more than just their immediate families. Remember, FLA residents already are paying a minimal amount to enjoy the parks compared to tourists. Would love to know how this benefit actually worked. Sounds like it was being mismanaged/abused. Kind of like using 10 sick days when you were only sick for 4 and used the other 6 “just because”. Eventually something has got to give. FYI…I have been union for 23 yrs.
Click to expand...
$1000 barely covers one pass
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom