MK Rapunzel's tower has arrived.

Patricia Melton

Well-Known Member
The burden of proof is on the prosecution, not the defendant.

If you state something as fact, then be prepared to show proof.


Here's another one for you: the poster's name is Rose&Crowner and he goes on in this thread that there will be no tower.

http://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/update-on-roof-in-new-fantasyland-bathrooms.854980/

If you really want to see these, then take the time to use the search function to find them all yourself.

I've been following this project very closely because my niece LOVES Rapunzel so every thread that this part of the current construction was talked about I read and followed closely. In every single one of the threads talking about the latest news about the washrooms, people would claim there would be no tower.

Go back further to October and September and you see a lot more of that. In the last few weeks the main person doing this was Rose&Crowner, but there were others before him in Sept/Oct.
 

Patricia Melton

Well-Known Member
I think when a poster like him starts attacking such a very well -respected member as Martin, it brings out the defense big-time!

My goodness! You are very melodramatic!

No one "attacked" Martin.

Martin was wrong. Just because you think Marin is "a very well-respected member" doesn't mean that Martin is always right.

Martin was wrong and Martin also didn't know the meaning of a word I used and asked for its definition. I taught Martin how to use the online dictionaries to find the meanings of words he doesn't know as well as defining "naysayer" for him...which was the word Martin said he didn't know and wanted to learn the meaning of.

Any "attack" on Martin is in your imagination Nemo14.
 

JustInTime

Well-Known Member
Here's another one for you: the poster's name is Rose&Crowner and he goes on in this thread that there will be no tower.

http://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/update-on-roof-in-new-fantasyland-bathrooms.854980/

If you really want to see these, then take the time to use the search function to find them all yourself.

I've been following this project very closely because my niece LOVES Rapunzel so every thread that this part of the current construction was talked about I read and followed closely. In every single one of the threads talking about the latest news about the washrooms, people would claim there would be no tower.

Go back further to October and September and you see a lot more of that. In the last few weeks the main person doing this was Rose&Crowner, but there were others before him in Sept/Oct.

I just read the thread and he was trolling you. If you go back, the same member talks about having seen the plans. At this point, I think people are just messing with you. Lighten up and have a little fun back. Don't take it too seriously. Nay, I say.
 

Patricia Melton

Well-Known Member
I just read the thread and he was trolling you. If you go back, the same member talks about having seen the plans. At this point, I think people are just messing with you. Lighten up and have a little fun back. Don't take it too seriously. Nay, I say.

What "same member" are you talking about?
 

lebeau

Well-Known Member
I am so confused at what is going on here? Are there inside jokes I am missing? I am normally pretty quick at these things...

Why yes. Yes there are.

It's almost as if someone were paying certain posters to come into threads and derail them with arguments over the definition of "naysayer" and whether or not one of the most respected members of this community follows it closely.

What's the definition of "plant" again?
 

JustInTime

Well-Known Member
What "same member" are you talking about?

Stop reading between the lines. There aren't any. Rose and Crowner. The one you are talking about in that thread. He was trolling you. The last page he clears up what he was saying. He said, "there is no tower". The last page he then says, "there is no tower...yet" basically. You gotta learn to pick your battles and know when the internet is taking you on a troll ride.
 

Nemo14

Well-Known Member
My goodness! You are very melodramatic!

No one "attacked" Martin.

Martin was wrong. Just because you think Marin is "a very well-respected member" doesn't mean that Martin is always right.

Martin was wrong and Martin also didn't know the meaning of a word I used and asked for its definition. I taught Martin how to use the online dictionaries to find the meanings of words he doesn't know as well as defining "naysayer" for him...which was the word Martin said he didn't know and wanted to learn the meaning of.

Any "attack" on Martin is in your imagination Nemo14.


*sits in the dunce-cap corner with Martin*
biggrin.gif
 

Patricia Melton

Well-Known Member
Why yes. Yes there are.

It's almost as if someone were paying certain posters to come into threads and derail them with arguments over the definition of "naysayer" and whether or not one of the most respected members of this community follows it closely.

What's the definition of "plant" again?

Lebeau has got his tinfoil hat on again!

I love the irony of people in these forums claiming Disney is ruthlessly cheap but in almost the same breath accusing those of us who love Disney of being "paid" to be here. There is no way on Earth those two concepts can exist in the same universe.

When was Martin declared "one of the most respected members of this community"? Was there an awards ceremony? I must have missed that. Is there a Hall of Fame for "most respected members" that people new to these boards can see to make sure we pay proper deference to them?
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Martin was wrong and Martin also didn't know the meaning of a word I used and asked for its definition. I taught Martin how to use the online dictionaries to find the meanings of words he doesn't know as well as defining "naysayer" for him...which was the word Martin said he didn't know and wanted to learn the meaning of.
I have a very hard time believing that Martin did not know how to use an online dictionary or the meaning of the word. The problem is you and your big brush that you use to paint outside the numbered areas. You've provided evidence of a potential naysayer, not naysayers.
 

Nemo14

Well-Known Member
Lebeau has got his tinfoil hat on again!

I love the irony of people in these forums claiming Disney is ruthlessly cheap but in almost the same breath accusing those of us who love Disney of being "paid" to be here. There is no way on Earth those two concepts can exist in the same universe.

When was Martin declared "one of the most respected members of this community"? Was there an awards ceremony? I must have missed that. Is there a Hall of Fame for "most respected members" that people new to these boards can see to make sure we pay proper deference to them?


*slides over so Lebeau can join us*
 

JustInTime

Well-Known Member
Lebeau has got his tinfoil hat on again!

I love the irony of people in these forums claiming Disney is ruthlessly cheap but in almost the same breath accusing those of us who love Disney of being "paid" to be here. There is no way on Earth those two concepts can exist in the same universe.

When was Martin declared "one of the most respected members of this community"? Was there an awards ceremony? I must have missed that. Is there a Hall of Fame for "most respected members" that people new to these boards can see to make sure we pay proper deference to them?

Now you are making things worse. There is no need for the disrespect towards Martin. Just stop with the bickering. It's about bathrooms.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
Martin was wrong and Martin also didn't know the meaning of a word I used and asked for its definition.
Nah. I wasn't wrong. Not this time anyway. I've known about the tower since I saw the building plans over a year ago. Perhaps you mistook me for someone else. A nay sayer perhaps? Of course I knew what one is. I was teasing you. It is good though that you can look up definitions on the web. The Internet is such a powerful tool. Work...play...social media...

And thanks ya'll for the defence posts. Not really needed, a bit humbling, but nice to know the family still has manners.
 

lebeau

Well-Known Member
Lebeau has got his tinfoil hat on again!

So says King Corn.

I love the irony of people in these forums claiming Disney is ruthlessly cheap but in almost the same breath accusing those of us who love Disney of being "paid" to be here. There is no way on Earth those two concepts can exist in the same universe.

So it's impossible to imagine a world in which Disney would "cheap out" on expensive rides and still find a little money between the couch cushions to pay a hard-on-his-luck blogger a few scheckles to shout down critics on the internet. I hear you can find bloggers pretty cheap in places like "Mineral City". Just ask around the coffee club.

When was Martin declared "one of the most respected members of this community"? Was there an awards ceremony? I must have missed that. Is there a Hall of Fame for "most respected members" that people new to these boards can see to make sure we pay proper deference to them?

Anyone who's been paying attention to the forums knows how respected Martin is by the community here.

Is the Rapunzel bathroom really so uninteresting that we have to spin our wheels with these kinds of discussions?
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
Patty, I should also add there is the definition of a naysayer, and then there is the opinion of ill-advised (or non-advised) Internet forum newbies.

Claiming something won't happen and being wrong is getting it wrong. Claiming something because that's what you would like to happen is just kid stuff.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom