bryanfze55
Well-Known Member
1. That's not my main beef with it, honestly. Tokyo Disneyland, for example, is even less original and more derivative than MK if we're being technical, with the opening day architecture and design obviously inferior, yet I'd even rather be there than MK.
2. I'll grant you the now-MK exclusives. Trouble is, Tokyo has better versions of the three other rides you just named. I'd rather have a better ride than a better queue, which is generally the case with DL (and MK needs those themed queues more than any other park to distract you from how long it's taking you to actually get on those rides). I'll grant you that MK has from day 1 had to share resources, but all of WDW's parks are underbuilt for the crowds they serve, and I'm absolutely going to ream them for that, because they chose to invent FP+ to try and hide the lack of ride capacity, instead of taking the money they have to do something about it.
3. Again, on paper, I agree with you. But when the WDW parks are deliberately operated to prioritize cost savings and so you have attractions, food venues, etc. intentionally being operated below their full capacity or shuttered, that changes the equation. The other parks are operated properly or are closer to it than the FL parks.
On paper, the differences don't seem profound, but they become profound experiencing them in person.
Can’t really argue with any of that. It is frustrating how Disney has treated its premier resort. At the same time, it’s the cheapest one for me to visit so I try to see SOME silver lining...
Also, I’m sure you’re correct in saying that Splash, Mansion and Jungle are better in Tokyo. I was only comparing them to the Disneyland versions, as that’s my only frame of reference. Should’ve specified that I guess.