Yes, it is.Its not a binary question.
Isn't the issue with Sea World tanking (no pun intended) attendance though? Ever since the Blackfish documentary, people (well, some people) seem to have developed a moral objection to supporting the chain (especially the Sea World parks) which I believe has resulted in a pretty dramatic drop in attendance for the chain. For most amusement parks, there is an ideal ratio guests to employees and if guest numbers are down by 5-10% (I'm not sure of the actual numbers), it would only make sense to reduce staffing by similar amounts. According to their FAQ page (https://seaworld.org/en/animal-info/ask-shamu/faq/), in 2012 they employed more than 21,000 people across all of their properties. A loss of 300 people would be just ~1.5% of their 2012 employment levels which doesn't seem that unreasonable given the slumping attendance. While it's never fun to see companies downsize, it doesn't make sense keeping people on the payroll if they don't have enough business to warrant the extra help.
Disney (and many other parks for that matter) are simply trying to get more dollars for every guest that enters the park and that's why these up-charges have become so popular at amusement parks across the country (Disney is just late to the game).
Yes, it is.
01010100011010000110100101110011001000000111000001101111011011000110110000100000Yes, it is.
You couldn't be more wrong. Blackfish crippled Sea World and what made it worse was how badly Sea World PR screwed up with their initial responses for that first year. They thought it was going to blow over. And most of the layoffs are about getting rid of redundant positions.At this point, Sea World's issues have very little to do with Blackfish. They have had more than enough time to bounce back from that.
This^^ 100%You couldn't be more wrong. Blackfish crippled Sea World and what made it worse was how badly Sea World PR screwed up with their initial responses for that first year. They thought it was going to blow over. And most of the layoffs are about getting rid of redundant positions.
Disney World is in no danger of trouble. They're exploring options for new opportunities for profitability... These are apples to oranges comparisons.
Sea World just announced yesterday that they are laying off hundreds of workers to save only $40 Million dollars. http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/tourism/os-seaworld-layoffs-20161206-story.html
![]()
Ironic, given that Sea World just opened a brand new state of the art roller coaster called Mako and announced plans for another new attraction. Everyone talks about wanting "new rides" but there is more to theme parks than just rides.
I always see people praising Sea World and claiming that it is a better value -- but, the park is dying.
And, all the experts say this is so bizarre because all of the other theme parks are booming right now.
Also, Universal has filed a patent to use drones and Magic Bands called Tapu Tapu bands at Volcano Bay. http://www.bizjournals.com/orlando/...l-seeks-to-use-drones-in-shows-wearables.html
There are many people who claim to know so much about business and constantly criticize Disney's business practices but really don't know anything. And, this is the proof.
The themepark industry is booming. Orlando, in particular is seeing billions of dollars being invested in the themeparks, as well as the city.
At this point, Sea World's issues have very little to do with Blackfish. They have had more than enough time to bounce back from that.
Look at all of the unfortunate events and news that occurred at Disney over this past year alone and it has not hurt them..
Well, not management...."Layoffs. Disney should layoff workers instead offering optional upsells that I don't have to buy."
Really? I don't want to be bothered with an opt-in upsell so vote to lay off workers instead. I'm glad you don't work in WDW management.
No, it really isn't. What other option is there? Other than to artificially increase admission prices. At least, Disney is offering something tangible with upsells.
I totally agree. Likewise, you don't have to say, "lets fire hundreds of workers because attendance is down."No its a sliding scale. You don't have to say buy this $100 event or we fire that guy.
It can be, if we get 2000 more people in the park tomorrow we will need an extra member of staff so we can open another cashier at the burger shop. Then if next week we get another 2000 people maybe we need a few extra staff as this seems to be happening more often. Then a few months later if guest numbers drop again it might be that they decide to run the coaster on one train operation, so they need one less member of staff.
Okay so -- b(0), s(1) = buysellbuysellsellsellsellbuy....01010100011010000110100101110011001000000111000001101111011011000110110000100000
01101001011100110010000001110000011011110110100101101110011101000110110001100101
0111001101110011
That is binary !
The only difference I can see between Sea World and Disney is that Disney is not afraid to take risks. Disney is constantly creating new experiences and technology to pry every last cent out of their customers hand and they are not too good to grovel for it.You couldn't be more wrong. Blackfish crippled Sea World and what made it worse was how badly Sea World PR screwed up with their initial responses for that first year. They thought it was going to blow over. And most of the layoffs are about getting rid of redundant positions.
Not even close but don't let that get in the way of your opinion.Okay so -- b(0), s(1) = buysellbuysellsellsellsellbuy....
The only difference I can see between Sea World and Disney is that Disney is not afraid to take risks. Disney is constantly creating new experiences and technology to pry every last cent out of their customers hand and they are not too good to grovel for it.
I totally agree. Likewise, you don't have to say, "lets fire hundreds of workers because attendance is down."
Disney World's attendance has decreased slightly, yet profits have skyrocketed. People spend more when the parks are less crowded because they are having a better experience overall. So, Sea World losing attendance does not have to result in a loss of profits or having to lay off hundreds of workers.
The only difference I can see between Sea World and Disney is that Disney is not afraid to take risks. Disney is constantly creating new experiences and technology to pry every last cent out of their customers hand and they are not too good to grovel for it.
I totally agree. Likewise, you don't have to say, "lets fire hundreds of workers because attendance is down."
Disney World's attendance has decreased slightly, yet profits have skyrocketed. People spend more when the parks are less crowded because they are having a better experience overall. So, Sea World losing attendance does not have to result in a loss of profits or having to lay off hundreds of workers.
I love SeaWorld. I agree with this post though, Blackfish has crippled them, and it's not going away anytime soon. We have an entire army of SJWs now who could care less about the truth of the company, but will jump on the latest PETA or social media led bandwagon.You couldn't be more wrong. Blackfish crippled Sea World and what made it worse was how badly Sea World PR screwed up with their initial responses for that first year. They thought it was going to blow over. And most of the layoffs are about getting rid of redundant positions.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.