BuddyThomas
Well-Known Member
Because if they made her and everything else look exactly like the original, what would be the point of remaking it?Why does the Blue Fairy look more like a Star Wars character?
Because if they made her and everything else look exactly like the original, what would be the point of remaking it?Why does the Blue Fairy look more like a Star Wars character?
She's a Force Faerie.Why does the Blue Fairy look more like a Star Wars character?
That's the name of the next Tinker Bell movie....She's a Force Faerie.
She becomes a Forcerous!That's the name of the next Tinker Bell movie....
That's your opinion. Many others disagree.There's no point in remaking it in the first place.
Why does the Blue Fairy look more like a Star Wars character?
"Italian" is not a "race."If Pinocchio is supposed to be set in Italy, why Tom Hanks?
"Italian" is not a "race."
The traditional and totally without any scientific definition of race was based on skin color (which does not genetically make one group of humans significantly different than another). Italians are "Caucasian" and "European" and "White" under that kind of thinking.
I believe Mr. Hanks would probably self-identify as White. I wouldn't think his casting is taking a job away from some more talented Italian who has been denied many roles in TV, film, an stage because they are Italian. Besides, Hanks is of Portuguese descent, so, he's got "Mediterranean blood."
With the fall of Rome, Italy underwent constant invasions from Northern Europe and Central Asia, so, there is no "purebred" Italians, as if Sicilian, Central Italy, and Northern Italy could even be thought of as a single tribal group bounded by the current national boundaries of Italy. They ain't.
I'm sorry I misunderstood you.I never mentioned race but ok
The "Live Action" remakes of Aladdin, Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, and Jungle Book made **huge** amounts of money. [Dumbo live-action retelling, not so much.]To accuse those making negative comments about the pointless remaking of a classic animation when the previous attempts have not been great is not an argument in favour of the remake.
With so many wonderful stories out there why do they need to rehash perfection? I recently went through my DVDs as I have far too many and I rewatched several of the Disney live action movies and they were marvellous. The Island At The Top Of The World, Third Man On the Mountain and Treasure Island are tremendous movies and largely forgotten.
I would suggest that Disney go through the classic novels and do us a favour and adapt them faithfully for the screen without going the route of 'inclusivity' by changing character's skin colour, gender or occupation as was done in the abysmal BBC adaption of 'Around the World In 80 Days. Or commission an original fairy tale where the ethnicity of the characters doesn't matter. I really enjoyed Sulphur Springs on Disney+ it was a series about time travel and ghosts and no one cared about the colour of the skins of the characters, we cared about the characters themselves. This kind of series is a rarity today.
Ah, good, they'll be localizing the movie for Germany.View attachment 642573
First PR pics of new live action 101 Dalmatians released!
Beauty and the Beast is set in France and none of the main actors were French. I can give more examples.If Pinocchio is supposed to be set in Italy, why Tom Hanks?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.