News Paradise Pier Becoming Pixar Pier

Curious Constance

Well-Known Member
Lol. You know, I kind of do think they are. Or at least Is like to think so.

They must have felt bad for hurting you, here is their apology.

upload_2017-7-16_12-42-36.jpeg
 

britain

Well-Known Member
Ok, I've thought through this, and calmed down a little...

I don't care if Pixar IP takes over the whole Pier. I do care if the themes spoil the charming thing they've got going currently in the area.

I don't NEED Mickey up on that wheel, but it really solved the "How to make a generic big wheel fit better in a Disney park?" problem in a charming way - tie it to the start of the old Mickey cartoons. What could they possibly do that would be a step up from that? Again, I don't care if it's Pixar IP or not. I just can't imagine a pleasing solution coming out of this.
 
D

Deleted member 107043

Haha you re right. I know it's not what you re talking about. My disconnect is here - I'm just not understanding why Disney sees any value in a Pixar land of rethemed flat rides when they have high quality and better themed Pixar rides spread through out the resort, including the universally praised Cars Land.

I don't know, but it could be that they want the coporate brand better represented by arranging things under a single umbrella as much as possible. No different than SW Land or WoP, WWoHP, Marvel Land, etc.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
I don't know why they have to keep so many dang secrets. Just tell us already!

Because they have no idea what they are doing. Also because the senior execs are drunk much of the time.

At least that's what I got out of the Parks Presentation yesterday.



0:10 "In 2018 the Resort will come alive with Pixar Fest" = Polite golf applause
0:20 "Featuring a new fireworks spectacular and entertainment" = Awkward murmurs
0:25 "Pixar Play Parade will move across the street to Disneyland!" = Dead Silence
0:35 "Paint The Night returns to California Adventure!" = WILD CHEERING!

John Lasseter arrives from the Hilton lobby bar at 1:40 "Ih greww up in Whithhier Cahlufrnia!" :eek:
 
Last edited:

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
I like how Chapek said that MB has higher approval ratings than any other attraction at the park right now. Ummm ya dude it just opened 2 months ago.

To be fair VB has one of the worst approval ratings in all of Orlando and it's also two months old.

I can't find your other quote but Marvel land is definitely not going to be 20 acres... I'd have to measure but maybe 6-8 at best?
 

britain

Well-Known Member
Also, I tolerate the toy story characters being in a turn of the century midway by virtue of "woody's round up" being kind of old. It's from the 50's, but cowboy themed entertainment could be found in turn-of-the-century amusement parks. I know it doesn't really work, but it's a forgivable stretch.

Plus I will accept Midway Mania on the precedent of Pirates of the Caribbean and an adventure on the Spanish Main being housed inside a turn of the century New Orleans area. Exteriors need not necessarily reflect interiors.

If the same logic is applied to all the new buildings at Pixar pier, that's fine.

But the Incredibles...? They are mid-century modern. I don't mind seeing Bing Bong painted on some Victorian clapboard, but not the Incredibles!

Hmm... I wonder if they are going to let the pier time period broaden? What if the backstory is that this roller coaster was built in the early 60s?

Maybe... I wonder if they'll put that much thought into it.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
I don't know, but it could be that they want the coporate brand better represented by arranging things under a single umbrella as much as possible. No different than SW Land or WoP, WWoHP, Marvel Land, etc.

But all of your examples with the exception of Marvel (which is why I have a problem with Marvel Land too) to an extent are under the umbrella of one universe. Not 10 or so different IPs that have nothing to do with each other. In addition all of those examples are immersive worlds with World class attractions. Not rethemed flat rides.
 
Last edited:

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
So dumb. As much as I like Lasetter, this is him just him flexing his muscle now. Chapek already did it. It was his turn now. If you can't beat em, join em I guess. They better save some face and add a killer dark ride somewhere.

He did the same thing with Cars Land. He's getting on my nerves.

I don't want to join anyone currently at Disney lol.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
To be fair VB has one of the worst approval ratings in all of Orlando and it's also two months old.

I can't find your other quote but Marvel land is definitely not going to be 20 acres... I'd have to measure but maybe 6-8 at best?


Haha I figured I was exaggerating with "20." I meant 15. Anyway, 6-8 seems small. Even if Marvel doesn't take any of the bus transport area or the backlot, it would still include the area around TOT, expansion pad behind TOT and Bugs land? Isn't the expansion pad behind TOT 8-10 acres alone?

Sorry, what's VB? I'm not saying MB is a bad ride because it's not. But they rethemed an already popular attraction to a hot franchise and it's also new. It's not surprising, the approval ratings are the highest at the resort two months after it opened. I'd be curious to see where TOT ranked last year. I would have to assume somewhere in the Top 5. So it would make sense that a retheme to popular attraction could bring it up a few spots, especially in the honeymoon phase.

EDIT: VB = volcano bay.
 
Last edited:

TP2000

Well-Known Member
To be fair VB has one of the worst approval ratings in all of Orlando and it's also two months old.

I can't find your other quote but Marvel land is definitely not going to be 20 acres... I'd have to measure but maybe 6-8 at best?

Remind us what VB is? I'm not surprised Mission: BREAKOUT! has such a high approval rating, it's insanely fun!

EDIT: Ah, Volcano Bay, that new waterslide park at Universal Studios. The TripAdvisor reviews on that place are disastrous!
 
Last edited:

Travel Junkie

Well-Known Member
So dumb. As much as I like Lasetter, this is him just him flexing his muscle now. Chapek already did it. It was his turn now. If you can't beat em, join em I guess. They better save some face and add a killer dark ride somewhere.

I'm sure Chapek was all for it. He came from consumer products and supposedly his driving force is to brand everything possible to increase revenue through food and merch.

It appears that he won't be afraid to spend but only if they can slap a marketable brand on it. Disney is no longer running theme parks. They are brand parks.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Yes!
He was totally toasted!

I thought I was the only one who saw that, but the way he was chortling during some moments made me raise an eyebrow.
I've heard about his apparent over enthusiasm for le drink over the years, but wow....right before a company presentation in front of a audience like this..?
A little unprofessional.

Being a little sloshed and doing a power point presentation at Pixar might be the norm these days, but that just doesn't fly here.
Glad to see I'm not the only one thinking this.

Just wow.
Makes the whole reveal of this project all the more unappealing and questionable.
:cyclops:

-

I like John Lasseter and enjoy his work immensely, but...

It's more than just unprofessional, it should be grounds for termination. If an hourly Cast Member showed up for work at the Emporium stock room drunk, he'd be fired. If a 25 year old assistant manager at the Plaza Inn showed up for work drunk, she'd be fired. If a TDA Finance Director showed up for work drunk, he'd be fired.

So how does John Lasseter show up to work drunk, go out onstage in front of 7,000 paying customers drunk, stumble through his presentation standing next to the Chairman of the Parks division, and get to keep his job? Anyone care to defend that? Do Disney's HR executives, many of whom were likely at D23 this weekend, have a position on that? :confused:
 
Last edited:

TP2000

Well-Known Member
You are confusing architectural aesthetic with theme. Making more of the Boardwalk look old timey is not a thematic improvement when it ultimately has a connection to nothing. Being more ornate does not automatically mean more “themed.” It is an unrelated, arbitrary aesthetic choice that does not connect to Pixar. Pixar Place was intended to include other Pixar properties and therefore gave the studio aesthetic a reasoning.

But Pixar Place was abandoned and is about to be literally walled off and destroyed next year. It's just a street with brick facades leading to the Midway Mania entrance, with faux board games and Barrel-O-Monkeys decor strung over the brick buildings to denote WHIMSY! Are you kids having fun?!?

I'm just thinking of the paying audience here. Not the 0.5% of the audience who knows what the generic office park aesthetic of Pixar Studios in Emeryville, California looks like and gets the brick connection. I'm thinking of the 99.5% of the rest of the paying audience who has never heard of Emeryville and could care less what the office park looks like.

I'm talking about these nice people on vacation, waiting for their Midway Mania Fastpass to ripen.
Entrance+to+Pixar+Place+at+Hollywood+Studios.JPG


I'm going out on a limb and say that those 99.5% would rather spend their vacation in a recreation of a Victorian seaside pier with beloved Pixar characters than spend their vacation on a narrow street themed to a suburban office park they've never seen.

Pixar Pier has caught us all off guard and we need more details to truly judge, but if it helps fix the remaining stretch of Paul Pressler's stucco and vinyl signage from 2001, I'm all for it.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom