News Pacific Wharf to be Reimagined into San Fransokyo

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
Too bad there isn't any room for a Baymax ride there. I guess they could replace the parade storage building or one of the resturants.
 
Last edited:

999th Happy Haunt

Well-Known Member
It looks like a minimal overlay that doesn't capture the feel of San Fransokyo from the movie; with its towering buildings and animated billboards. The mini bridge and various signage are the only clues as to what the place is supposed to be.

Also, why are they not building the Aunt's Café? That seems like a no brainer.
If you design a land that needs signage everywhere to convey the place guests are supposed to be at, you are a bad designer.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
If you design a land that needs signage everywhere to convey the place guests are supposed to be at, you are a bad designer.

San Fransokyo is also such a specific place, most people, including some of those who have seen BH6, may not recognize it.

To most it would just read as either real life city, not the hybrid one made up for a Disney cartoon.
 

Suspirian

Well-Known Member
Why aren't the left over Painted Lady houses outside of Grizzly Peak involved in this? Seems like a missed opportunity. There are so many annexed pieces of former lands in DCA from 1.0 AND 2.0 now it doesn't make sense.
 

waltography

Well-Known Member
Why aren't the left over Painted Lady houses outside of Grizzly Peak involved in this? Seems like a missed opportunity. There are so many annexed pieces of former lands in DCA from 1.0 AND 2.0 now it doesn't make sense.
Agreed. Pacific Wharf/Golden Vine Winery/Paradise Gardens Park + those houses made for a fantastic Bay Area district. I assume now that San Fransokyo Square is its own thing, the Painted Ladies will be lumped in with Paradise Gardens Park, leaving the Napa/Sonoma area as part of the festival corridor. Messy.
 

No Name

Well-Known Member
Too bad there isn't any room for a Baymax ride there. I guess they could replace the parade storage building or one of the resturants.
Based on that last D23, they seem to think the ultimate attraction is a meet and greet. Why build a ride when you can have a meet and greet?!

The one Baymax ride they’ve developed (for Tokyo) is conveniently the same as Maters so that kind of doesn’t help either.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
I think they saw the popularity of The Plaza de la Familia (which they’re bringing back in the Fall) so they’re adding this to serve a similar function.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Summer 2023 opening -

View attachment 699534


My God, that looks really stupid. :banghead:

It looked better in the faux nighttime cartoon sketch they first released with all the red patio lights from Cost Plus. Don't get me wrong, it didn't look good in that first sketch, but it at least looked better than whatever the hell this is.

a23ba544-d83e-4b99-bdcd-b353b89d53d3-jpeg.699534
 

No Name

Well-Known Member
It looks weird because they’re tacking on a fake structural element that doesn’t fit with the real structural element which is those curved sides of the bridge. I guess it wasn’t worth building a whole new bridge.

I mean even if they did, I think it would still be too attention-grabbing for what it leads to, and Pacific Wharf was the perfect level of boring.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
The thing with the IP-ifying of these lands and attractions is there’s no going back. They’ll never turn an IP area to non AP. An entertainment conglomerate like Disney with its arsenal of IP and characters will never say “you know what let’s change Avengers campus into an idealized version of San Francisco with a runaway Trolley ride.” Not in my lifetime at least. That’s why it would have been nice if they preserved the legacy of lands like New Orleans Square and the era they come from.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom