aladdin2007
Well-Known Member
Back in the day this promotion would have been a new parade, and a new show. Now we get some nice little updates/touches. Also what would it take for epcot to get some new countries? Seriously.
some mega serious money
Back in the day this promotion would have been a new parade, and a new show. Now we get some nice little updates/touches. Also what would it take for epcot to get some new countries? Seriously.
Was that what the original FLE plan was? Or mistaken?If the princesses are so popular and needed so much in the parks because they bring $$$ value, then why not create a 5th gate for Princessland. They can take the new Fantasyland and add in WS Princess, etc...
Back in the day this promotion would have been a new parade, and a new show. Now we get some nice little updates/touches. Also what would it take for epcot to get some new countries? Seriously.
Yes, yes, I know that Scotland isn't a really a country and is technically represented in the UK pavilion, but remember, Africa sometimes gets represented as one homogenous mega-country.
That's like saying Canada isn't a country.Basically, you'd need a sponsor from a particular country to approach Disney and Disney would need to agree. With that in mind, I think the most likely candidate might be Scotland, depending on how the booth fares at the F&W this year, as they approached Disney following the success of Brave (and the subsequent interest in Scottish culture). Yes, yes, I know that Scotland isn't a really a country and is technically represented in the UK pavilion, but remember, Africa sometimes gets represented as one homogenous mega-country.
Basically, you'd need a sponsor from a particular country to approach Disney and Disney would need to agree. With that in mind, I think the most likely candidate might be Scotland, depending on how the booth fares at the F&W this year, as they approached Disney following the success of Brave (and the subsequent interest in Scottish culture). Yes, yes, I know that Scotland isn't a really a country and is technically represented in the UK pavilion, but remember, Africa sometimes gets represented as one homogenous mega-country.
That makes them already middle class by my standards!There are some hard working working class families who feel the same way too.
Even if WDW did that, many guests would still complain that there are no princesses in WS, and that it is therefore 'not Disney'.If the princesses are so popular and needed so much in the parks because they bring $$$ value, then why not create a 5th gate for Princessland.
I thought the day of sponsorship was over? Considering how almost all of the original sponsors have been slowing backing out as of the last decade with no new ones to take their place. I think the last one I know of is Siemens. Is there a bigger story there? Did someone drop the ball and not keep a good relationship with them, or does Disney not care? Or does sponsorship do nothing for the company. There is a book about this out there I am sure.Basically, you'd need a sponsor from a particular country to approach Disney and Disney would need to agree. With that in mind, I think the most likely candidate might be Scotland, depending on how the booth fares at the F&W this year, as they approached Disney following the success of Brave (and the subsequent interest in Scottish culture). Yes, yes, I know that Scotland isn't a really a country and is technically represented in the UK pavilion, but remember, Africa sometimes gets represented as one homogenous mega-country.
Nor shall she be the last...With the Akerhaus being princess dining, it is not the first princess to pass this way.
Been doing it for years...Kinda reminds me of what they did to the plane over at Back Lot Tours at HS or monorail wrap.
Maybe that is what needs to change, Im sure disney wouldn't mind letting them have the gift shop, if it meant they payed for the new attraction/ride.Disney needs to do a mass overhaul on its sponsorship setup/program. Not even sure if they actively seek companies anymore, but companies do not want to pay the way out of this world rates and fees of what Disney charges and demands, and theres no return benefit like there use to be back in the 80s early 90s. Lets see if Siemens stays on when their contract is up. Is HP still sponsoring MissionSpace?
Personally I think there still could be a good return benefit for some companies, say if for example Crayola became a sponsor of Imagination they could have a huge Crayola store, even though come to think of it Disney would probably keep the majority of profits, so maybe not ideal afterall.
Crayola has its own attraction/shop space in PA and they're pretty tight-fisted with the dollars. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for them to sponsor anything.
Maybe that is what needs to change, Im sure disney wouldn't mind letting them have the gift shop, if it meant they payed for the new attraction/ride.
this thread title could perfectly describe minnesota's football season, too.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.