Orlando Thrill Park unveils 14 rides

Alektronic

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
At least someone is planning on adding a lot of new rides to Orlando.

Orlando Thrill Park unveils 14 rides for planned Florida amusement park

By Brady MacDonald
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
6:05 PM PST, December 1, 2010

With 14 rides, including eight roller coasters, the proposed Orlando Thrill Park hopes to cater to enthusiasts underserved by Florida's theme parks.

Photo gallery: View the 14 proposed Orlando Thrill Park rides

Scheduled to open in summer 2013, the proposed amusement park would include rides from several manufacturers, including Intamin, Vekoma, Chance Morgan, Mack, S&S Power, U.S. ThrillRides and Mondial, according to Chuck Bell, spokesman for the Orlando Thrill Park.

Plans for the 77-acre park call for an assortment of towering thrill rides and every variety of roller coaster -- including hydraulic launched, inverted, flying, motorbike and 4th dimension coasters -- with room set aside for future development. View a photo gallery of the 14 rides proposed for Orlando Thrill Park.

Located on International Drive across the I-4 corridor from Universal Studios Florida, Orlando Thrill Park would be a 5-mile drive from SeaWorld Orlando and about 10 miles from Walt Disney World.

Developers hope to secure financing in the coming months and submit plans for city approval by summer 2011, Bell said. Neighbors have raised concerns about noise and traffic.

During a pair of interviews, Bell stressed that the preliminary plans were subject to change and that the detailed park layout and proposed ride mix would continue to evolve with the project.

Bell pointed to two parks as inspiration for Orlando Thrill Park: Cedar Point in Ohio and Six Flags Magic Mountain in California, which have been dueling for a decade over the title of "Roller Coaster Capital of the World."

But with half as many coasters as Cedar Point and Magic Mountain, OTP's ride inventory would likely look a lot like Knott's Berry Farm in California -- without the Wild West theme, Bell acknowledged. Indeed, eight of the 14 rides envisioned for Orlando Thrill Park can be found at Cedar Point, Magic Mountain and/or Knott's.

Orlando Thrill Park hopes to fill a void created by the absence of any Six Flags or Cedar Fair amusement parks in Florida. Indeed, the Orlando-area parks -- Disney, Universal, SeaWorld and Busch Gardens -- are dominated by theme rather than thrills.

"We're not trying to out-Disney Disney," Bell said. "We know we can't do that."

The hope, he said, would be to steal a day from tourists on weeklong vacations to Orlando and draw locals from throughout Florida. Bell anticipates Orlando Thrill Park could attract 2 million annual visitors out of the roughly 50 million (nearly 47 million last year, says the local tourist bureau) who come to the Orlando area every year. The project includes plans for a 3,300-space multi-story parking structure.

Florida certainly has its share of top-notch coasters: the SheiKra floorless dive machine at Busch Gardens Tampa, the Manta flying coaster at SeaWorld Orlando, the Incredible Hulk launched coaster at Universal's Islands of Adventure and Expedition Everest at Disney's Animal Kingdom.

But only one central Florida park would compete with Orlando Thrill Park's eight proposed coasters: Busch Gardens Tampa, which also claims eight. SeaWorld has only four coasters. and Universal boasts only seven coasters between its two parks. And it’s the same for Disney, which counts a mere seven coasters among its four parks. (All counts are according to Roller Coaster Database)

Orlando Thrill Park would have no themed environments, no costumed characters, no dark rides and few if any shows, Bell said. Instead, it would be all about the biggest, tallest, fastest, longest, steepest and greatest thrills.

No price tag has been pinned to the new park, but by my estimate the ride inventory alone would top $100 million. Bell said he hopes OTP would serve as a proving ground for the latest and greatest from the amusement industry, showcasing one-of-a-kind, prototype, record-breaking, envelope-pushing, adrenaline-based extreme rides.

"To us they're just giant Tinkertoys," Bell said. "After a while, we'll just sell the old rides and add new prototypes."
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
After riding X-2 last year, I love the news of another 4th dimensional coaster being built near Disney World.
 

s8film40

Well-Known Member
This park is long overdue in Orlando.



I think it's an okay spot. I understand being close to uni. Where would you suggest?

Well I think the general location is OK but the exact spot that I heard was being used has really horrible traffic. An amusement park would only add to that. I've been there many times and spent an hour to go less than a mile.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
It sounds over-ambitious to me...and there is a reason you don't find parks that exclusively have rides like this in FL--every time there is a thunderstorm (so every afternoon from June thru the end of September), the entire park will need to close since there won't be any shows or dark rides for guests to ride. While the idea of a thrill-ride-only park sounds fun, it belongs in a drier climate. The fact that Six Flags and Cedar Fair have steered clear of FL should tell OTP's developers something. Best of luck to them, however. Any competition is a good thing--might make Disney build an E-ticket or two...
 

mickey2008.1

Well-Known Member
While I agree this may appeal to locals, as cedar point does for me, i cant see it as a tourist day. But after seeing some of the thrill rides, and being the adventurer that we are, it may be worth a day to experience rides that are only one of a kind. WDW is still our home. Never been to uni or seaworld in the past 8 years, just love wdw and being onsite.
 

JimboJones123

Well-Known Member
Sounds very Adventuredomish like the theme park at Circus Circus in Vegas.

They will probably sell it as a nighttime alternative to closed parks everywhere else.

With most parks closing between 5-7, a two or three day pass would allow for several evenings of extended theme park action. Could be a smart niche.
 

ms7479a

Well-Known Member
Judging by the types of rides it will have, it seems to me that this park will be competing more with Universal than Disney.
 

SeaBase86

Member
I think this park will definitely keep the teens out of Disney. With Universal having 2 parks and now this, teens in the family will be asking Disney who?

Ahh maybe Ms. Crofton may start looking into adding more e ticket thrill rides.
 

ewensell3

Well-Known Member
At least someone is planning on adding a lot of new rides to Orlando.

Orlando Thrill Park unveils 14 rides for planned Florida amusement park

Am I the only one who thought of "Boardwalk and Baseball" when they read this? I know it's not nearly the same situation (B&B was nowhere near being a "thrill park"), but it sounds like the same "We're not Disney/Universal/Seaworld" premise.

Good luck to them, but since I'm not a coaster fan chances are I won't be visiting.
 

Epic Epcot

Member
The idea of an all prototype/experimental coaster park is an pretty innovative spin on the typical "Six Flags/Cedar Fair" model, but I can see some problems arising with it after a couple of years. I wish them the best of luck, Orlando could always use more competition!
 

Brian Noble

Well-Known Member
The hope, he said, would be to steal a day from tourists on weeklong vacations to Orlando
We've been talking about this place on a coaster enthusiast site. The problem most of us see is that the attraction lineup is too narrow---by the time the kids are old enough to be interested in the high-end of the thrill ride category, the parents are generally getting to the point where they are not quite so ambitious. There are exceptions to this---my family, for example---but we are the exception not the rule.

So, without some way of keeping the parents (and maybe that one cautious sibling) occupied while the (other) teens hop from ride to ride, it's hard to see why the entire family would take a day out of their vacation for this. Instead, it's more likely to do "night business" as mentioned above, or perhaps act as a babysitter for the teen crowd while the parents shop or just hang out kid-free. But, the babysitter model doesn't do much for your in-park spending.
 

Testtrack321

Well-Known Member
This park seems to be just a ing contest. Magic Mountain and CP have had decades to expand and build multimillion dollar rides. This places wants to open with a ton right away. This park reeks of Hard Rock Park mentality and business practices.

This place is going to fail badly because nonne can touch Disney! :sohappy::sohappy:

Thanks for that thoughtful, well reasoned addition to this conversation.

The idea of an all prototype/experimental coaster park is an pretty innovative spin on the typical "Six Flags/Cedar Fair" model, but I can see some problems arising with it after a couple of years. I wish them the best of luck, Orlando could always use more competition!

It's been somewhat done before, by S&S themselves (failed) and Paramount added a lot of prototype rides to its parks in the early millennium. One of those rides is now melted down, the other has been moved around a lot. Big failure.

We've been talking about this place on a coaster enthusiast site. The problem most of us see is that the attraction lineup is too narrow---by the time the kids are old enough to be interested in the high-end of the thrill ride category, the parents are generally getting to the point where they are not quite so ambitious. There are exceptions to this---my family, for example---but we are the exception not the rule.

So, without some way of keeping the parents (and maybe that one cautious sibling) occupied while the (other) teens hop from ride to ride, it's hard to see why the entire family would take a day out of their vacation for this. Instead, it's more likely to do "night business" as mentioned above, or perhaps act as a babysitter for the teen crowd while the parents shop or just hang out kid-free. But, the babysitter model doesn't do much for your in-park spending.

I can see this a bit. I can see a thrill only park working, but it can't be built all at once. You HAVE to ease into it. With coasters costing $5-10 million, for the kind they want, you can't build a ton of them right away. You have to ease into it. Again, Hard Rock Park, while it did have several other flaws, proved that building a park with thrill rides doesn't equal instant success. The fact they think 14 thrill rides cost under $100 million is insane. They will easily see their project cost double, if not triple.

EDIT

Hard Rock Park/Freestyle Music Park like? Well that's because IT IS BY THE SAME GUY.

http://www.thesunnews.com/2010/11/14/1809723/freestyle-rides-to-stay-put.html

Best explanation for this came from Brain's forum, coasterbuzz: This just seems to be a real life RCT park.
 
Been waiting for someone to get some balls and build a thrill park, traffic will be awful in that location however. I'll still get an AP if this actually goes through.
 

dandaman

Well-Known Member
This just seems to be a real life RCT park.

Although rare is the occasion where you will see "This churro from Churro Stand 1 is really good value" in a Central Florida park. :lol:

/ Been discussing the HRP/FSMP/failure park and its ties to Orlando Thrill for a while now on Theme Park Review, with largely the same consensus
 

GLaDOS

Well-Known Member
I think people are missing some sarcasm in that Horizons1 guy's post, but that's just me.

Anyway...I don't see this park surviving for very long as it will be completely outmatched for people visiting the area by Disney, Universal, Seaworld, and Busch. There's just nothing that's going to grab the vacation dollars, IMO.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom