That was a lame answer to the retirement age question.
Dean[AU] New Member Mar 3, 2004 #262 http://web.servicebureau.net/conf/m...&m=was&u=/w_ccbn.xsl&date_ticker=3_3_2004_DIS Direct URL BTW.. The one day when I'm working at a production..
http://web.servicebureau.net/conf/m...&m=was&u=/w_ccbn.xsl&date_ticker=3_3_2004_DIS Direct URL BTW.. The one day when I'm working at a production..
drew81 Well-Known Member Mar 3, 2004 #263 I don't feel bad for him. He lies continually to us. What you reap is what you sow. Telling lies is a sin. I say Tony Baxter should be promoted to CEO.
I don't feel bad for him. He lies continually to us. What you reap is what you sow. Telling lies is a sin. I say Tony Baxter should be promoted to CEO.
Bill Account Suspended Mar 3, 2004 #269 eisner: for 1,700,718,000 against" 771,600,000 (About) Edit: these numbers are wrong. They were said too fast.
eisner: for 1,700,718,000 against" 771,600,000 (About) Edit: these numbers are wrong. They were said too fast.
stingrock23 Active Member Mar 3, 2004 #272 Eisner = 2,472,318,000 total 771,600,000 againsts that equals roughly 31%
cindy_k Well-Known Member Mar 3, 2004 #276 Where are the missing shares?? There are large differences between the number of shares for each of the people.
Where are the missing shares?? There are large differences between the number of shares for each of the people.
C civileng68 Account Suspended Original Poster Mar 3, 2004 #280 he's gone Originally posted by JBSLJames So that comes out to roughly a 68% confidance level? Click to expand... It doesnt matter. When more than 20% show against, the guy never lasts.
he's gone Originally posted by JBSLJames So that comes out to roughly a 68% confidance level? Click to expand... It doesnt matter. When more than 20% show against, the guy never lasts.