LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
For what it's worth:
Do kids who don't live in a household with non-parental locked Disney+ even know who the Simpsons are these days? Haven't seen any Simpsons merch outside of an Universal park in years, but I've seen plenty of Targets and Walmarts with dedicated Mario toy aisles.I'd even venture to say The Simpsons as an IP has a lot more recognition than Mario.
With Disney being consistently in the top 10 most recognised brands in the world , and D+ being one of the biggest streaming services in the world I would take an educated guess that Mickey (and possibly Bart & co) are far more recognisable than Mario.Do kids who don't live in a household with non-parental locked Disney+ even know who the Simpsons are these days? Haven't seen any Simpsons merch outside of an Universal park in years, but I've seen plenty of Targets and Walmarts with dedicated Mario toy aisles.
I now have a justified reason for using this image!With Disney being consistently in the top 10 most recognised brands in the world , and D+ being one of the biggest streaming services in the world I would take an educated guess that Mickey (and possibly Bart & co) are far more recognisable than Mario.
Yes, I am kind of surprised it would be a controversial suggestion.I think it's safe to assume that Mickey is globally a more recognisable figure than Mario. I'm not saying that because I'm a Disney fan, but because I'm very, very sure that it's objectively true based on Mickey's near-century-long history and the extent of his reach, which has left few corners of the inhabited world untouched. To me, it's as self-evidently true as the statement that Coca-Cola (which I don't drink or like) is globally a more recognised brand than PG Tips (a very well-known brand of British tea that I drink daily).
Don't know why you're bringing Mickey into this, when I never questioned his high popularity at all (or for that matter the strength of the Disney brand in general).With Disney being consistently in the top 10 most recognised brands in the world , and D+ being one of the biggest streaming services in the world I would take an educated guess that Mickey (and possibly Bart & co) are far more recognisable than Mario.
This tallies with my experience travelling. Authorised or not, Mickey is bound to make an appearance sooner or later wherever you go in the world.Yes, I am kind of surprised it would be a controversial suggestion.
For example, I am in Mexico City at the moment and was walking through the big Bosque de Chapultepec park today which is packed with families and stalls with all kinds of things aimed at kids. Lots of Mickey and Minnie stuff amongst more recent characters (including a surprising amount of Forky!), but if Mario was there he was certainly harder to spot. Also see the knock-off Mickey and Minnie costumed characters in the centre of town!
That's all far from scientific, but my experience moving through the world has certainly been that Mickey is pretty ubiquitous.
That's kind of what I meant by recognition, though. I think the difference between a long-running TV show like The Simpsons is that you don't have to have really seen it to be familiar with the characters due to the way that kind of media penetrates the culture. I would also suggest The Simpsons has had more of a cultural impact than My Three Sons and I'm pretty sure it's still airing outside of streaming.And how many of those children left over are going to even meaningfully connect with the show if they do? I'd imagine it's a lot like Nick At Nite in the 90's where a kid might be semi-familiar with My Three Sons because of advertising and watching a short bit of it, but it's mostly the kids who grew up with it who are watching while those kids grow up and forget about it for the most part.
Thanks! I am a big booster of Mexico City as one of the world's great cities!This tallies with my experience travelling. Authorised or not, Mickey is bound to make an appearance sooner or later wherever you go in the world.
Enjoy Mexico!
I look forward to visiting it one day!Thanks! I am a big booster of Mexico City as one of the world's great cities!
I think it's safe to assume that Mickey is globally a more recognisable figure than Mario. I'm not saying that because I'm a Disney fan, but because I'm very, very sure that it's objectively true based on Mickey's near-century-long history and the extent of his reach, which has left few corners of the inhabited world untouched. To me, it's as self-evidently true as the statement that Coca-Cola (which I don't drink or like) is globally a more recognised brand than PG Tips (a very well-known brand of British tea that I drink daily).
He’s very present in the developing world also (or at least many parts of it).Pick a developed country anywhere in the world and show a picture of Mickey Mouse and nearly 100% will not only know who he is but will also have fond memories of him from their childhood
And what sad is that out here in the US not many give love to the WB Looney Tunes as much...Their representation in the Six Flags chain has decreased dramatically..Sure, they been bringing out new shorts on HBO Max, the tried and failed Space Jam A New Legacy and we're planned a few new things (if they don't get scrapped by the Warner-Discovery merge)..It's interesting to see that the overseas market has a ton of use with their IP's and are very popular..He’s very present in the developing world also (or at least many parts of it).
I completely agree with all of this, and I'll add... The problem I see with Nintendo as a theme park IP is that Nintendo games have always been laser-focussed on gameplay rather than storytelling. There are video games that play the role of movies, to tell you a compelling story and make you feel emotions and connections to the characters. Nintendo games, and Mario games in particular, are about gaming qua gaming. The point is to beat the levels for beating the levels's sake. Can you land that spin jump onto an icy platform? Can you figure out the attack pattern of the lava monster? Can you solve the puzzle that unlocks the secret pipe? The magic of Nintendo is that they execute on gameplay design better than anyone. They rarely publish a game that isn't perfectly coded and polished. But the characters and stories are an afterthought. That's why they've been reusing the same characters for 50 years. People love Mario games because they're great games, not because they're Mario.Every time I see people claiming Mario and Nintendo is some kind of IP to end all IPs it makes me think that if you're into video games and surrounded by people who are into them it must seem like that. As someone who doesn't fall into the category, the IP and its characters are at best a very hazy presence in my consciousness and not something I really come across often in popular culture or even among friends or their kids all that much in the same way as something like Potter, Marvel, or even Mickey. I'd even venture to say The Simpsons as an IP has a lot more recognition than Mario.
Doesn't mean it's not a huge IP that has the potential to be massive for Universal. My impression is just that people who are into it don't quite realise how aloof those who aren't into it are about all the different worlds and characters being represented. You almost can't avoid know the basics of Potter or Marvel, and I say that as someone who has next to no direct engagement of either.
Well, they said that about IOA, DCA, and Disneyland Paris. That's not to say that Epic Universe will open like any of them, but I'm always cautious about the assumption new parks will automatically be popular.
Mario is behind Mickey, Pooh, Darth Vader, Yoda, Minnie/Donald/Pluto/Goofy, Spiderman, probably Iron Man, Anna and Elsa at a minimum.As far as a recognizable characters?? Mario is beyond Mickey Mouse at this point..
Consistently in Polls Mario gets far higher recognition/poularity than Picachu.Mario is behind Mickey, Pooh, Darth Vader, Yoda, Minnie/Donald/Pluto/Goofy, Spiderman, probably Iron Man, Anna and Elsa at a minimum.
Hell Mario isn't even the most recognizable Nintendo character. That would be Pikachu.
You searched Mario as a topic. I counter you with this one!
That's misleading. The first search query is for the wii and it peaked around the time it was being released.You searched Mario as a topic. I counter you with this one!
I completely agree with all of this, and I'll add... The problem I see with Nintendo as a theme park IP is that Nintendo games have always been laser-focussed on gameplay rather than storytelling. There are video games that play the role of movies, to tell you a compelling story and make you feel emotions and connections to the characters. Nintendo games, and Mario games in particular, are about gaming qua gaming. The point is to beat the levels for beating the levels's sake. Can you land that spin jump onto an icy platform? Can you figure out the attack pattern of the lava monster? Can you solve the puzzle that unlocks the secret pipe? The magic of Nintendo is that they execute on gameplay design better than anyone. They rarely publish a game that isn't perfectly coded and polished. But the characters and stories are an afterthought. That's why they've been reusing the same characters for 50 years. People love Mario games because they're great games, not because they're Mario.
It’s not just for the Wii, it’s for the entire series, and Mickey under any form has never peaked as high or even passed it once ever. Ideally there would be a character to character comparison but this is not misleading.That's misleading. The first search query is for the wii and it peaked around the time it was being released.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.