I haven't picked a camp just yet. But I think I'd rather see Imagineering challenged to create a new land vs "fixing" an old one. I do however want Dinosaur to remain. (albeit improved) Gut Dinorama for something else, something non-Dino or keeping the Dino theme. Doesn't matter to me so long as any new or improved theme, the land's supporting backstory and rides are actually good. There's room for improvement both figuratively and literally. (Looking at you Nemo!) Imagineering can do better.
Side note: Has anyone stopped to ask if this "new ride coming to Animal Kingdom" will be used elsewhere in the park? I know Dinoland USA is the strawman choice but there are other areas in DAK were a ride could be added.
Disney, please accept my very technical proposal for Kali's expansion.
Thanks
View attachment 397399
I'm quite intrigued by this rumor and feel like the response has been some tacit indication that it is true, so I'm cautiously optimistic about hearing something at D23. The sense I get that it would not be Zootopia, though it will be IP based. This is all just my opinion though based on the hints offered.
Personally, I hope Dinorama stays until the expand elsewhere in the park. I think the park needs more "stuff" before it loses two of its rides, especially one of the few that is all ages/low thrill. I also do not want to lose having a dinosaur area for the park which is appropriate and a nice compliment to the existing and imaged animals elsewhere.
Backside of ReservoirYou might want to go all the way around the main reservoir and pumping station.
The whole north of Australia is tropical, so it is definitely rainforests plural! Either way, I would have thought you could blend Australia fairly easily, even if you chose to go with eucalyptus forests where koalas, kangaroos, emus, echidnas lyrebirds, etc. all live without it seeming out of place in AK. They are also sort of of a mid-point between a jungle and the kind of desert that people might imagine when they think of Australia, anyway. You can add ferns to taste, really, when it comes to making it blend in.Australia's not known in the upper planet for it's rainforest(s?). It's most iconic animals aren't rainforesty. The US has two rainforests and it's seen as all buffaloes and wolves and horses and eagles and non-rainforest-bears.
You know South America with its huge swaths or rainforests and iconic jungle animals is going to the head of the line ahead of Australia if "Disney's Jungle Kingdom" sticks to its favorite biome.
The real question is where does Joe Rhode want to take several months-long "research trips"?The whole north of Australia is tropical, so it is definitely rainforests plural! Either way, I would have thought you could blend Australia fairly easily, even if you chose to go with eucalyptus forests where koalas, kangaroos, emus, echidnas lyrebirds, etc. all live without it seeming out of place in AK. They are also sort of of a mid-point between a jungle and the kind of desert that people might imagine when they think of Australia, anyway. You can add ferns to taste, really, when it comes to making it blend in.
Either way, my impression from years on these forums is that Australia has been more something fans have been interested in that anything that Disney has seriously considered since AK opened. Given the theme of the park, it would seem an obvious addition to me. Given the likelihood of anything without a recognisable IP getting green lit, it does not seem so obvious. The only way I can see it happening is if Finding Nemo 3 is put into production and we get Australia featuring Nemo & Friends.
I think this is 100% the right question to ask!The real question is where does Joe Rhode want to take several months-long "research trips"?
I was thinking they also removed the sound of chainsaws, and the large truck gunning its engine?Other than the fire being deactivated they’ve made no changes to the attraction or queue.
Yea I think Dinorama can wait and I rather they add a whole new land to AK first but both in my opinion should happen at the same time.
The whole north of Australia is tropical, so it is definitely rainforests plural! Either way, I would have thought you could blend Australia fairly easily, even if you chose to go with eucalyptus forests where koalas, kangaroos, emus, echidnas lyrebirds, etc. all live without it seeming out of place in AK. They are also sort of of a mid-point between a jungle and the kind of desert that people might imagine when they think of Australia, anyway. You can add ferns to taste, really, when it comes to making it blend in.
Either way, my impression from years on these forums is that Australia has been more something fans have been interested in that anything that Disney has seriously considered since AK opened. Given the theme of the park, it would seem an obvious addition to me. Given the likelihood of anything without a recognisable IP getting green lit, it does not seem so obvious. The only way I can see it happening is if Finding Nemo 3 is put into production and we get Australia featuring Nemo & Friends.
I always say the same thing!Not sure how, or maybe why, Goofy looking like he just came off of a 3-day bender is "appealing to contemporary audiences".
Would thy be able to simulate a desert in a place that gets daily thunderstorms?If we did get Australia, it would have to be the outback. We have the savannah and rainforest, the red desert and scrub would be a great addition
I think this is 100% the right question to ask!
I follow him on Instagram, and I've never seen him mention anything to do with Australia let alone post pictures of long outback research trips. So, I think we can scrub that off the list!
Don't forget the dry season in Florida. They could alternate between the outback and the tropical zone.Would thy be able to simulate a desert in a place that gets daily thunderstorms?
Does this rumor hold any weight with the insiders or just wishful thinking?
Other than the fire being deactivated they’ve made no changes to the attraction or queue.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.