News New Play Pavilion to replace Epcot's Wonders of Life

eliza61nyc

Well-Known Member
It is a very broad yes.
1981: Hunting
1982: Energy Turns the World
1984: The World of Rivers – Fresh Water as a Source of Life
1985: Dwellings and Surroundings – Science and Technology for Man at Home.
1985: Inventions
1986: Transportation and Communication: World in Motion – World in Touch
1988: Leisure in the Age of Technology
1991: The Activity of Young People in the Service of a World of Peace
1992: Christopher Columbus, The Ship and the Sea
1993: The Challenge of a New Road of Development
1998: The Oceans: A Heritage for the Future
2000: Man, Nature, Technology
2005: Nature’s Wisdom
2008: Water and Sustainable Development
2010: Better City, Better Life
2012: The Living Ocean and Coast
2015: Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life
2017: Future Energy
2020: Connecting Minds, Creating the Future
2023: Creative Industries in Digital Convergence
2025: Designing Future Society for Our Lives

Except Hunting and Christopher Columbus, those all sound a lot like Future World.


Nobody is saying they shouldn’t or can’t just have fun. But you are saying they should have no opportunity for something besides that thoughtless fun. What you don’t seem to recognize is that the fun you want would still be available to you if the park had a strong message, a theme, behind it. If you just want fun rides in a nice environment, those will still be offered by a good theme park. Just focusing on those rides and fun that you want means those wanting to experience a story told in built space will no longer have available.


To highlight what? The original and dominate focus is technology and the future.
to highlight the country itself. you know the place where the people live, arts, culture, food etc etc. I am not saying there is no opportunity for some thing else. I've got no horse in this race, because as I said many times I did not go during the golden years.
 

eliza61nyc

Well-Known Member
People don't know what they want...the genius of Disney is they created the want.. They gave people new ways to dream.
NOW they seem to be giving people what they want as opposed to creating new ideas...
lol oh the horror, a business actually giving the customer what they want. So basically we are ignorant people with too much money, to realize that we should hate the direction Disney is developing because we aren't longing for the by gone days. We couldn't possible know what we want.

352822
 
Last edited:

Missing20K

Well-Known Member
lol oh the horror, a business actually giving the customer what they want. So basically we are ignorant people with too much money, to realize that we should hate the direction Disney is developing because we aren't longing for the by gone days. We couldn't possible know what we want.

View attachment 352822
Thank heavens some guy decided he was tired of all the dirty amusement and trolley parks and went about creating a new industry that not a single consumer would have asked for or even knew they wanted.
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
I have to repeat the same argument over and over again when people inevitably gripe about changes to Epcot.

Disney wouldn't be making changes if the original concept was as successful as the diehard fans assume it was. None of these decisions are being made just to spite you.

You look at the 1982 park and see something like perfection. Others see a bunch of very similar slow-moving dark and boat rides with animatronics, no thrill rides, films which repeat the same "our spirit is our people" motif and a lot of corporate advertising masquerading as attractions.

No one saw the 1982 EPCOT Center as "something like perfection". And no thrill rides?!?!?!?! Why did they even build it?????

You can keep repeating the same argument over and over again. You'll keep being wrong, though, because it's a flawed argument.
 

LaughingGravy

Well-Known Member
We are at a point where the destination itself is so crowded, almost anything they do will sell out, with a few exceptions.
A lot of it is due to the vast number of rooms and hotels they added to the resort without adding appropriate capacity to the parks and then cutting a lot of the water activities due to alligators and bacteria.
River Country was doable if you were staying at a monorail resort. Do that in the morning and then do Epcot or MK in the afternoon/evening.
The existing water parks are too far away to justify the time spent away from the parks, so you kind of need to dedicate a whole day to do them.
Not everything needs to be justified as "it's a business", thus the up-charges for hours that used to be included and ridiculous parking fees, especially for those staying on site.
There used to be more altruistic motives in creating something new and exciting and people will come.
That was what Carousel of Progress, Space Mountain, the Haunted Mansion, Pirates, and the whole all encompassing resort with Bay Lake and water sports were all about. EPCOT Center did this through the huge variety of attractions, including all the different types of attractions in Future World.
I think they are doing that with the new gondolas and Star Wars land, though. I am glad Epcot is getting a re-work.
 
Last edited:

SteamboatJoe

Well-Known Member
They could update the park and still stay true to its original spirit. They've just chosen not to and it's not because it is a failing theme. In fact, I don't think the core concept is flawed or unacceptable to the market. Children's museum and science centers flourish throughout the country. It's the implementation, presentation, and upkeep of the theme that has been the problem. That and it doesn't jive with the goals of the accounting, marketing, and merchandising teams....the same types of people that gave us DCA 1.0.
 
Last edited:

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
They could update the park and still stay true to it's original spirit. They've just chosen not to and it's not because it is a failing theme. In fact, I don't think the core concept is flawed or unacceptable to the market. Children's museum and science centers flourish throughout the country. It's the implementation, presentation, and upkeep of the theme that has been the problem. That and it doesn't jive with the goals of the accounting, marketing, and merchandising teams....the same types of people that gave us DCA 1.0.
If EPCOT Center was such a failure they wouldn’t be wrapping the new Epcot in its imagery. EPCOT Center clearly has a cultural identity and very strong brand aweness that Disney intends to use.
 

SteamboatJoe

Well-Known Member
lol oh the horror, a business actually giving the customer what they want. So basically we are ignorant people with too much money, to realize that we should hate the direction Disney is developing because we aren't longing for the by gone days. We couldn't possible know what we want.

View attachment 352822

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”

While Henry Ford may or may not have said those lines, he, like other creative visionaries, clearly believed in that line of thinking.
 

SteamboatJoe

Well-Known Member
If EPCOT Center was such a failure they wouldn’t be wrapping the new Epcot in its imagery. EPCOT Center clearly has a cultural identity and very strong brand aweness that Disney intends to use.
Agreed, I didn't mean to imply it was a failing theme. Poor writing on my part.
 

SteamboatJoe

Well-Known Member
I was agreeing to you. Just pointing out that this supposed failure is the face of the new Epcot. It makes no marketing sense to use a failed brand for your new one.
Gotcha. Yes, that was my line of thinking. The continuous utilization of Figment, the upcoming interim IllumiNations replacement show celebrating EPCOT Center, and the 35th anniversary merchandise a while back are also a good examples to support this point.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
lol oh the horror, a business actually giving the customer what they want. So basically we are ignorant people with too much money, to realize that we should hate the direction Disney is developing because we aren't longing for the by gone days. We couldn't possible know what we want.

View attachment 352822
Wow did you take that the wrong direction....
 

Ladybat

Active Member
It seems to me that Disney is phasing out dark rides which is very sad for me as I always loved them the best. They butchered Horizons, Universe of Energy, and Journey Into Imagination. In 1993 those rides were some of the most fantastic WDW experiences that were ever made along with the dark rides of the Magic Kingdom.
 

Missing20K

Well-Known Member
If EPCOT Center was such a failure they wouldn’t be wrapping the new Epcot in its imagery. EPCOT Center clearly has a cultural identity and very strong brand aweness that Disney intends to use exploit.
FTFY. ;)

But in all seriousness, I find using all of the old EPCOT Center imagery absurd when there is a giant, hideous box housing a coaster about a movie in the park. It's a play to nostalgia and not in a good, or more importantly, coherent manner. Quite frankly, I find it to be a slap in the face of the more ardent fans of the product. Reminds me of Iger's tweet about Captiva Marvel and the 50 Rides.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom