News New Play Pavilion to replace Epcot's Wonders of Life

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
The difference, of course, is that this is replacing an entire, large EPCOT Pavilion - one that used to offer entertainment for all age groups, and now no longer will.
Apparently some adults like characters. No one, on the other hand, enjoyed Epcot sex ed. They struggle enough with pads being mentioned in Turning Red…

This is kind of like complaining that Mermaid “replaced” 20k Leagues Under the Sea. It really didn’t even if it kept a bit of the structure.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
It’s not like Play is displacing a thriving pavilion. It’s displacing a corpse.

I don't think that's really the point.

It's more that they have a location with existing attraction space that they are using for something they could have easily put in another existing structure, and they're not even using the attraction space. It just doesn't make much sense from a master planning standpoint -- it's an inefficient use of space.
 
Last edited:

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
Apparently some adults like characters. No one, on the other hand, enjoyed Epcot sex ed. They struggle enough with pads being mentioned in Turning Red…

This is kind of like complaining that Mermaid “replaced” 20k Leagues Under the Sea. It really didn’t even if it kept a bit of the structure.
The Wonders of Life facility is well capable of returning to meaningful function and hosting legitimate attractions, and has been. That was much less true for 20,000 Leagues - the Nemo Submarine Voyage at Disneyland somewhat proves that they could have revived the WDW Submarine Lagoon, but I fully recognize that have taken serious, serious work.

Point being that the comparison really isn't apples to apples. 20,000 Leagues was far less a traditional building than Wonders is. I enjoy characters plenty, but not so much that they prove a suitable use of a functioning building that once housed a theater show and simulator attraction, and could do so again without being fully gutted.

Not insisting that they revive Wonders as it was, just that better things could be done with what they have to work with. Perhaps instead of using the world "replace" better wording would have been for me to say that Play is "making use of a building that can, has, could, and should be used for much more".
 
Last edited:

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
The Wonders of Life facility is well capable of returning to meaningful function and hosting legitimate attractions, and has been. That was much less true for 20,000 Leagues - the Nemo Submarine Voyage at Disneyland somewhat proves that they could have revived the WDW Submarine Lagoon, but I fully recognize that have taken serious, serious work.

Point being that the comparison really isn't apples to apples. 20,000 Leagues was far less a traditional building than Wonders is. I enjoy characters plenty, but not so much that they prove a suitable use of a functioning building that once housed a theater show and simulator attraction, and could do so again without being fully gutted.

Not insisting that they revive Wonders as it was, just that better things could be done with what they have to work with. Perhaps instead of using the world "replace" better wording would have been for me to say that Play is "making use of a building that can, has, could, and should be used for much more".
I think that’s fair, but it is kind of replacing Innoventions space. Meanwhile, Innoventions is getting replaced with…some waterfalls and…?
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
It's more that they have a location with existing attraction space that they are using for something they could have easily put in another existing structure, and they're not even using the attraction space. It just doesn't make much sense from a master planning standpoint -- it's an inefficient use of space.
Does what they're doing actually impact the old theater and simulator areas? I don't think converting the dome itself into PLAY! is necessarily inefficient. The continued disuse of the attached spaces seems to be the actual problem, but it's a separate issue, I think.
 

Naplesgolfer

Well-Known Member
The biggest issue is that it would have made a lot more sense to leave the other half of Communicore standing and repurpose it into this kind of space. Then they could have used the former Wonders of Life location as some kind of new pavilion with actual attractions instead of leaving those attraction spaces shuttered.

That's a relatively simple change that would improve the spine and allow for more attractions; I don't really understand why they didn't do that.
I totally agree. The whole spine plan and so many other choices seem so opposite of what a seasoned theme park executive would logically choose. They seem to have no one who has any connection to what the park experience should be like. Executives with decision making authority need to quarterly go through the park's and experience them as their customers do. I don't think the C suite people realize how under built and dysfunctional some of their parks are.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Does what they're doing actually impact the old theater and simulator areas? I don't think converting the dome itself into PLAY! is necessarily inefficient. The continued disuse of the attached spaces seems to be the actual problem, but it's a separate issue, I think.

I meant that combined with demolishing Communicore/Innoventions and replacing it with basically nothing (at least as far as we know). What we know about the Play Pavilion could have easily gone in that space, leaving the former WoL pavilion and its attraction space available for something else. All of that together seems very inefficient to me -- it appears like there will be much less usable guest space than there would have otherwise been.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
I meant that combined with demolishing Communicore/Innoventions and replacing it with basically nothing (at least as far as we know). What we know about the Play Pavilion could have easily gone in that space, leaving the former WoL pavilion and its attraction space available for something else. All of that together seems very inefficient to me -- it appears like there will be much less usable guest space than there would have otherwise been.
I guess my thought is that, in my mind, there was never really anything of particular interest housed in the domed vestibule of Wonders anyway, so shifting something there isn’t any more or less efficient than it ever was. But I certainly agree that maintaining the other space and activating everything optimally would be ideal.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
I guess my thought is that, in my mind, there was never really anything of particular interest housed in the domed vestibule of Wonders anyway

It was definitely my least favorite pavilion. I barely remember it -- the only thing that comes to mind is the exercise bikes with video that was synced to your pedaling speed. I think either Disneyland or the Magic Kingdom was one of the options but there were others.
 
Last edited:

FigmentFan82

Well-Known Member
EPCOT is all about the progress of human culture, civilization, architecture, and ladders.
tumblr_m3xcx5w58Q1qakn55o7_250.gifv
tumblr_m3xcx5w58Q1qakn55o8_250.gifv
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
This is kind of like complaining that Mermaid “replaced” 20k Leagues Under the Sea. It really didn’t even if it kept a bit of the structure.

To me, this is more like when 20K was finally demolished and a corner of the site became Pooh's Playful Spot.

After years of sitting idle, an attraction with appeal to a wide audience is allocating some of its available space to an experience with a more limited target demographic.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom