britain
Well-Known Member
You mean it’s… GASP… not done yet!?
What criticisms does this address?You mean it’s… GASP… not done yet!?
What criticisms does this address?
No Sherlock.You mean it’s… GASP… not done yet!?
Pretty sure that comment was directed at the people constantly complaining about how it looks, not at you for asking if something was new.No Sherlock.
What are you going on about? I haven't been keeping up on pics due to travelling and sincerely wanted to know if what I saw was recently added or not. I made no implication that it was done. In fact, I posted that I heard people inside working.
If you have beef with me man up and spit it out. Otherwise keep to yourself.
Then why quote reply me and not make a general comment? It felt personal.Pretty sure that comment was directed at the people constantly complaining about how it looks, not at you for asking if something was new.
Not sure, that’s just how I interpreted it. I think you pointing out they were still improving it was just used as a jumping board to make a point to the naysayers that they’re still improving it. That’s just my interpretation though, I can’t speak for Britain, just trying to convey to you I don’t think it was meant to be personal, text is hard to decipher though.Then why quote reply me and not make a general comment? It felt personal.
Correct, not directed at chadwpalm. Sorry for the misunderstanding.Pretty sure that comment was directed at the people constantly complaining about how it looks, not at you for asking if something was new.
Because your photos are what prompted his response to the other people's conversation. He was just providing context to what he was talking about since there were multiple conversations happening at once.Then why quote reply me and not make a general comment? It felt personal.
Geez, leaning on stage and with their hands in their pockets. When I worked attractions, I'd of gotten a verbal/written warning from the NOCC team or possibly been fired for using that kind of body language too often "on stage". Hard to believe that was just over a decade ago.
Yeah, I was amazed by some of the scruffy-faced CM's with shirts untucked looking like they just rolled out of bed in their uniform. Standards have fallen. Too bad prices haven't.
It's just a tacky and sloppy way to run a business. What is he even doing there? Why? And no supervisor thinks to question that use of labor and staffing in California's very expensive business environment? Not to mention how on earth he is furthering the "story" of that attraction.
I got home last night from another Viking cruise and a post-cruise Immersion Trip (thanks WDI for that hilarious term!). It involved not just Viking, but several other "World Class" (using TDA's own words to describe themselves) hospitality companies and airlines.
I can confidently say that in 2024 it is still entirely possible for well run companies to uphold very high standards for their front line operational employees for attire, grooming, comportment, polish, and professionalism. While they work in a very well organized and expertly managed operation. Disney's theme parks have simply chosen on purpose to no longer strive for those heights, in an industry Disney invented and created for themselves and with standards they once set their own bar at.
That's what makes it all so sad at Disneyland nowadays; they purposely chose to do this to themselves.
I've heard this applied to many industries other than Disney as well and I believe they said that many of the people that had been in the workforce and knew everything and could teach the newer generations didn't come back to due retirement among other things. Combine that with possible people in the company being furloughed and not coming back could be a partial reason.I'm convinced that in 2020 TDA forgot what makes Disneyland great, and how to run the place.
It often feels like the park is being run by a different company or something.
Yet everyone jumps at the chance to give Disney thousands of dollars forIt's just a tacky and sloppy way to run a business. What is he even doing there? Why? And no supervisor thinks to question that use of labor and staffing in California's very expensive business environment? Not to mention how on earth he is furthering the "story" of that attraction.
I got home last night from another Viking cruise and a post-cruise Immersion Trip (thanks WDI for that hilarious term!). It involved not just Viking, but several other "World Class" (using TDA's own words to describe themselves) hospitality companies and airlines.
I can confidently say that in 2024 it is still entirely possible for well run companies to uphold very high standards for their front line operational employees for attire, grooming, comportment, polish, and professionalism. While they work in a very well organized and expertly managed operation. Disney's theme parks have simply chosen on purpose to no longer strive for those heights, in an industry Disney invented and created for themselves and with standards they once set their own bar at.
That's what makes it all so sad at Disneyland nowadays; they purposely chose to do this to themselves.
In n' Out's prices are still fairly cheap compared to the chains like McDonalds, Carl's Jr and Booger King.Funny how anyone can walk into an In n’ Out or a Chick-Fil-A and encounter—consistently—some of the friendliest, most professional, most enthusiastic employees in the country. No excuses, no B.S., just a lot of good people with self respect getting paid a decent wage for the hard work they do.
That's due to the monthly AP program. The park is no longer attempting to reach a value of $200 a day; instead they aim to be good enough for folks paying $20-$80 a visit or $50-$130 a month. They devalued the parks and as long as the majority of guests are getting the devalued price, they don't care about the poor suckers paying $200 per visit.Yet everyone jumps at the chance to give Disney thousands of dollars forWorldWalmart Class Service. On top of that, people here defend it! If it is from Disney it must be superior to all other forms of entertainment.
That's fine to the monthly AP program. The park is no longer attempting to reach a value of $200 a day; instead they aim to be good enough for folks paying $20-$80 a visit or $50-$130 a month. They devalued the parks and as long as the majority of guests are getting the devalued price, they don't care about the poor suckers paying $200 per visit.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.