disnyfan89
Well-Known Member
You’re the one trying to discredit the point so it seems you should be able to make the argument.
Again, what of that is stock architecture?
Actually I'm not trying to discredit any point. As stated, I simply was saying that sometimes its okay for a station to look like a station. I never said in any way if I agree the station should look like a stock station or not. You are the one who is trying to prove me wrong on an argument I wasn't trying to make.
I would then also ARGUE that you seem unable to define or provide an example of what a "Stock" station looks like and therefore are unable to make an argument against me to prove your own point and have no basis to judge what is or is not stock architecture which completely discredits your entire argument.