Curious Constance
Well-Known Member
That makes sense but I really don't think the hotel owners are very concerned about convenience for the guests as much as they are worried about loosing revenue for those patrons that do step out of resort to go use the small restaurants that they have on hotel properties.
Unless A guest Is staying directly across the crosswalk there is still walking involved.
The additional waking created by this bridge is the depth of the demolished hotel property. If they add entrances at back of all hotels people can cut in directly into their room property.
I know some say that the extra walk of the bridge adds to the walk but that is only if the hotel room is close to the hotel entrance off harbor. That is a small percentage of guests. The majority of guests have to walk past the eateries and go deep into the hotel properties already therefor waking the same depth distance as what the bridge adds.
I really think that there has to be an understanding between everyone and see that at the end the negative cause and effect is minimal.
I bet that no one on the hotel side has done studies and see how much additional walking is really added if they were to work with Disney and create back entrances to hotels.
That all makes sense. We're almost always at the back end of the property. If they had built the bridge, would the bridge let out right at the end of the Harbor hotel properties, or further back?