NobodyElse
Well-Known Member
Or, another option would be for the pedestrian bridge to actually not draw attention to itself.
Or, another option would be for the pedestrian bridge to actually not draw attention to itself.
I think some classy place-making on Harbor wouldn't be a bad thing. A commercial strip like Harbor that funtions as Disneyland Resort's "front door" might benefit from having a more striking pedestian overpass to give the Anaheim Resort district more of a unique identity. Lord knows high design isn't going to come from the businesses across the street from Disneyland.
People with a fear of heights would be out of luck.
People with a fear of heights would be out of luck.
I'm still confused as to why WDW is building the Roosevelt Island tram from Kongfrontation instead of just expanding/overhauling the Monorail.
I think the overpass bridge should be designed to match Captain Kidd's Family Dining. Who's with me?Gosh, yes! Modern architecture today has gotten very elegant and pleasing, with awesome night effects available with all the new LED lighting technologies. Harbor Blvd. shouldn't be defined by the cinder block International House of Pancakes and Panera Bread #873.
Free salmonella vaccine shots on your way out.I think the overpass bridge should be designed to match Captain Kidd's Family Dining. Who's with me?
Now that's Disney magic!Free salmonella vaccine shots on your way out.
Remember the Eisner years when Disney prided itself on its architecture but built second rate parks. Now it seems to be the complete opposite.
He did so with fairness though. It wasn't just backstage/corporate locations. He had starchitects develop some of the earliest resorts at Walt Disney World outside of Seven Seas Lagoon. He brought over some leadership from Marriott but ditched them to allow WDI to develop their own hotels because their ideas were so much more fanciful and fun than what outside operators were offering. He also presided over MGM studios and Animal Kingdom. It wasn't until later in his tenure, once WDW had ballooned basically to what it is today, that he entered the darker phase of his career and lost his way not only with parks, but with all divisions of the company. Sadly, theme parks are permanent, unlike a crappy film, that disappears and is quickly forgotten.View attachment 221638
Remember the Eisner years when Disney prided itself on its architecture but built second rate parks. Now it seems to be the complete opposite.
He did so with fairness though. It wasn't just backstage/corporate locations. He had starchitects develop some of the earliest resorts at Walt Disney World outside of Seven Seas Lagoon. He brought over some leadership from Marriott but ditched them to allow WDI to develop their own hotels because their ideas were so much more fanciful and fun than what outside operators were offering. He also presided over MGM studios and Animal Kingdom. It wasn't until later in his tenure, once WDW had ballooned basically to what it is today, that he entered the darker phase of his career and lost his way not only with parks, but with all divisions of the company. Sadly, theme parks are permanent, unlike a crappy film, that disappears and is quickly forgotten.
I just really don't like that Disney put a crappy post-modern outlet mall right outside of Disneyland. There should be a clear cut between the outside world and the parks. A clear, obvious beginning to the show. The story and the effort and the careful masterful design that you are paying to experience beginsss HERE. Unlike universal, whose Citywalk is more exciting than half the theme park
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.