Undoubtedly. They are going to milk it for all its worth until they can't.I think it'll be both VQ and ILL, no standby.
Undoubtedly. They are going to milk it for all its worth until they can't.I think it'll be both VQ and ILL, no standby.
But again it does not seem like the amount of “abusers” are the issue its the system and what disney allows guest to do with DAS. My family needs DAS no questions asked but i also fully admit there are attractions we will ride 3 times in a day fully within Disneys rules and guidelines we are 3 people in total. Im sure im not the only one. Am i abusing/wrong for this? Disney should limit re rides imoI was referring specifically to the option to leave a line and come back if one needs to use the bathroom due to a medical condition.
This meets the need while taking away the front of the line access that attracts more cheaters.
DAS should only allow one ride per day using DAS, just like Genie+.I don't think Disney is required to allow unlimited repeat rides as an accommodation.
The expectation for most guests would be doing a given attraction once per day. DAS provides the equivalent opportunity to users.
In this case, it's an accommodation to provide the "opportunity" to ride an attraction that they would otherwise not be able to ride. And I think that line has been blurred beyond oblivion over the last 10+ years.People really do understand this; not participating is always an option. The entire point of the ADA is to make life more pleasant and normal for people who have disabilities.
Yeah, I said this before, but I think that Disney actually feels that most are lying about their bathroom issues. Many don't comprehend how serious they are. I think that Disney thinks that hardly anyone is going to ask to leave the line. They will be in for a surprise.I think a big part of this could be trying to curtail use and abuse by requiring people to confirm their need in person.
It's one thing to lie once during an online process and then having that DAS access for the day or week. It's another thing to have to look a cast member in the eye throughout the day and lie about not being able to stay in line.
It's also less convenient that a standard DAS. This process could meet needs but lesson the advantage of front of the line access. It will discourage cheaters.
I agree and i remember when GAC was changed to DAS and everyone was in an uproar. I was like okay great. It still provides me what i need. Granted forcing someone with a disability depending on what theirs was to go from ride to ride to book that attraction was ridiculous but at the time it was the only way.This is always a fascinating conversation about going to an amusement park. This is not a daily need or critical use we are discussing, but a completely voluntary recreational activity.
If one can’t wait in line, be in crowds, or handle loud noises, perhaps consider entertainment options that are more suited to what you can enjoy vs expecting a theme park operator to fundamentally redesign the entire concept of a day at an amusement park to address your specific needs?
My wife is deathly scared of heights - so she doesn’t go skiing nor require the ski resort to drive her up the slopes on a snowmobile so she can avoid the chairlift
There is a point where “demanding accommodation” crosses over to “unrealistic narcissism”.
Obviously this is not possible because there are folks who require it for literally every single attraction. However, I do wonder if there is a middle ground for those who have these more transient/unpredictable issues; not full DAS but 1 pass to provide added flexibility.DAS should only allow one ride per day using DAS, just like Genie+.
Sorry, that wasn't very clear ~ what I meant was you should only be able to ride each ride once (no re-rides), just like Genie+.Obviously this is not possible because there are folks who require it for literally every single attraction. However, I do wonder if there is a middle ground for those who have these more transient/unpredictable issues; not full DAS but 1 pass to provide added flexibility.
Ah! Got it, my bad.Sorry, that wasn't very clear ~ what I meant was you should only be able to ride each ride once (no re-rides), just like Genie+.
As a DAS user to me this is the biggest issue imo that is causing this. As ive stated im guilty of re rides but i would not be upset if they changed it to say only 1 ride per day and say a 2nd must only be yourself and 1 other and cap it there. I know in theory its not the same as a regular guest BUT its more than a fair and reasonable accommodationDAS should only allow one ride per day using DAS, just like Genie+.
But DAS isn't an alternative to Genie+. It is an alternative method of waiting for your standby time. If standby guests can queue over and over again for Small World, telling DAS they cannot would be restricting DAS guests to different services than what is available to standby.DAS should only allow one ride per day using DAS, just like Genie+.
Sorry, that was my mistake for the poor wording.Ah! Got it, my bad.
Why? They are still waiting in a standby line, albeit “virtually”. So if standby guests can wait repeatedly for a a ride, why shouldn’t those with DAS not be allowed?DAS should only allow one ride per day using DAS, just like Genie+.
This. We are almost 80 pages in and people are STILL misrepresenting what DAS does or allows users to do.But DAS isn't an alternative to Genie+. It is an alternative method of waiting for your standby time. If standby guests can queue over and over again for Small World, telling DAS they cannot would be restricting DAS guests to different services than what is available to standby.
This would be the only way I can see this working without causing an entirely new issue to fix.Am I misunderstanding the return to line accommodation? If the standby is an hour, you get 20 minutes in, and need to leave the line, you come back to the exact spot correct? Meaning you still need to come back and wait the 40 minutes? I can’t see people looking for a “hack” wanting to use this or “cheat” it
1. This a reasonable take. There are different levels of disability hence why Disney is making more various options that affect operations less (with the added benefit of more money in their pocket)The issue is that this DAS thing has grown to the point where people think if they have any personal nuance that makes it uncomfortable to stand in a long line (even if not associated with a medical diagnosis), that they are entitled to a disability pass.
Why not Acrophobia? All 3 of these things are real, but also easy to just say if you want to get a pass.
Sorry, I made they assumption that it wasn't at the level of acrophobia.Acrophobia is a mental health condition that is considered an anxiety disorder. So yes, it could be viewed as a disability.
What I would change is the shaving off time it does for waiting that standby time. If it's a 15 minute posted wait, you can't just walk in immediately or not even book it(you can just show the CM your pass if its 15min or less), wait the 15min if it's meant to replace stand-byThis. We are almost 80 pages in and people are STILL misrepresenting what DAS does or allows users to do.
Changes were needed, but if you’re gonna criticize the program whole cloth, make sure you get your facts right.
But come on now its not realistic someone would do that and also if the issue is rerides and party size find a way to fix that. Im saying this as A DAS userBut DAS isn't an alternative to Genie+. It is an alternative method of waiting for your standby time. If standby guests can queue over and over again for Small World, telling DAS they cannot would be restricting DAS guests to different services than what is available to standby.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.