As I said, I don't expect Disney to change anything right now, and I doubt they would ever do the things I've suggested. If, as reports seem to suggest, LLs are shorter, and standby lines are moving more consistently, then I'm all good with what has been done, so long as they keep it up.They did the vicinity (actually having to go to ride thing) was one or biggest complaints. You are asking someone with a disability already to now walk and potentially criss cross the park?!? I see your time limit point but you can only book 1 at a time so what does that really prove unless you make it say an hour to prevent people and yes im guilty of it booking while say eating a character dinner or breakfast which takes time. Not allowing someone to walk on a ride basically is kinda pointless bc anyone with a real disability and need most likely cant wait more than say 20 minutes. The re rides are the biggest concern as ive been quoted as saying and to me the way you fix that is simply telling guests that after you use it you need to wait X amt of time before booking that same ride again. I know i have had drawback on this suggestion but again if some DAS users were not so greedy and expect the world without giving anything back we most likely are not having this conversation…
But the fact is that there is no reason for the disabled (or anyone else, for that matter) to criss-cross the park for rides unless they choose to do so. And if a DAS user chooses to do a ride on the other side of the park, I personally don't find it unreasonable to expect them to actually be there when they book, just like someone without a DAS would have to be there to enter the line.
As for the end time limit, in my mind, that's more about being able to have a better idea of potential demand in an LL at any given time. Now, Disney may well (and probably does) have all sorts of mathematical models based on DAS usage since it became electronic via the app, so they are most likely able to adjust same-day LLMP sales so based on sales and projected DAS usage.
And I agree 100000% with your last sentence.