TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
I believe you are wrong.There doesn't have to be a discussion of any kind at all. You have no legal right to that.
I believe you are wrong.There doesn't have to be a discussion of any kind at all. You have no legal right to that.
Why? Just saying the words “legally required” doesn’t make it so.I believe you are wrong.
Because I believe the ADA requires it. If you believe they don’t that’s fine - one day we will all find out when this goes to court! Haha.Why? Just saying the words “legally required” doesn’t make it so.
Laws aren’t a matter of belief. There’s nothing in the ADA that supports what you’re saying.Because I believe the ADA requires it. If you believe they don’t that’s fine - one day we will all find out when this goes to court! Haha.
And from a customer service perspective - I would expect them to answer questions and be patient - just like they are patient when I ask questions about what resorts are available.
I don't just 'believe' - I read the actual law, federal register, and guidelines. You're the one making the assertion it's in there... so point it out where it is if you want others to 'believe' along with youBecause I believe the ADA requires it. If you believe they don’t that’s fine - one day we will all find out when this goes to court! Haha.
I do as well - our interpretations differ. It’s fine.I don't just 'believe' - I read the actual law, federal register, and guidelines.
Well provide a cite and we'll see. Until then.. it's just .... 'opinion'I do as well - our interpretations differ. It’s fine.
But what provision in the ADA are you interpreting? Please cite the section and the wording.I do as well - our interpretations differ. It’s fine.
Either way we agree it’s good customer service - I hope that is the case!
Great it’s my opinion - again let’s agree that it’s good customer service - I’m not wanting to argue. Let’s find where we agreeWell provide a cite and we'll see. Until then.. it's just .... 'opinion'
Are they actually recorded? I haven't done one with the new use of zoom, and I don't recall being told in the past that the video call was being recorded. I do believe the t&c for the new interviews explicitly states that guests may not record the call - can Disney record if they're telling guests that it's prohibited?I’m surprised by all these accounts. These conversations are recorded, the CMs are accountable for what’s said (the recordings could pop up in a lawsuit) and the CMs have no particular reason to be so upset that they lapse into rudeness. Disney should try to avoid hiring such thin-skinned people. If that’s what’s happening.
I thought I read here that they were, but I think I was wrong. It wouldn’t be right to record calls that could contain sensitive information.Are they actually recorded? I haven't done one with the new use of zoom, and I don't recall being told in the past that the video call was being recorded. I do believe the t&c for the new interviews explicitly states that guests may not record the call - can Disney record if they're telling guests that it's prohibited?
(I truly don't know. I live in a one-party consent state, but that's only been a discussion I've been involved with in the context of parents being able to record IEP meetings without requiring consent from the district to do so - but once we start publicly recording in the meeting we can't prevent the district from also recording, and I believe I would also have to give the district a copy of my recording if they were unable to make their own once I started (assuming they asked for it)).
Fingers crossed it goes well.Im at my 30 day mark for our trip to Disneyland and plan to try getting DAS over the weekend.
Has there been many stories of those with Autistic Children getting refused DAS.
I’m fairly certain that’s been debunked. This is a copy of the wording, it is possible it was changed once they started the new system.I do believe the t&c for the new interviews explicitly states that guests may not record the call
I still wonder what people feel the right solution is. With 50,000 visitors a day, how can Disney accommodate every single person who believes they should have DAS, as well as lightning lane users, as well as standby guests, without making it a horrible experience for one or more of those groups?
For a start, Disney should have modified the program by limiting the number of guests per party, and being a little more diligent in saying no to the full on liars who were truly abusing the system.I still wonder what people feel the right solution is.
Part of the issue is how they now make suggestions for what people should do when they're denied DAS. I've read multiple reports of adults with IBS, for ex, being told by the CM on the call to wear a diaper. I appreciate the intent to help people being denied DAS figure out a way that they can still access Disney, but I can also see why people feel frustration/embarrassment/humiliation/anxiety, etc when a CM who knows very little about their disability and who isn't a medical professional is suggesting to wear a diaper. While it may be a valid suggestion, I can think of few adults, disabled or not, that would react well to what is essentially a complete stranger telling them to wear a diaper.I still wonder what people feel the right solution is. With 50,000 visitors a day, how can Disney accommodate every single person who believes they should have DAS, as well as lightning lane users, as well as standby guests, without making it a horrible experience for one or more of those groups? There has to be some give on all sides. I’m okay waiting a little longer because of DAS or paid lightning lane users, but the DAS numbers were unsustainable before the changes.
No matter what, someone will be unhappy. If they’re too lenient it creates problems like before. If they’re too strict people are upset that they didn’t qualify, but it keeps the lines moving for everyone else. They just need to find the proper balance. There also are other accommodates besides just DAS. And ultimately, just like the rest of us, you have the option to buy Genie+. Yes it sucks to have to pay, but that’s true for everyone.
And how do you propose that Disney determine who the "full on liars" are? Medical documentation does nothing, since it is not only easily faked, but also it normally focuses on diagnosis rather than need.For a start, Disney should have modified the program by limiting the number of guests per party, and being a little more diligent in saying no to the full on liars who were truly abusing the system.
Evaluating from there would have been reasonable.
But how do you tell that someone’s lying without misjudging that? I’m sure people knew exactly what to say to qualifyFor a start, Disney should have modified the program by limiting the number of guests per party, and being a little more diligent in saying no to the full on liars who were truly abusing the system.
Evaluating from there would have been reasonable.
Agreed, but sadly Disney as a whole seems against that, preferring to replace and reskin and not add to the parks. Hopefully the Big Thunder project happens and is actually a substantial addition to the parkBuilding a lot more capacity will go along way
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.