Splash4eva
Well-Known Member
Stealing is allowed in this country now… at least in NYC it isLike Walmart letting people steal and steal and steal until it adds up to felony charges
Stealing is allowed in this country now… at least in NYC it isLike Walmart letting people steal and steal and steal until it adds up to felony charges
People could be reasoning that avoiding waiting in lines is not the kind of accommodation contemplated by the ADA since it‘s a subject (unlike design standards) that is completely left out. Or they could be thinking that a return to line system would be sufficient to meet the reasonable accommodation requirement under the circumstance where Disney’s business model is having people stand in lines unless they pay to avoid them.That was my point. A number of people keep referring to things like “the guidelines” and “the requirements” as though there are specific rules already spelled out. They don’t exist. So one cannot claim that Disney is following specific regulations that don’t exist. Even the design standards, which are very specific and prescriptive, don’t cover a lot of scenarios.
Even the physical accessibility requirements are a bit of a mess in terms of enforcement. In a lot of jurisdictions a standard has not been adopted so there is little to no review. There are also too many jurisdictions that don’t understand that a local government cannot waive federal requirements. That’s how you get so many stories of small businesses being sued despite having a relatively new facility.Beyond physical accessibility requirements that have been incorporated into building codes and local code enforcement... its down to civil challenges to enforce anything ADA.
I’m 6’-4” but thankfully a lot of my height is in my torso. It does make me want to duck on SMLeg room
The boat rides…space mountain…
Not great for those in higher altitudes
Sure. But not in a way that greatly diminishes experiences of the majority of paying guests.Can we all agree that we WANT WDW to go “above and beyond” for all customers? And especially for those with disabilities?
We don’t want the bare minimum fireworks show, and we don’t want the bare minimum in hotel cleanliness… we want the Disney service that made us all fall in love with Disney.
A reasonable accommodation to a guest’s disability that doesn’t fundamentally alter the company’s ability to provide goods and services to the rest of the public. The OP suggested these new accommodations would be struck down by a court.You and others keep talking about “what’s required” so why not point us to these requirements?
They're not allowed to ride anything else using the disability accommodations. At universal and other regional parks using this we could ride other attractions via standby if it worked for us.They go up to the exit of the attraction, get a return time to board and are not allowed to ride anything til that time is up.
I’m 6’3 and haven’t had an issue with anything at MKI’m 5’11” and i haven’t had a problem. Racking my brain trying to think which ones you mean. Maybe HM because the side seats have a lower ceiling?
What does that mean? I’ve waited an extra 5-10 minutes for a chair to be loaded onto a jungle cruise boat. Is that ok?Sure. But not in a way that greatly diminishes experiences of the majority of paying guests.
Only for the attractions built prior to the ADA that are not accessible via the standby queueThat’s not always the case at Disney…. Many attractions especially at Disneyland use the exit just like you described.
Indy was built after ADAOnly for the attractions built prior to the ADA that are not accessible via the standby queue
I’m 6’7” and the opposite…eating kneesI’m 6’-4” but thankfully a lot of my height is in my torso. It does make me want to duck on SM
The design standards require an accessible route to the load area but that route does not have to follow the queue.Only for the attractions built prior to the ADA that are not accessible via the standby queue
Just because someone has a disability and needs DAS to spend the day at a theme park doesn’t mean their employer has records of their disability.They wouldn't have to. A simple workflow could be as follows...
User registers for DAS with a developmental disability that has been concluded prevents them from waiting in a queue. Their name and details go into the computer. System can identify they are an employee and they get flagged.
Later, a second system reviews all employees who qualified for DAS and compares their work history and accommodations. If by some pre-determined rules of intersection of key data points happen, you boil the record up for manual evaluation. Someone in HR can review by inspecting the person's responsibilities, documented accommodations or reported limitations, and comparing with the DAS request.
Disney's purpose isn't to deny them the DAS when they apply - you don't want to deny people something they may need. Instead you post-analyze the data to look for irregularities, screen, and bubble up ones that methodically that seem suspicious. Then you assess, and either dismiss the alert, or take some other action of your choosing.
Point is, you make it an employee issue - not a denying accommodations issue. If someone ultimately is lying to get DAS, they put their park privileges and employer/employee relationship at risk... you don't try to screen them out of getting a DAS. You leave the rope...
This is actually hilarious to me!I’m 6’-4” but thankfully a lot of my height is in my torso. It does make me want to duck on SM
Been there done that lmao. Daddy whats wrong? HahahahI’m 6’3 and haven’t had an issue with anything at MK
Unless my daughter pulls down the lap bar on the Barnstormer before I’m fully in position
Just because someone has a disability and needs DAS to spend the day at a theme park doesn’t mean their employer has records of their disability.
It’s not that tightThis is actually hilarious to me!
Up until last year I actually thought I hated Space Mountain because I always felt sick at the end of it.
It turned out I was making myself sick by crouching through the whole thing, as if being 6’3 was somehow dangerous for that ride. Now that I’ve forced myself to sit up straight I love it
That’s not specific guidelines or regulations.A reasonable accommodation to a guest’s disability that doesn’t fundamentally alter the company’s ability to provide goods and services to the rest of the public. The OP suggested these new accommodations would be struck down by a court.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.