Really? You do realize what the first "W" in "WDW" stands for, right? Unfortunately, WDW apparently agrees with you, now that traditions is basically a 15 minute presentation (exaggeration for the purpose of contrasting modern WDW against earlier WDW). So long as "Walt" is in "Walt Disney World," he deserves to be brought into the discussion.
Should all artists who have since passed away be left out of modern day discussions pertaining to their art? I thought that we valued the artistic vision more than that...
In a nutshell, Walt would probably not have suggested that his CMS lower themselves to the level of rude guests with a two-wrongs-make-a-right mentality. That's a sign of immaturity and lacking the experience to understand what other responses are more appropriate under the circumstances.
[COLOR="DarkOrchid"
Anyway, it is hard to believe how people will act/behave in front of their children. I have tried to instill in mine to treat all people respectfully, especially people who do jobs that most others wouldn't even consider. I have told them because someone is a janitor or a trashman doesn't mean they are better than them, they should be appreciative of the work they do. [/COLOR]
Actually, here's a quote from above:
Google the phrase "call him out." Unless we have different understandings of what "call him out" means, this is indicative of a lack of maturity and would essentially constitute lowering one's self to the level of the rude guest's immaturity. Not to mention the irony in the suggestion that this could be done "while staying in character." This behavior is outright contradictory to the character that a CM portrays. :brick:
Is calling out a guest the best way to handle a rude guest? No. Of course, if you think that the answer is "yes," you are definitely entitled to your opinion.
... I agree with all of Timekeeper's points, although I'm not sure with the method they have all been expressed. He's not saying that the CM's shouldn't get frustrated. Just that there is a time and place for handling those frustrations and anywhere on stage is NOT the time nor place. Timekeeper, correct me if I'm wrong with that. ...
BigThunderMatt, I don't know how CM's put up with the crap they do. I make sure I note the name of each CM I have contact with and use it. We also fill out a "complement" card at Guest Services card with a complement when appropriate. 99% of the CM's do an outstanding job.
Maybe i was not clear but to me when i say "calling them out" means that i tell them they are being extremely rude and that it is unwarranted and that if they do it again or continue with me i will have them escorted off property.
You don't have that authority. :wave:
I do...one little call to security and i could have anyone escorted off property :wave:
I know you wish that it worked that way, but it doesn't. Security will not remove someone for behavior that you might consider rude or argumentative.:wave:
...one little call to security and i could have anyone escorted off property :wave:
I know you wish that it worked that way, but it doesn't. Security will not remove someone for behavior that you might consider rude or argumentative.:wave:
We just returned from DW. The CM's we dealt with were wonderful. The bus drivers were always friendly and greeted us with a smile. My husband is on a scooter and I know how they are extra work for the bus drivers. I also remembered to say please and thank you to CM's and tell them to have a good day. It is important as a guest to make them feel good too. I found some guest who crossed our path had no regard for anyone else but themselves. They ran, jumped, waved their arms in the air with no regard for who was around them. I was walking and could have been run into many times if I hadn't been aware of my surroundings. :wave:
Clever Name is correct, but I'm also willing to believe that bullsforthewin may have had experiences with successfully having guests escorted off property (guests that fall within the "crossing the line" level of rudeness discussed below).
Security's decision (to remove a guest from property) is obviously made on case-by-case basis. There are a number of factors that go into their decision, but they do not automatically decide to remove a guest at the mere recommendation of a frustrated CM. For example, they will also consider the nature and severity of the CM's accusation as to what happened, the credibility of CM, and their own interaction with the accused guest upon responding to the call. A college aged kid drinking with his friends who continues to act argumentative and combative is more likely to get "walked out" than a middle aged parent visiting with his/her family who immediately admits that he/she was wrong and is apologetic - even though they both committed the same "rude" (but not illegal) act. It's always security's decision, not the decision of the CM who calls security.
As Clever Name suggested, what most people generally understand to be "rude behavior" will almost never lead to a guest being escorted off property. (If that were the case, we would all have experience witnessing guests being removed from property because we all have experience witnessing rude guests.) "Rude behavior" is a very vague term, though, and covers a very wide spectrum of behavior.
We might all agree that it's "rude" for a park guest to stop halfway down the isle in a theater, or use a flash in a no-flash-photography attraction, but those guests will be staying in the park. On the other end of the spectrum is behavior that "crosses the line," and is often not only "rude," but also "illegal." As example of this is behavior that leads to offensive contact between the guest and another guest or CM. ...and there's everything in between.
The point where bullsforthewin loses credibility is in stating that "I could have anyone escorted off property." That's simply not true (probably because it's an intended exaggeration of a point that he's trying to make).
The only scenario that explains why he believes this to be true is that he might have (for example) made 5 calls to security in 5 instances of when guests grossly crossed over the line, and those guests were walked out in each of those 5 instances. I suppose that could give someone the impression that "I could have anyone escorted off property." And I suppose that if someone stands 3 feet in front of a basketball hoop and makes 5 consecutive shots, they might truly believe that they could then "make any shot on the court"... Okay, maybe not. :brick: Regardless, when bullsforthewin states that "I could have anyone escorted off property," "anyone" includes everyone on this board, which I can safely assume we would all disagree with.
Lots of behavior is "rude," and if we label behavior as "rude," we are automatically attaching a negative label to that behavior. That's easy to do. But as Clever Name suggested, "rude" behavior - alone - is not sufficient (in most cases) to have a guest escorted off property. If a CM called security and only said to them "This guest was rude to me," security would respond, "You gotta give me a little bit more to go on here...", and probably holding back a chuckle. Security would need more details, which is why situations are handled on a case by case basis. Thus, the "rude" label is simply insufficient to suggest that a guest deserves to be removed. If that were the case, we would all be contacting security every 5 minutes each time we visit WDW in order to have "rude" guests removed.
Lastly, as a related side note, CMs are trained to specifically refrain from using "removed from the park" and "trespassed" as potential consequences when speaking with "rude" guests. CMs can remind guests of the conduct guidelines and inform them that security may be called to assist in any given matter (which basically alludes to a removal consequence), but CMs are not supposed to "threaten" guests with a "behave or you'll be removed from the park" type of remark (unless it's a security CM, because their presence would indicate a "last resort" attempt to bring the guest into compliance with appropriate conduct). Let me know if things have changed and it is now appropriate for CMs to make these "threats," because this policy is also followed at other theme parks, so it would be interesting if WDW now allows/recommends it.
I think you're being overly literal when you quote "I could have anyone escorted off property". My reading of the quote is a more reasonable one, that the poster could have anyone escorted off, based on the assumption that said "anyone" had clearly gone "beyond the line". Your extrapolation that the quote inferred that he could have everyone [any individual at all, regardless of circumstance] escorted out is entirely unrealistic.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.