Wow, I don't think I have ever heard anyone knock MV like that before. It really doesn't make any sense to me but opinons are opinions and you certainly have a right to yours. I'm curious though, what do you and your daughter think of Tough to Be A Bug? That show has the same immersive show format that MV has. What I mean by that is there are numerous in-theater effects that make the film come alive and make it more than just another 3D movie.
Again, this is somewhat shocking to me and makes absolutely no sense. Would you say that a bare bones show like Philarmagic, because it's newer, contains updated effects and less dated technology? MV technology still stands up to today's standards because the bar has been lowered ever since TOT opened. MV contains fantastic A100 figures, a "walking" animatronic, multiple show action equipment gags, a theater that blows up, advanced animation behind the audience, all the usual 4D effects and now digital projection. There are a number of clever details in this show, for example, the animated arrows that protrude out of the wall, that it is unlike any other automated show anywhere. Can someone please tell me how any 4D show in the world, with the exception of It's Tough to Be a Bug, can stand up to the innovation and technology in MV?
LOL calm down. I realize people have different opinions than me. That's why I said the following in my first post regarding this enigma in response to twizzy17's post, "It really doesn't make any sense to me but opinons are opinions and you certainly have a right to yours."
I'm not "demanding" an explanation. I'm simply encouaraging a discussion because it's interesting to me. I worked on the design team for this show and so perhaps I would be a bit more interested in someone claiming that audiences are not reacting positively when that goes against all the information I receive and opposite from my personal experience.
