Monty
Brilliant...and Canadian
- In the Parks
- No
The "small perk" is not offered because Disney is being nice to guests. It's offered to allow them to tell staff to stay home without pay when a certain number of guests take advantage of the offer.The over-the-top hyperbole and drama, not to mention the general lack of sensitivity to other people, never ceases to amaze me on these boards. Normally, I just ignore it and move on, as engaging is generally counterproductive.
But this is ludicrous. If someone is offered the option of opting out of Mousekeeping and accepts, they are not being a decent human being? Everyone on this thread who says they have opted out doesn't care about poor people? Oh shut up.
We're not talking about refusing to feed starving children in Ethiopia here. We're talking about a tiny, tiny percentage of Disney resort guests taking advantage of a small perk offered by Disney to them for foregoing a particular service. Whether or not someone chooses to forego Mousekeeping or not has nothing to do with whether or not they are a decent human being.
Seriously, sometimes I wonder if the Internet has really been a benefit to society...
Whether you care or not, I do. I choose to be nice to Mousekeepers. It is precisely because of my "sensitivity to other people" that I not only don't avail myself of this "perk", but also that I advise others of the underlying impact of their decision to do so that they may very well be unaware of. Speaking of "over-the-top hyperbole and drama", at no point have I suggested that people not avail themselves of the option, nor have I stated that my choosing to be a decent human being automatically assumes that others aren't, you read that into it all by yourself.
Last edited: