Where did you guys get $75 million for E.E.?
All the sites state $100 million as its official cost to build.
All the sites state $100 million as its official cost to build.
MartyMouse said:Could you post a link to where Disney discloses how much they spend on developing rides, I’m sure it’s fascinating to see how costs have skyrocketed over the years. Also I’m curious to see it because I didn’t think even the stock holders (and my son is one) had access to that information.
animal_king1990 said:Where did you guys get $75 million for E.E.?
All the sites state $100 million as its official cost to build.
animal_king1990 said:Then why do sites all list E.E's cost as $100 million? Even the official announcement says it's gonna take $100 million.
Thrawn said:I can't see ToT costing $75m, because freefall rides don't cost that much. I could see $50m, but thats being generous and giving about $20-25m to theming.
Thrawn said:Mission:Space was about $220 million in disclosed costs
I don't think ToT was that expensive. Freefall rides aren't.
By comparison, Everest is in the $75 million range.
Walt Sent Me said:I guess we will just have to agree to disagree. lol
Thrawn, how much did Test Track Cost? Maybe the $300 million figure is the sum of World of Motion along with the TT construction.
Where did you guys get $75 million for E.E.?
All the sites state $100 million as its official cost to build.
Montu said:Actually, SPACE was a several million dollars above the $220 (though under $300)... Believe it or not, it's the most expensive theme park attraction built to date, and not nearly the draw it was thought to be during conception.
The approximate price someone gave for Tower of Terror is actually quite close to the actual - though just a million or two above.
Thing to understand here - you CANNOT go by what Disney publically says the cost of an attraction is, because anything that cost a lot of money is always called "$100 million" -- regaurdless of how many tens of millions above that number the actual cost was.
animal_king1990 said:Besides, the cost to remove land and build pathways is not included in a ride's cost.
Thrawn said:It used an existing ride system, didn't do anything "revolutionary", and for the most part used an existing building.
CTXRover said:How do you know that?That is why I said above to be cognizant of what is actually being included when someone says a ride costs this or that. At the very least, the money spent to grade the land would be included in the price tag of the ride...as would probably the cost of building the queue buildings and probably the walkways to get there.
animal_king1990 said:So if the money spent to grade the land would be included in the price tag of the ride, people should not say E.E costs $75 million, they should just go with $100 million period since it's included in the price and that is part of the ride also right? That would mean $100 million is the "offcial" price for E.E
Thrawn said:I can't see ToT costing $75m, because freefall rides don't cost that much. I could see $50m, but thats being generous and giving about $20-25m to theming.
Thrawn said:Site is incorrect.
http://www.frommers.com/destinations/waltdisneyworld/A24438.html
$60m. Site also quotes HPs donation of the M:S cost at $100m.
I'll get you confirming sources if you'd like.
Thrawn said:Mission:Space was about $220 million in disclosed costs
Tower is actually one of the most expensive attractions Disney's ever done. And it has NOTHING to do with the ride system. Think Lobby. Most of the pieces in there are genuine antiques dating back centuries. Only a few of those pieces are replicas and items made for Tower (and I'm talking like 5 pieces)Thrawn said:I don't think ToT was that expensive. Freefall rides aren't.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.