Pumbas Nakasak
Heading for the great escape.
Ultimately its all hippy ________.
You hit the nail on the head. Gotta give Disney credit for Mission: Space though.No, actually they designed the Three Broomsticks first for the Wizarding World, and then used THAT design to build it for the movie. Also, a movie is an outside set, where the actors walk into a facade for a building, and inside is nothing. Then they cut and walk out and into a another soundstage where a mock up of the what inside would look like is built. In Wizarding World, it all has to be together. Ugh, nevermind. No matter what I say, some people will just be so hard headed, sneering their nose going "nope, nope, nope," not appreciating the thousands of man hours and years of programming that goes into making a high tech ride like FJ. You guys go enjoy your omni-mover that has been done for years, while Universal whips up yet ANOTHER technologically advanced ride.
Gotta give Disney credit for Mission: Space though.
Except that was one of Disney's worst failures yet. That attraction is simply awful and a complete waste of millions of dollars. They should have stuck with Horizons.
It's one of my favorites. It's that realistic launch sensation.Except that was one of Disney's worst failures yet. That attraction is simply awful and a complete waste of millions of dollars. They should have stuck with Horizons.
I love how your opinion is the Gospel truth and everyone else is just objectively wrong. This thread has been sufficiently destroyed.
It has nothing to do with when the FIRST book came out. They're STILL releasing new material. If they released the entire series and every film fifteen years ago and it was still popular, then we'd talk.
Except that was one of Disney's worst failures yet. That attraction is simply awful and a complete waste of millions of dollars. They should have stuck with Horizons.
On what basis can you objectively state with such certainty that Mission: Space is a failure? It seems popular every time I go to WDW.Everest or Mission Space. You have to give Everest credit. The switchtrackes on Everest are very impressive. The whole ride is really incredible. Mission:space, as much of a flop this is, you have to give it credit for reaching into new HORIZONS and creating a centrifuge. These are both 100 million dollar rides greenlit by Eisner and I respect Eisner for taking a chance on Mission:Space. All and all These two rides are incredibly engineered feats of technology.
Respectfully, I don't think this is a solid argument. They wouldn't still be releasing material if the franchise weren't still popular with audiences.
As a counter-example, James Bond has been releasing films for half a century, with the most recent coming out in 2008 and another scheduled for next year. I doubt many people would say that character has yet to prove his staying power because new material is still being released featuring him, instead of acknowledging the stream of new material over time as evidence of the franchise's lasting popularity.
And I know I'm a bit late on this, but as much as I love Tolkien, it's not like he invented all his concepts from whole cloth. Just to use one example, Gandalf is clearly an example of the senex archetype described by Carl Jung, a Tolkien contemporary who was lecturing and writing decades before Lord of the Rings was written.
Maybe not a failure, but not the clonable smash hit Eisner wished for.On what basis can you objectively state with such certainty that Mission: Space is a failure? It seems popular every time I go to WDW.
Maybe not a failure, but not the clonable smash hit Eisner wished for.
That in itself is a sign the attraction isn`t as popular as planned. Limiting the original version to half the bays surely shows the demand isn`t there, otherwise the Orange line would be all the way to the parking lot. A mis judgement? Certainly an expensive mistake, with 2 centrifuges not doing what they were paid to do.Personally, it's gone up in my opinion since they've added the pick your own intensity option. That's a nice touch.
Except that was one of Disney's worst failures yet. That attraction is simply awful and a complete waste of millions of dollars. They should have stuck with Horizons.
Ane there in lies the problem. Todays guests can expect too many thrills. If it ain`t a rush it can be deemed no good.didn't come close to the thrills you can get from Mission:Space.
Ane there in lies the problem. Todays guests can expect too many thrills. If it ain`t a rush it can be deemed no good.
Horizons was `very similar to SSE` purely since it was an Omimover. To use that anaology must mean so was The Haunted Mansion.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.