Reading the posts on the 5th page, I completely forgot what thread I was in....you're right.....talk about thread drift!Gee, I didn't know I was reading the thread about Fastpass+, I thought this was about the broken tree....
A billion and a half dollars on tech junk that will be old news in a few years.I understand what NextGen is. Unfortunately, it's not near as interesting or as much fun as ground-breaking, mind-melting attractions. I'd plan a trip to see something amazing. Not planning a trip to go see how Disney applied technology to the flow of my trip. That's the point. It's a whole lot of money that could've been better spent. That's my opinion, tho. That's coming from a person who really doesn't care about tech junk or characters knowing my name.
BTW, why can't Disney do a trip app that allows you to pay for stuff via smart phone like Starbucks has? Maybe Disney should take notes. I don't have to wear or carry a bracelet to Starbucks.
A billion and a half dollars on tech junk that will be old news in a few years.
A billion and and a half!
On Nextgen. Stuff nobody needs and most people don't care about. A billion and a half.
Of course the money could have been better spent. They have lost their minds.
The same thing was said about Walt and Roy when they built Disneyland.Of course the money could have been better spent. They have lost their minds.
You must be smarter than them.A billion and a half dollars on tech junk that will be old news in a few years.
A billion and and a half!
On Nextgen. Stuff nobody needs and most people don't care about. A billion and a half.
Of course the money could have been better spent. They have lost their minds.
If that happens I will come here, stand on my soap box, and sing "I Was Wrong". Start holding your breath. LOL!What most people don't know is that there's a phase 2 to NextGen which is why it cost a billion dollars. In addition to skipping the turnstiles, guests who wear a bracelet get to board a hydrofoil at the TTC.
The shocking appalling part is allowing show to suffer to try to get ahead (or shouldn't we be saying "catch up") on your technology. Or, not planning ahead better from the get-go so things don't get stale while you spend a billion or so doing "infrastructure" stuff. Meanwhile, the competition up the road is really slammin the home runs... It's okay to knock the Mouse sometimes. A little ribbing never hurt anyone.Next Gen isn't SUPPOSED to blow your mind. It's infrastructure. A platform. It's like roads or computers or accounting software. That's the problem. People are evaluating it like it's a billion dollar attraction. It's NOT an attraction. It's a thousand tiny improvements that will be implemented over time, some that will enhance the guest experience, some that will create operational efficiencies, and yes, some that will assist marketing efforts. I know it's shocking and appalling that a company spend money on such things, but it's all part of 21st century business.
So true. Goes along the lines of a press event to announce additional show seating. Fun stuff!I think the problem people are having with Next/Gen is that Disney themselves is making a big issue about it. If they had just slipped the upgrades in, without making all the fuss, there wouldn't be the discussion that's been going on.
LOL! I was pokin' fun...then it just sorta happened. Not my intent. I do sincerely apologize.I just realized that I'm in the "More Tree Issues" thread.....how did this thread drift into Next/Gen?
That's the biggest myth on all these boards. Universal is growing but that's because they were insolvent, i.e. almost bankrupt before Harry Potter. If I open a park and five people come, then the next year ten people come, I can claim I grew by 100%. With your logic, I'm slammin the home runs. Universal went from "failing" to doing "pretty well." Disney has consistently been doing "very well" but they get slammed for little growth. Universal isn't changing and building because they're killing it, they're changing and building because they're desperate and gasping for air.The shocking appalling part is allowing show to suffer to try to get ahead (or shouldn't we be saying "catch up") on your technology. Or, not planning ahead better from the get-go so things don't get stale while you spend a billion or so doing "infrastructure" stuff. Meanwhile, the competition up the road is really slammin the home runs... It's okay to knock the Mouse sometimes. A little ribbing never hurt anyone.
Wait until Uni's attendance surpasses DHS or AK's and then you'll change your opinion on Uni's progress. Universal is doing very well right now, no need to diminish their accomplishments.That's the biggest myth on all these boards. Universal is growing but that's because they were insolvent, i.e. almost bankrupt before Harry Potter. If I open a park and five people come, then the next year ten people come, I can claim I grew by 100%. With your logic, I'm slammin the home runs. Universal went from "failing" to doing "pretty well." Disney has consistently been doing "very well" but they get slammed for little growth. Universal isn't changing and building because they're killing it, they're changing and building because they're desperate and gasping for air.
I don't care one bit about attendance. I care about Net Operating Income. Universal has inflated "click" totals because they have a disproportionate number of passholders who are very low-revenue guests. DLR has the same problem.Wait until Uni's attendance surpasses DHS or AK's and then you'll change your opinion on Uni's progress. Universal is doing very well right now, no need to diminish their accomplishments.
I don't really care about attendance, income or any of it. I just like a clean, pretty park with good rides. IMO, Uni does a better job there.I don't care one bit about attendance. I care about Net Operating Income. Universal has inflated "click" totals because they have a disproportionate number of passholders who are very low-revenue guests. DLR has the same problem.
Edit: It'll never happen anyway. Worl of Disney has higher attendance than Universal Studios.
They JUST spent $2 billion on cruise ships. In ADDITION to Next Gen. You act like the NGE budget is the only money being spent by Parks and Resorts. Or ever again. Avatar is coming and it WON'T be just one ride, nor a Soarin' clone.I don't really care about attendance, income or any of it. I just like a clean, pretty park with good rides. IMO, Uni does a better job there.
I wish Disney had spent their billion and a half dollars on that.
NextGen trees... where the limbs decide, on their own, to break off thus lodging themselves into the heads of the guests! Now THAT is Disney theme park magic (and interactive!)I just realized that I'm in the "More Tree Issues" thread.....how did this thread drift into Next/Gen?
Do they grow their own nets?NextGen trees... where the limbs decide, on their own, to break off thus lodging themselves into the heads of the guests! Now THAT is Disney theme park magic (and interactive!)
Yes, only for illusion of safety... But, when the tree decides to really get interactive, they retract the nets...Do they from their own nets?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.