More park hour cuts

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
I just give up. If you folks are willing to pay more, and expect less It will be the downfall of what WDW was intended to be. Once you start lowering standards you enter the norm of everyday run of the mill entertainment. I hope those of you willing to accept less enjoy the WDW that you will eventually end up with.

sad ... ain't it?

And it has seeped into the pores of so many people. It's not just Disney. You might have missed when American was WalMarted.

Like I've said ad nauseum, if people have been conditioned for over a decade to consistently accept lower quality at higher prices while believing they are getting the Disney magic, things are only going to get worse.

Doncha realize that WDW has always been the way it is now?:hammer:
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
sad ... ain't it?

And it has seeped into the pores of so many people. It's not just Disney. You might have missed when American was WalMarted.

Like I've said ad nauseum, if people have been conditioned for over a decade to consistently accept lower quality at higher prices while believing they are getting the Disney magic, things are only going to get worse.

Doncha realize that WDW has always been the way it is now?:hammer:

We are finely gettin a Walmart. Are you sayin that there is good or whut
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
I truly believe they ended up wanting the clubs to fail. Just a change in what Disney wants from DTD and it started with the success of the reimagined "Marketplace" and I believe will successfully be implemented in the old DTD area. Of course I know that is not the majority opinion here but we will see.

I believe you meant the old PI area, right?

But you are quite correct. Disney did want the clubs to fail. Too bad that they really didn't ... BET and Motion were the only two that 'might' have been losing money by the time this fall came around.

I am not really looking forward to what comes next, not that I liked the living corpse that's been PI for years now.

DD has just become a loud crowded Disney mall ... and now it's going to expand.

Ah well, at least folks will have somewhere to go when 8 or 9 comes around and all the parks are closed.
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
I believe you meant the old PI area, right?

But you are quite correct. Disney did want the clubs to fail. Too bad that they really didn't ... BET and Motion were the only two that 'might' have been losing money by the time this fall came around.

I am not really looking forward to what comes next, not that I liked the living corpse that's been PI for years now.

DD has just become a loud crowded Disney mall ... and now it's going to expand.

Ah well, at least folks will have somewhere to go when 8 or 9 comes around and all the parks are closed.

Yep, bowling, hot air balloon rides and eating with the dinosaurs. :)
 

Enderikari

Well-Known Member
Well, let me jump in with some of my input here. The first statement that needs to be made is that theme park hours are always based on expected attendance. Seems like a simple enough statement, right? Think of the implication... A guest at a Walt Disney World theme park should be able to visit an equal number of attractions whether the park close at midnight or if the park at 8. In my experience (which believe me I would believe equal to or surpassing even the surliest here) this has been the case. I know better than to visit the MK on a day where it closes at 1 am. Simply put, there's more people than China.
So, stretching this out to it's logical conclusion (get your cameras ready, for this will be the only time I ever say this) WDW1974 is right. Oh, for sure he's not right about the parks being open less than they were in the 70s and 80s... He's either willfully ignoring the times of the year when fireworks only ran twice a week at the MK and if you wanted to stay past 6 pm on a weekday, too bad; or he is blissfully unaware that that used to be the case. And he's not right about WDW being the bastion of shortened hours while all other theme parks are upholding some sort of gold standard. I got two words for you, Disneyland; September. Try it sometime.
No, what he is right about is how bad WDW is expecting it to be next year... Personally, I think they are over-reacting(as the Disney Company is wont to do), but to reduce the hours as much as they have (which, barring the Epcot change is actually not a significant dip in hours, which has been both proven and ignored earlier in this thread), is the Disney Company's way of saying "you're right WDW1974, we are going to have less people, so you can reap the benefits of a basically empty park in a much shorter time, enjoy not having to tear your hair out while being surrounded by tourists and have a Disney Day!"
Truth is, times are going to be tough next year, and many people are not going to be able to make a trip out to WDW. That works out to the benefit of the locals who can make an easy trip out with their annual pass, but I unfortunately, that isn't as large a number of people as is necessary to keep the parks open til midnight... On a Tuesday...in January...
You benefit from decreased attendance, not suffer from it... Sure the parks may be only open until 8 or 9, but think of what you can accomplish in the 12 hours the park is open. Or compare it to the closing times of the other area theme parks, which almost Universally (pun intended) close 3 hours prior to any time the MK could close.
And, as a special note to Ghostbuster626... Some day, when you are older, you'll learn to take responsibility for your decisions. The fact that YOU prefer to sleep in, and visit the parks later on in the day is fantastic, but is not the Disney Companies responsibility to cater to. How selfish do you have to be to say, "well, they are open for 11 - 12 hours a day, but I want them to be open when it's most convenient to me!"? You want to sleep in late, and get to the park as night is falling? By all means, whatever floats your boat, but don't sink mine because I like to get up early.

Now, please excuse any typos, due to the fact that this entire post was typed out letter for letter on my Ipod touch, which is not the ideal medium for such a treatise
 
I just give up. If you folks are willing to pay more, and expect less It will be the downfall of what WDW was intended to be. Once you start lowering standards you enter the norm of everyday run of the mill entertainment. I hope those of you willing to accept less enjoy the WDW that you will eventually end up with.
Yes, I'm completly in favor of mediocrity because I don't think that Disney should stay open two hours later in the off season simply because it would suit me best. My standards are incredibly low because I don't think it makes sense to have the parks operating at full capacity simply because I would like to stay at MK until well past midnight in the middle of February. Obviously it would make more business sense for Disney to take every individuals sleep schedule into account before deciding on park hours.
 

fosse76

Well-Known Member
It's called the off-season for a reason. Use the cash you save on hotels by not going during peak season (sometimes EXTREMELY large) and tack sometime onto the stay if you need to. What you are describing is what the off-season is for.

I think you misunderstood me. I am not concerned with operating hours. Generally, hours are shortened because of less people. When there are less people you can do more in less time. Therefore the value of money spent is equal (more or less).

The issue is that the pricing during the off-season versus quantity of entertainment is not equal. The price increases for the year (most of which are unsubstantiated) always occur during the off-season. So you always pay more for less. And what I mean is this is the time of year where rides are refurbished, show schedules are reduced, fireworks slashed, etc. Logically it makes sense for the Company. However, they shouldn't be charging MORE for people to experience less. Reduced hotel rates mean nothing. It's the price of the theme park ticket that really matters. Yes I think it's appropriate that they use the off-season for repairs, refurbishments, etc. But you can't charge people more for it. I shouldn't pay $80 to get into the Animal Kingdom only to find half the attractions are closed. They want to do repairs, then fine, but they should adjust the admission.

I've said it before, I'm for closing an entire park down one day a week if it saves money during the off-season. If you want guarantees that most things will be open with late park hours, go during peak season.

I have no problem with that either. However, I think Animal Kingdom is the only park that they could get away with closing one day a week, public-relations-wise.

This isn't really that different from the way things have been in the past, and many are really blowing this one out of proportion.

I agree. Shortening the hours by one hour one day per week isn't the end of the world. I'm wondering if it had more to do with overtime issues. While financially I can't imagine that one hour one day per week has much impact, it does if many of the employees were on overtime at the time. What's an hour anyway, the other parks close around that time as well.

As for the Animal Kingdom's "for the animals" being considered as merely an excuse...keep in mind that the Animal Kingdom has the least number of attractions for guests, and animals are not reliable to cooperate as theme park attractions. I don't know of any zoo that is open at night, so there is NO reason to believe that that early closing IS NOT, in fact, in the best interest of the animals. The park was open late for the first few years of its being opened? Is it not possible that the powers-that-be were finally convinced that it WAS in the animals' best interest to close early? So if any park should be closed one day per week, this is their best option. Expedition Everest isn't popular enough to have people complain that the park is closed.
 

DisneyMusician2

Well-Known Member
^^^Fair enough :)

I just think that the discounts you are referring to are present in the lodging rates rather than the ticket prices. Ticket prices are static for now, and not subject to season or else we might really get gouged as we do for different weekend and holiday prices for this stuff.

Do you stay on site, or off-site when you travel?
 

disnyfan89

Well-Known Member
I shouldn't pay $80 to get into the Animal Kingdom only to find half the attractions are closed. They want to do repairs, then fine, but they should adjust the admission.

I agree with most of what you said however, that same $80 ticket that can get you into Animal Kingdom could be used instead at DHS or Epcot or MK. It was your choice to use that ticket instead for a park that may not be operating fully that day.
 

DisneyMusician2

Well-Known Member
I agree with most of what you said however, that same $80 ticket that can get you into Animal Kingdom could be used instead at DHS or Epcot or MK. It was your choice to use that ticket instead for a park that may not be operating fully that day.

Maybe they could offer a free hopper in the off-season. That would technically defer costs and account for some rides and attractions being closed by offering the other parks as an incentive.

I know they occasionally offer free add-on options in the off-season, but I would make it a policy.
 

disnyfan89

Well-Known Member
Maybe they could offer a free hopper in the off-season. That would technically defer costs and account for some rides and attractions being closed by offering the other parks as an incentive.

I know they occasionally offer free add-on options in the off-season, but I would make it a policy.
Perhaps.
 

fosse76

Well-Known Member
^^^Fair enough :)

I just think that the discounts you are referring to are present in the lodging rates rather than the ticket prices. Ticket prices are static for now, and not subject to season or else we might really get gouged as we do for different weekend and holiday prices for this stuff.

I'm sure they are. Their ticket pricing scale as it currently exists gives you more "bang for your buck" the longer you stay, so it "seems" more logical to offer the discounts on lodging. The problem with that is not everyone who visits Disney stays on property, nor do they stay more than a week. But I agree...they already gouge guests with their ticket prices as they are, if they changed seasonally summer visitors would probably pay twice as much.

Do you stay on site, or off-site when you travel?

The three times I went this year I stayed at the Pop Century...mainly for ease of use of the transportation system. If I stayed off-site and didn't want to rent a car, then I'd have to adhere to the hotel's shuttle times, whereas at Disney it's pretty much every 20 minutes. I'd even buy an annual pass, the problem is then I know I'd have to visit for at least 11 days total for the year, but most of my trips are impromptu. :)

DisneyMusician2 said:
Maybe they could offer a free hopper in the off-season. That would technically defer costs and account for some rides and attractions being closed by offering the other parks as an incentive.

I know they occasionally offer free add-on options in the off-season, but I would make it a policy.

They should do that...perhaps as a choice for free dining: change to the quick service plan and get a park hopper for free. If anything, I think they should reduce the park hopper. it's about 60% of a full day ticket...it should at most be only 50%. Disney gets your money no matter which park you visit.

disnyfan89 said:
I agree with most of what you said however, that same $80 ticket that can get you into Animal Kingdom could be used instead at DHS or Epcot or MK. It was your choice to use that ticket instead for a park that may not be operating fully that day.

That's not really a justification for them. Yes it was my choice to go there, but if they still plan on charging $80 I should have AT LEAST the equivalent amount of entertainment choice as a guest in July does.
 

CBOMB

Active Member
Yes, I'm completly in favor of mediocrity because I don't think that Disney should stay open two hours later in the off season simply because it would suit me best. My standards are incredibly low because I don't think it makes sense to have the parks operating at full capacity simply because I would like to stay at MK until well past midnight in the middle of February. Obviously it would make more business sense for Disney to take every individuals sleep schedule into account before deciding on park hours.
I never said you were in favor of mediocrity, however that may just be what you end up with.It is not off-season, it's value season. The reason they offer reduced prices is because they are trying to entice more people to the Parks that time of the year. You really seem content with hearing what you want to hear. I never asked for the parks to be adjusted to my sleep schedule, nor did I ask for the park hours to be extended. Why do you have such a difficult time grasping the concept of I'm only asking for what I have been getting for at least the last 12 years, only now I pay more for it. I'm sure you are willing to accept all the other cuts that have taken place, and any additional cuts coming up. That's your business, you are entitled to your opinion. I on the other hand don't think it's such a wise decision to readily take such cuts. That's my opinion, and I'm certain you would agree I'm entitled to it. Just remember this, when things like this happen they sometimes become what everybody starts considering as the norm.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Well, let me jump in with some of my input here. The first statement that needs to be made is that theme park hours are always based on expected attendance. Seems like a simple enough statement, right?

Uhm ... not exactly.

At least not anymore. The biggest factor in determining WDW park operating hours now is the load levels at WDW resorts. The only problem with that is that many people (yes, even with 30,000 rooms and timeshares on property) still come from off-site locations. So when you look at say ... January and see a terrible number for predicted occupancy (see new thread) the parks could still be very busy with off-site and local guests.

Think of the implication... A guest at a Walt Disney World theme park should be able to visit an equal number of attractions whether the park close at midnight or if the park at 8. In my experience (which believe me I would believe equal to or surpassing even the surliest here) this has been the case. I know better than to visit the MK on a day where it closes at 1 am. Simply put, there's more people than China.

No. Not necessarily true. If the MK is open from 8-midnight, it will be crowded (packed likely at times) but those throngs will ebb and flow as people leave for a meal, a swim, to park hop or just take off for the day. When MK is open say 9-7, you can pretty much expect crowds to be consistent for much more of the day.

So, stretching this out to it's logical conclusion (get your cameras ready, for this will be the only time I ever say this) WDW1974 is right.

Why is the this only time you'll agree with me?

Do you enjoy being wrong?

Oh, for sure he's not right about the parks being open less than they were in the 70s and 80s...

No, pal, I am quite right about them being open less now ... do I have to go and pull an operating schedule from say August of 1977 that shows the MK was open 9-1 every day except the last two days when it was 9-7? Do I have to pull an EPCOT schedule from the summer of 1988 that shows the ENTIRE park open from 8-midnight over the summer? What about a DAK schedule from 1998 that shows 7-8 operating hours daily?

I don't state things as facts unless they are in fact so ...

He's either willfully ignoring the times of the year when fireworks only ran twice a week at the MK and if you wanted to stay past 6 pm on a weekday, too bad; or he is blissfully unaware that that used to be the case.

No, he isn't at all. He has mentioned this on other threads here in the past week. Nightly MK fireworks didn't become 'normal' until fall of 1996 when WDW started doing so for the woefully short of substance 25th anniversary ... it was a gimmick to do them nightly, but proved popular so they stuck with doing so.

But there's a whole lot more to a MK visit than fireworks. I recall times when MK was open until 10 or 11 and didn't have any ... fireworks used to be special, offered nightly during summer, Spring Break and Christmas and occassionaly holiday weekends.

I grew up with days of MK closing at 6 every night ... like it did in October 1981 for example (since I have that operating calendar here). No one died. No one even complained because Disney gave you a lot of bang for your buck when it was open.

And he's not right about WDW being the bastion of shortened hours while all other theme parks are upholding some sort of gold standard. I got two words for you, Disneyland; September. Try it sometime.

Hey, buddy, guess what? WDW1974 has been an APer at DL since the 1990s to go with his 1982 original WDW AP and his DLP AP.

He's been to DL countless times, including this past September. And he has no issue with DL's off-season 10-8 hours since the place is very uncrowded that time of year ... except on weekends when it is packed and remains open until 11 or midnight.

WDW is, as you put it, the bastion of shortened hours based upon WHAT IT USED TO OFFER ALL GUESTS!

No, what he is right about is how bad WDW is expecting it to be next year... Personally, I think they are over-reacting(as the Disney Company is wont to do), but to reduce the hours as much as they have (which, barring the Epcot change is actually not a significant dip in hours, which has been both proven and ignored earlier in this thread), is the Disney Company's way of saying "you're right WDW1974, we are going to have less people, so you can reap the benefits of a basically empty park in a much shorter time, enjoy not having to tear your hair out while being surrounded by tourists and have a Disney Day!"

NOTHING here has been proven about cuts in hours except people saying they aren't being cut and the rest of us, who have the facts on our side, are saying uhm, yeah they are.

And again, you are missing the point here. I have NO issue with Disney cutting back the hours in 2009 if attendance plummets like they predict. That is smart business and very wise in tough times.

My issue is them making all of these premptive cuts in 2008 (like closing the park at 8 on a holiday weekend when they are kicking off their Light Spectacular) to save money in advance. Because the parks appear to have been packed last week and Disney's cuts resulted in a lower quality product for all those folks spending thousands on magical WDW vacations.

That's my issue.

If no one show up in January, I'd advocate having one park shuttered every day and I'd fight any fanboy who disagrees out on the McPoohPlayground!

Do you get my POV yet?

Truth is, times are going to be tough next year, and many people are not going to be able to make a trip out to WDW. That works out to the benefit of the locals who can make an easy trip out with their annual pass, but I unfortunately, that isn't as large a number of people as is necessary to keep the parks open til midnight... On a Tuesday...in January...

And what sane, rational person would ever advocate the parks being left open until midnight on a Tuesday in January (except perhaps the first one of the month)?
 
I never said you were in favor of mediocrity, however that may just be what you end up with.It is not off-season, it's value season. The reason they offer reduced prices is because they are trying to entice more people to the Parks that time of the year. You really seem content with hearing what you want to hear. I never asked for the parks to be adjusted to my sleep schedule, nor did I ask for the park hours to be extended. Why do you have such a difficult time grasping the concept of I'm only asking for what I have been getting for at least the last 12 years, only now I pay more for it. I'm sure you are willing to accept all the other cuts that have taken place, and any additional cuts coming up. That's your business, you are entitled to your opinion. I on the other hand don't think it's such a wise decision to readily take such cuts. That's my opinion, and I'm certain you would agree I'm entitled to it. Just remember this, when things like this happen they sometimes become what everybody starts considering as the norm.

I'm not happy with a lot of cuts Disney has made, I'm not happy about the downfall of cleanliness in the parks, the length of time between refurbishments, the quality of CM's (and this is coming from a CM), Entertainment cut backs, etc. I just see making a cutback in something like hours is a better way to prevent cutbacks in things I see as being a higher priority. And I think things change over the years and it isn't always possible to recieve the same thing year after year. Vacationing trends change, economic trends change, what the public wants changes. Maybe 12 years ago more people visited in value season and now not as many do and the demand for longer park hours just isn't there. There are more factors to it than medicority.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
The trending downward of park hours in the past decade (actually even longer) has NOTHING to do with people suddenly all becoming old fart who want to be in bed at 10 p.m. ... it has nothing to do with people visiting at different periods ... it really has been a deliberate management deal ... think of how many people now start their day with a magical foamhead breakfast (nothing like wattery scrambled eggs, fatty bacon and fruit for $19.99 a person) ... this is all part and parcel of Disney trying to make its parks morning and afternoon destinations.

People like to stay out late when they're on vacation ... even if they have kids. Disney has just conditioned guests to consider a 9 or 10 p.m. closing as late.

It isn't.

It's just WalMarting. Less quality. More money.
 

epcotWSC

Well-Known Member
I'm not happy with a lot of cuts Disney has made, I'm not happy about the downfall of cleanliness in the parks, the length of time between refurbishments, the quality of CM's (and this is coming from a CM), Entertainment cut backs, etc. I just see making a cutback in something like hours is a better way to prevent cutbacks in things I see as being a higher priority. And I think things change over the years and it isn't always possible to recieve the same thing year after year. Vacationing trends change, economic trends change, what the public wants changes. Maybe 12 years ago more people visited in value season and now not as many do and the demand for longer park hours just isn't there. There are more factors to it than medicority.

That's all management. I personally don't really notice it much as a younger person. However, I can still see some problems. Disney should be going above and beyond my expectations, not meeting them. I love my Disney experience, but that's more because I just love being in Disney, being there with my girlfriend, just having a good time and acting like a kid.

Cleanliness: Well Disney is supposed to be cleaner than most places, but well it's about the same as most place, so I can see the beef here.

Refurbs: As someone who hadn't gone to Disney many times before recently, I never really noticed that until I came onto this forum. However, just by reading what management is doing with their existing rides and also with the possibilities of new rides, it is pretty sad.

CMs: I find that most CMs tend to be good. Although there are a fair share of aholes too. I remember asking one a question this past year near the gate and they gave me a nasty look and answered me in a nasty way like I shouldn't be bothering them. Thanks buddy. However, for every one like that, there are also lots of great CMs.

Unfortunately cuts will come when times are rough. However, I also don't see management having a plan to move themselves forward from this mess either. It feels like they're just banking on the Walt Disney World name instead of giving people a reason to go there on a regular basis.

I'd like to see some refurbs, keep things looking not just good, but amazing. Make new rides, but keep the charm of Disney and kept Walt Disney's original ideas alive. The problem is that back when Walt ran the company and when DL first opened, the guy would play in his park before it opened. He was a kid at heart! None of these execs now are like that. All they see is dollar signs. They've inherited the name, the brand, the park. They don't' need to take risks to get people to come, and because of that they won't until they get burned.

Why build something new when people are still coming in record numbers? Why keep the parks cleaner than they have to be when attendance is growing? Why hire better people than necessary when people's wallets aren't complaining?

See the thing is, unless WDW becomes a complete mess (which it is far from), then people probably won't stop going and management won't really change.

The fact is, no matter how much some people dislike what management is doing, those same people still love going to WDW. They still love Disney and everything associated with it. They love going to WDW and being a kid and making new memories. Who doesn't? Unfortunately, at the same time, our concerns as loyal customers go unheard.
 

Lucky

Well-Known Member
It's just too bad they don't have you on the board to tell them, right? It's not possible that they may have the resources to think of the solutions you've come up with to cut back without cutting the workforce or entertainment value... Oh well, guess you have to go back to running your own fortune 100 Company... I hope your company is doing better these days!

:lookaroun

Mean? Hopefully not, certainly not meant to be. Meant to remind you that the company has resources far beyond one or two guys sitting in a board room planning their next golf outing.
Oh yeah, corporate executives never make mistakes. They're way too smart for that. A lot of them even have MBAs.
 

hokielutz

Well-Known Member
When companies cut back they very, very rarely (i.e. almost never) reverse field when things get better. When's the last time you got a hot meal (or any meal) when flying in coach on a US carrier domestically? Oh yeah, you're just worried about paying for your bags to fly too these days! WDW operates the same way. Very few things they cut will ever get restored once things improve...

United Airlines about a month ago, recinded their second bag fee of $50. Does that count?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom