Casper Gutman
Well-Known Member
But several of the mediums I listed used to be marked by the exact same impermanence. Film degraded over time and TV and comics were deemed inherently disposable. Many early episodes of Dr Who and other BBC programs are lost forever because the company erased them to reuse the film and save money - a fairly apt comparison to ride replacement. Theater productions are inherently impermanent because people age, but just like films and paintings theme park attractions, if preserved and maintained, have far greater longevity.I don't personally feel that this is the same thing as film, TV, comics, or video games because by nature, theme park rides are not permanent. Long lasting, sure, but not permanent. They're not going to last forever in the same way that a film can live on, or a TV show can live on, or an album can live on. I absolutely believe they're art, but I also cannot pretend they don't have an expiration date.
What is unique about this medium is that when one piece of art reaches the end of it's lifespan, it can be replaced by a new piece of art. The debate that gets waged here is whether or not that new art is of the same caliber as the old art, and that is where I say there is no right or wrong answer to that question. Someone isn't wrong for liking a new ride just as someone isn't wrong for preferring what was there before.
We can argue all day about it, but that's just the simple fact of it all. No one side is objectively correct because there is no such thing as objectivity when it comes to what people enjoy. It is purely subjective in every possible way. There is nothing on this planet that everyone universally derives joy from.
MuppetVision's film is being preserved. That is the piece of this particular artwork that has no expiration and will live on well beyond the building it was shown in. The attraction itself though from the moment it opened had the same ticking clock that every theme park ride does because they simply cannot and will not last forever. I know you will disagree with me on that.
But I truly look at theme park rides like a theater production. From the moment that production opens, it's a ticking clock to when it closes. Yes, someone somewhere else can stage another version of that show, but it's not the same. It's a different version. That one show will only last as long as its run, and when that run ends, that particular show is gone for good. What other version comes after may not be as good as the one that came before it. What entirely new show moves into the theater once that show finishes its run may be better than the show that was there before. That's just how it goes. These things just don't last forever.
And yes, everyone’s option of a work of art is valid FOR THAT PERSON, but we don’t judge each opinion to necessarily be an equally meaningful judgement of the piece of art. We would be very skeptical of someone who judged Fast and Furious: Tokyo Drift a better film then Citizen Kane - we would not take that as a significant appraisal of the quality of the two films. I personally enjoy Rocketeer much more than Rules of the Game, but I’m not going to offer that as a serious critique of the two films. Expertise in the history of an art form, its aesthetic development, its broader cultural meaning - those DO matter in artistic analysis.