AidenRodriguez731
Active Member
You spend the money to:If that is the thought - there should be plenty of room in the current Animation footprint + other backstage for more than one property though - then what they should do is build the larger property on current backstage space first. They are doing it backwards if they are replacing onstage things first with a "phase two" down the road (we all know how often phase two plans ever actually happen with Disney)
Build the thing that the park needs now - a real expansion - and worry about tinkering with replacements later.
So spend a crapload of money to basically have a lateral move in park capacity? Sounds like a terrible idea and waste of resources. DHS is desperate for more attraction capacity.
Have better thematic consistency of attractions to more accurately articulate the studios themes of the park into an immersive world kinda angle.
Remove a possibly problematic attraction that has been showing its age for a while
Remove an underperforming attraction and serve as a connection point to better loop the park
Add in 3-4 new attractions (Monsters Inc Laugh Floor + Monsters Door Coaster)
(2 rides for Zootopia) (Could even be another land for another ride or two if you use all backstage as you said)
Retheme one of Disneys weakest restaraunts into a bold new offering that thematically ties in with a bigger franchise and serves a food type not available at this park.
Give room to possibly finally build that Muppets Great Movie Ride
If you gave the park up to me, I would probably also rip out Indiana Jones or move it somewhere better. I wouldn't want to put the amazing actors out of a job but Indiana has a much better presence than even some more deserving properties and its a giant piece of land for 1 show.