JoeCamel
Well-Known Member
And that's how you succeed in a corporate environment these days kids........My buzzword bingo card is full.
And that's how you succeed in a corporate environment these days kids........My buzzword bingo card is full.
Let’s hope people are right about it going in AC. the evacuation of the offices has to account for something.I’ve actually waited in the MV extended queue during a recent December trip, so it’s there but not usually needed.
Critically, MV enjoys excellent GSAT scores. But, it doesn’t book Lightning Lanes and that is unfortunately a metric. I do think the response to its planned removal has been strong enough to at least make Disney take a breath. No idea what their final decision is/will be.
That can’t be as big of a deal as some are implying - otherwise Moana wouldn’t have gotten built and we wouldn’t have seen an update to Country Bears.Critically, MV enjoys excellent GSAT scores. But, it doesn’t book Lightning Lanes and that is unfortunately a metric.
It means guests are willing to wait 10 minutes to experience the attraction, currently. And willing to wait 9 times as much (90 minutes) for the Tower of Terror attraction. Tower of Terror is a shorter experience but with higher capacity per hour, so makes the 90 minute vs. 10 minute difference even more significant (people willing to wait longer on a ride that moved through people quicker and is ultimately a shorter-lived experience)It's a continuously-playing theatre show. That's typically how the waits for those work, so I'm not entirely sure what you think this proves. The "wait" would just be the amount of time until the next show.
There's no queue of people loading into a vehicle, just a lobby of people waiting for a set time. I can't imagine how this concept isn't obvious.
That can’t be as big of a deal as some are implying - otherwise Moana wouldn’t have gotten built and we wouldn’t have seen an update to Country Bears.
Critically, MV enjoys excellent GSAT scores. But, it doesn’t book Lightning Lanes and that is unfortunately a metric. I do think the response to its planned removal has been strong enough to at least make Disney take a breath. No idea what their final decision is/will be.
Just to be clear, Roger rabbit is one of my favorite movies of all time and I would kill for a new installment. But there’s no denying it’s a dead franchiseAnd you also called for the arrival of Roger rabbit to wdw
Just to be clear, Roger rabbit is one of my favorite movies of all time and I would kill for a new installment. But there’s no denying it’s a dead franchise
Hopefully we find out soon so we can finally put this to bed. @marni1971 even alluded to an announcement tomorrow.I’ve actually waited in the MV extended queue during a recent December trip, so it’s there but not usually needed.
Critically, MV enjoys excellent GSAT scores. But, it doesn’t book Lightning Lanes and that is unfortunately a metric. I do think the response to its planned removal has been strong enough to at least make Disney take a breath. No idea what their final decision is/will be.
I thought he was just being cheekyHopefully we find out soon so we can finally put this to bed. @marni1971 even alluded to an announcement tomorrow.
Costumed…cast member..as Sweetums?!? Ummmm what are you trying to imply? That, my friend, is the real deal.There's bubbles at least as a physical effect. But more importantly there are Animatronics that would need to be moved and installed and they have to have some way for a costumed cast member to come out as Sweetums. None of that seems like anything impossible to do with a new theater but I would submit that it would be a bit more costly than simply porting a show that is just the 3D film.
But my point would remain that the most cost effective thing would be to just keep MV where it is and make any additions actually additions by building in places that are underutilized or backstage or undeveloped. The Launch Bay footprint + backstage there is the most logical place for anything right now. Once that large area is filled - which should be with multiple rides along with food/merch - then you can consider "upgrading" other areas of the park by maybe replacing things. But even then I would consider replacing the IJ stunt show or the BatB show (which has an expansion pad next to it) before MV/Grand Avenue.
Personally, the only thing that should be considered to replace MV in the short term (say the next 10 years) would be if they wanted to expand Galaxy's Edge to connect to Star Tours. Anything else there are much better locations in the park for virtually anything they want to do.
I'm not sure what that says!This says it all....
Yeah, it’s possible. Either way, @wdwmagic said by the end of the month.I thought he was just being cheeky
Nah, Sweetums is employed as the cast member. He wears a costume because of basic decency (what do you think this is, Avenue Q).Costumed…cast member..as Sweetums?!? Ummmm what are you trying to imply? That, my friend, is the real deal.
Out of curiosity, what is the stance on Futurama here?The simpsons is a stretch but I can see it existing at DHS.
Family Guy and Deadpool are, in my opinion, outside of what should exist and be associated in direct connection with the Disney brand.
Can you imagine if Eisner had wanted a “kids” meet n greet at the park!?
A star tours retheme would be wonderfulOut of curiosity, what is the stance on Futurama here?
In the parks? Between Simpsons and Family Guy on my personal scale - but I’m not familiar enough to know for sure.Out of curiosity, what is the stance on Futurama here?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.