Lee
Adventurer
Is it worth it?
No. Absolutely not.
Is it worth it?
HauntedPirate said:This is undoubtedly the most civil, intelligent discussion I've ever seen on the topic of Monorail Expansion.
The problem I see is that I'm not sure there would be a recovery of funds. The monorail itself is not a profit turned, to my knowledge, and will not entice visitors to head down to the park for a trip (as, say, EE would). Now, I don't doubt it would be possible, but taken into consideration that the bus system is seemingly reliable as well as more flexible, I would venture a educated guess that any expansion of the monorail system is unlikely.I hate to join a monorail conversation, but does anyone else think it could be possible that they could use that one cheap monorail company that WDWFreak showed but only do a small expansion like to MGM, open it, wait a few years, then build the rest to AK. It would give more time to recover more money. Just some thoughts.
I think it would be more cost effective just to put up a bunch of ski lifts accross property....
That would be cool...but you'd have to find a way to keep the thug element from spitting on the people below (remember the old skyway?)
:wave:
Kevin
Connor002 said:The problem I see is that I'm not sure there would be a recovery of funds. The monorail itself is not a profit turned, to my knowledge, and will not entice visitors to head down to the park for a trip (as, say, EE would). Now, I don't doubt it would be possible, but taken into consideration that the bus system is seemingly reliable as well as more flexible, I would venture a educated guess that any expansion of the monorail system is unlikely.
The problem I see is that I'm not sure there would be a recovery of funds. The monorail itself is not a profit turned, to my knowledge, and will not entice visitors to head down to the park for a trip (as, say, EE would). Now, I don't doubt it would be possible, but taken into consideration that the bus system is seemingly reliable as well as more flexible, I would venture a educated guess that any expansion of the monorail system is unlikely.
Maybe they should make a 15 mile coaster instead of a monorail .. lol
You forgot something. It is called lightening. There are thunderstorms down here and it could get hit. Anything metal gets hit.You know, that may not be as crazy as it sounds (at least on a smaller scale). I'm guessing the distance from the entrance to MGM to the back entrance to EPCOT is about a mile or less. According to Wikipedia, the length of the track in Rock N Rollercoaster is a little over 3400 feet.
So it would be technically feasable to shoot people from MGM to EPCOT and back on a roller-coaster track. I think the biggest problems with that would be:
1. The track would be ugly.
2. The concept might just be too plain weird for most people.
But it could be done. Probably for the cost of about 3 normal sized steel roller-coasters.
Yeah, it's pretty much the same, because vegas is built on a swamp. The vegas/orlando monorail comparison has been made before in these threads, and usually hasn't come out in support of a monorail expansion.
Everyone thinks Disney has an infinite amount of money but the truth of the matter is that the theme parks operate just like any other segment in the company, they get a certain amount of money every year in the budget and that is what they are entitled to. I know if I was a Disney executive, I would rather spend my budget on new E-ticket level attractions that will keep bringing guests back to property to spend more money. The monorail system is not a revenue maker for Disney so they are less inclined to spend money on it. Disney is a business afterall and they do have shareholders and all that other stuff that they do have to watch out for.
I don't have time to argue anything else, in this post or others, but I do have this to say about the above: Absolutely False! Money is not only an issue, it is the bottom line. Profit, profit, PROFIT!Money isn't an issue.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.