Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
...so you had already had a long night of drinking?My first thought was, "looks nice, seems like a good fit."
Well done.
...so you had already had a long night of drinking?My first thought was, "looks nice, seems like a good fit."
Well done.
Grand Floridian and Disney IP:
I can't think of a Disney IP that lends itself naturally to American Seaside Resorts Circa 1900.
So what Grand Flo boils down to is "If it's Fancy it Fits."
Mary Poppins, Alice, Belle = Fancy
So they fit.
The point is to pummel you with high cost food and bev bills AND have Princess upsell space.It's not hideous, I suppose. My biggest question here is, what was the point? It's not a theme as much as it is a color palette with a smattering of rose imagery, neither of which fits the hotel. Something closer to the actual period aesthetic of the film would have fit better than what they came up with.
It just feels like a mostly lateral move.
This might win the award for dumbest justification of this bar.
So how about we don't shoehorn IP into the hotel, then?
This might win the award for dumbest justification of this bar.
The justifications for upsells are taking on weird dimensions...new records are broken every day
Snow White character dinner in WL’s Artist Point. BATB bar in GF. What’s next? Monsters, Inc in Contemporary? Or Mary Poppins in Poly?
They're building a Tiana inspired restaurant at Fort Wilderness instead of the actual New Orleans hotel.
They're not even trying anymore. Just pick a Disney movie and a Disney hotel and put them together. It's all Disney, right?
It's not even about upsells, what he said showed a total lack of understanding of not only the intent of the Grand Floridian's overall design, but what the IPs referenced in the post represent (the surrealist visuals and Victorian commentary of Alice in Wonderland are "fancy" now?) along with a strange and vague reasoning of what "fancy" is. I don't even know where to start.
That’s cheapie Chappie on the case. All things seem to be framed within a 1995 brick and mortar retail mentality...They're building a Tiana inspired restaurant at Fort Wilderness instead of the actual New Orleans hotel.
They're not even trying anymore. Just pick a Disney movie and a Disney hotel and put them together. It's all Disney, right?
Indeed...
First, it resembles the hotel del Coronado near San Diego...but the period is still accurate (opened in 1888)...that’s right down the alley of the Victorian era.
Second, it was Influenced by other hotels...including the biltmore and the breakers...so not locked into just one model. Disney did that a lot...the American adventure building is a combo of several Buildings...notably faneuil hall, Monticello, the Virginian state house and independence hall.
It’s “architecture though collaboration” and it wasn’t “broke”.
This place serves two purposes:
1. Character nonsense to beat the modern wdw traveler like a drum...indoctrination 24 hours a day.
2. Vanity...as it’s ludicrously priced to serve a new generation of new money that go to excesses with everything in the modern “me culture”
Ok...just an opinion...don’t shoot me. In out
$25 a drink
I dont usually bawk to easily at WDW prices but jeeeezzzz!
The fact it's not going to Port Orleans is a bad sign in my opinion regarding the long term future of that resort....I had long assumed that Tiana's Place would eventually come to Disney's Port Orleans - French Quarter resort, taking residence in the former Bonfamille's Cafe.
It truly is odd how irrelevant characters are selected over sensible storylines.
The fact it's not going to Port Orleans is a bad sign in my opinion regarding the long term future of that resort....
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.