Mickey and Minnie's Runaway Railway confirmed

brb1006

Well-Known Member
It is criminal that they haven't even added the cheap and simple fiber optic starfield there. I gasped when I saw them in Disneyland's Pan, they are so effective. You can add a starfield using the same exact materials to your child's bedroom for a few hundred dollars these days, I just cannot understand why they haven't done it at WDW. It's embarrassing.
Glad I wasn't the only person who thought I was going crazy when I thought it was harder to see the various characters because of the lighting.
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
Not to mention the ancient "Someone doing the crappiest impression of Captain Hook and Smee ever" voices that haven't been replaced despite having Corey Burton audio recorded for Disneyland in the 80s that could be slotted in overnight.
HELP ME MISTER SMEE HELP ME!

OH I'M COMING CAPTAIN

Considering that the audio is played on loop on that ride doesn't help. You can even hear it before you even get to that scene. Does anyone even know who voiced Hook and Smee or was it an unknown voice actor?
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
yet how many millions did they spend for that new enclosed queue addition? meanwhile no tlc for the ride itself. Def something wrong there.
What a missed opportunity to update the ride in terms of visuals and audio. You would think the new interactive queue made years ago could have gave you a hint but the actual ride is still like it was for almost 50 years.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
Is it true that there are ADA compliance issues that complicate any large scale attempts to improve the attraction?
I can’t imagine there are any issues unique to this version of Pan, and every other version has seen updates (aside from Shanghai, which is a different story).

Surely there’s room for cosmetic improvement in the ride, though I have’t fallen madly in love with the ways any of the others have been updated in the last 5 years or so. They’ve all been sort of a mixed bag to me, with Tokyo resulting in a net loss with the redesign of their Neverland room. Paris seems to have fared best, and generally they showed a lot of restraint there. Their ride needed less, though, since it opened in 1992 and was designed as a small step up from the others to begin with.

All of this is to say, I don’t think the list for updating Florida’s Pan need be very long. New audio, fiber optics, and a new coat of paint would go pretty far. Sprinkle in some projection mapping if you want, some of those have been nice. I’d even forgive them if they skimped on improving the animation of the figures if at least they refinished them all to be more on-model — check out WDW vs. DL:

WDW:
AD78EA6D-25C6-4206-BF41-D2D25F11170A.jpeg
DL:
5A361BBD-8B79-49D5-BC7E-4626B65062E0.jpeg
WDW:
C1073089-89BE-4B35-BE03-F40D4732A5FD.jpeg
DL:
736F03A9-2BA3-4B53-910B-32FB5E6D1D94.jpeg
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
rode wdw pan fairly recently and was taken aback, to be honest...
but it's hard to expect serious reno when guests continually jam-pack the current iteration.
I rode it today — had a FastPass, I’d probably never get in otherwise — a lot of the charm is baked-in. They don’t really need to change a lot, no need for excavation of scenes, just clean up some of the edges and sprinkle some pixie dust over what’s already there. Shanghai notwithstanding since it’s a more ambitious ride, Florida could pretty easily have the best version if they just build off the bones they have.

You’re totally right about the numbers it brings in, I’m sure that’s why the ride never sees real love. Hopefully one day someone will force a refurb to give it the cosmetic update it deserves. It’s a great little ride that’s just lost it’s lustre.
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
I can’t imagine there are any issues unique to this version of Pan, and every other version has seen updates (aside from Shanghai, which is a different story).

DL and WDW are the only two Peter Pan attractions that are covered by the ADA. Disneylands version of the ride functions very differently as the ships are individually dispatched and already stop for each guest.
 

aladdin2007

Well-Known Member
I rode it today — had a FastPass, I’d probably never get in otherwise — a lot of the charm is baked-in. They don’t really need to change a lot, no need for excavation of scenes, just clean up some of the edges and sprinkle some pixie dust over what’s already there. Shanghai notwithstanding since it’s a more ambitious ride, Florida could pretty easily have the best version if they just build off the bones they have.

You’re totally right about the numbers it brings in, I’m sure that’s why the ride never sees real love. Hopefully one day someone will force a refurb to give it the cosmetic update it deserves. It’s a great little ride that’s just lost it’s lustre.

I agree, despite the need for an update, its pretty much the last original charming attraction left aside from the tiki room. I would hate to see that changed. When I ride it all my magic kingdom childhood memories come flooding back.
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
I can’t imagine there are any issues unique to this version of Pan, and every other version has seen updates (aside from Shanghai, which is a different story).

Surely there’s room for cosmetic improvement in the ride, though I have’t fallen madly in love with the ways any of the others have been updated in the last 5 years or so. They’ve all been sort of a mixed bag to me, with Tokyo resulting in a net loss with the redesign of their Neverland room. Paris seems to have fared best, and generally they showed a lot of restraint there. Their ride needed less, though, since it opened in 1992 and was designed as a small step up from the others to begin with.

All of this is to say, I don’t think the list for updating Florida’s Pan need be very long. New audio, fiber optics, and a new coat of paint would go pretty far. Sprinkle in some projection mapping if you want, some of those have been nice. I’d even forgive them if they skimped on improving the animation of the figures if at least they refinished them all to be more on-model — check out WDW vs. DL:

WDW:
View attachment 254425
DL:
View attachment 254426
WDW:
View attachment 254427
DL:
View attachment 254428
And using a new soundtrack instead of the same loop of You Can Sky heard everywhere compared to Disneyland that uses music from the film.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom