Mickey and Minnie's Runaway Railway confirmed

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
No, the line out the building was visible. I even used the switchbacks the last few years I visited when it was running. Surprised even me.

More surprising was that attraction attendance was up year on year this decade. But there you go. Life’s full of little surprises isn’t it?
When did GMR get Fastpass? Wasn't it only with FP+?
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
. If you have verifiable reports of exact numbers over a years time please share them (no I'm not talking about what someone else told you, verifiable information.) Then it will have some meaning.
I just did. Well, as much as I can. If you belive me or not doesn’t bother me. Thought I wish I’d had your luck to find it half empty.
 
Last edited:

Phicinfan

Well-Known Member
No, the line out the building was visible. I even used the switchbacks the last few years I visited when it was running. Surprised even me.

More surprising was that attraction attendance was up year on year this decade. But there you go. Life’s full of little surprises isn’t it?
I have to agree here, its been a few years since I have been able to go, but in all my instances, the lines were at least out the building. Now saying that, the last two times I have gone the lines were longer because the ride was down for times due to mechanical issues. Which is why I am not surprised this ride was replaced. Can't be a people eater, if you aren't running consistently.
 

Skibum1970

Well-Known Member
I realize that it is a pipedream but it would be interesting if they opened up a ride like this without FP+ and then monitor how its line runs. While acknowledging that FP+ is their big thing, I just wonder if the lines would move so effectively that they would leave it alone. I know that this is a stupid thought but I would find it intriguing.
 

mikejs78

Premium Member
I realize that it is a pipedream but it would be interesting if they opened up a ride like this without FP+ and then monitor how its line runs. While acknowledging that FP+ is their big thing, I just wonder if the lines would move so effectively that they would leave it alone. I know that this is a stupid thought but I would find it intriguing.
For headliner E-ticket attractions, lack of FP usually results in the same or slightly shorter standby times. For lesser D/C ticket attractions, FP+ results in same or slightly longer standby times. When tiers are involved, depending on the breakdown of the tiers, the tier A attractions skew shorter and tier B attractions skew longer. This is most apparent at Epcot.

I've formed these conclusions by looking at historical average wait times across similar days on the TouringPlans website, in the year leading up to FP+ and the first year of FP+'s existence. Across all rides in a park though, wait times were pretty constant on similar days both before and after FP+.
 

Skibum1970

Well-Known Member
For headliner E-ticket attractions, lack of FP usually results in the same or slightly shorter standby times. For lesser D/C ticket attractions, FP+ results in same or slightly longer standby times. When tiers are involved, depending on the breakdown of the tiers, the tier A attractions skew shorter and tier B attractions skew longer. This is most apparent at Epcot.

I've formed these conclusions by looking at historical average wait times across similar days on the TouringPlans website, in the year leading up to FP+ and the first year of FP+'s existence. Across all rides in a park though, wait times were pretty constant on similar days both before and after FP+.

That's interesting. To me, it seemed that FP made the lines longer (except for those with a FP of course). However, while stand-by is longer, the same number of guests are being pushed through. I guess that it only feels that the lines are longer since, if you don't have a Fastpass, you are in the slower moving standby.
 

MrHappy

Well-Known Member
I believe the info shared in these forums concluded that wait times are mostly an operational decision - between staffing and cars/ride vehicles made available that day. That would effect the number of loads per day and the turn over of guests. Sure more crowded periods when park attendance is high may explain longer wait times, but there's a high degree of control Disney has in order to lessen wait times if they choose. I'm sure someone here with real knowledge of this stuff can confirm or deny.
 

DisneyFreak

Well-Known Member
They were originally in a ice show, so they could skate. Disney Dan has a good video on it


mickey.PNG
clown.PNG
 

mikejs78

Premium Member
That's interesting. To me, it seemed that FP made the lines longer (except for those with a FP of course). However, while stand-by is longer, the same number of guests are being pushed through. I guess that it only feels that the lines are longer since, if you don't have a Fastpass, you are in the slower moving standby.
I think you are right - the perception is that it's longer because the line moves slower, but the number of people in the standby line is less, so it's within the same range. If FP+ didn't exist, those same people using FP would be scattered in the standby line as well (statistically, not the actual same people necessarily).

The other thing that FP+ may do that I forgot to mention above is that it distributes guests throughout the day. So it should theoretically lower the top wait time at the peak of the attraction (midday, let's say) and redistribute the wait time a bit to less crowded parts of the day. So morning or late night might be a bit higher with FP+ in general, but the peaks would be lessend, keeping the average about the same. So that may contribute a bit too to the perception that lines are longer. But for this one I am just speculating as I don't have data to back this up (as opposed to my other post above, where there is data).
 

mikejs78

Premium Member
Only for those who are using the system.
Not necessarily. Let's say there's no FP+ and I'm a Disney novice who doesn't know when wait times are shortest, etc. I get to Space Mountain at 2 PM and get in line, along with everyone else because that's peak time.

Now with FP+ instead, I get a FP before my trip and the best I can find is a 8:30 PM return time. That takes me out of the line at 2 PM and moves me to 8:30. So that just took me out of the peak line for the day.

So my thesis is that there's a set of people who might otherwise line up at peak times end up utilizing FastPasses at lower demand times (because of availability), and that makes the peak standby lines a little shorter, but increases standby times at the other off peak times. So it flattens out the standby line a little throughout the course of the day.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
Not necessarily. Let's say there's no FP+ and I'm a Disney novice who doesn't know when wait times are shortest, etc. I get to Space Mountain at 2 PM and get in line, along with everyone else because that's peak time.

Now with FP+ instead, I get a FP before my trip and the best I can find is a 8:30 PM return time. That takes me out of the line at 2 PM and moves me to 8:30. So that just took me out of the peak line for the day.

So my thesis is that there's a set of people who might otherwise line up at peak times end up utilizing FastPasses at lower demand times (because of availability), and that makes the peak standby lines a little shorter, but increases standby times at the other off peak times. So it flattens out the standby line a little throughout the course of the day.
Or artificially inflates it for attractions not designed for it or where it’s not needed.

There’s a reason legacy FP was removed from the HM.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Ok, that simple comment is the most intriguing in this (perpetual) FP+ conversation. Do we have (publicly shareable) percentages of guests who just forego entirely? Or do you at least have a sense of where that number sits, @marni1971 ?

There are plenty of people who even though they know in advance they are going to a theme park, don't feel like it should be a 60 day plus out chore. Probably at about 8 to 12 percent of the guests.(I base this on my time as a travel agent for Disney) Then you also have guests who find out what it is when they get there or shortly before and treat it more like the original Fastpass system, but of course by then or shortly before they are not choosing their interests and just selecting more or less what is available to them.
 
Last edited:

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
Ok, that simple comment is the most intriguing in this (perpetual) FP+ conversation. Do we have (publicly shareable) percentages of guests who just forego entirely? Or do you at least have a sense of where that number sits, @marni1971 ?
It’s lower than 20%. Some who don’t need it, mostly those who can’t understand or feel they’re unable to use it.
 

Purduevian

Well-Known Member
It’s lower than 20%. Some who don’t need it, mostly those who can’t understand or feel they’re unable to use it.

Went to WDW with a family who hadn't been in 10 years. After our first fastpass the father (whom paid for it all) pulled me aside and asked how much extra he paid for us all to skip the line on the ride. So there seems to be a decent percentage (this family travels a lot and loves the Disney Cruise Line) that don't understand what it is and that it's free.

Same trip, heard a comment from standby as we passed by in standby "I hate that they let rich people cut".
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom