Mickey and Minnie’s Runaway Railway - Disneyland

DisneyLostBoy03

Active Member
Ahhh ok I for some reason thought you said it as in “watch out for Detination D, wink wink.” As in you had insider knowledge of the announcement itself.
Same. I thought that too. Oh well. Still hoping for some more new behind the scenes on this attraction. Just hope one day the attraction will come to Disneyland.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
...no sillier than a statue of a man holding hands with one...
California-Disneyland-Walt-Disney-Mickey-Mouse-Partners-Statue-1440x954.jpg
That's different. He actually created the Mouse. Random "D"-list celebrity had nothing to do with it.
 

Curious Constance

Well-Known Member
Maybe there are, but I'm not seeing that in Fortnite or Call of Duty. If there are video games out there that do educate, culturally enrich, and intelligent, please let me know because I don't think they exist.

I don't know that I'd call it art, but Fortnite is a lot of fun. I can't play myself (I can't manage to walk and look around at the same time), but I help my ten year old manage his challenges so he can get to Tier 100 and get earn a silly character. I think, generally, it's enough for a video game to just be fun.
 

Rich T

Well-Known Member
Maybe there are, but I'm not seeing that in Fortnite or Call of Duty. If there are video games out there that do educate, culturally enrich, and intelligent, please let me know because I don't think they exist.
TROR, again-- There are games of every genre and type. They're right out there for you to discover (hint: most great, clever, non-violent games are on Nintendo systems.).

I don't play graphically violent games; I prefer the imaginative worlds of Nintendo and the games that play with interactions with art and music.

Nintendo's amazing Mario Kart 8 Deluxe is as much fun as Space Mountain--and every round is new and unpredictable.

King K. Rool was just announced as a new playable character for Nintendo's upcoming Smash Brothers Ultimate this morning. To a non-game fan this means nothing. To Nintendo fans like myself, this was actually more exciting than the announcement of Galaxy's Edge. :D

There's a whole world of great games out there bursting with fun and imagination as well as fantastic music and animation. It's probably not something you'd be interested in (if you were, you'd probably have gotten into it by now), but the gaming world is just going to keep expanding and--fortunately--there are companies like Nintendo who are the Disneys and Willy Wonkas of a vast, varied medium that the mainstream media usually only sees as Call of Duty and Fortnite.
Krool.jpg

:D
 

VJ

Well-Known Member
Isn't a little silly for grown people to be wishing a cartoon mouse happy birthday?
Thing is, Mickey is much more than a "cartoon mouse", and he definitely meant more than that to Walt.

“Mickey Mouse is, to me, a symbol of independence. He was a means to an end. He popped out of my mind onto a drawing pad 20 years ago on a train ride from Manhattan to Hollywood at a time when business fortunes of my brother Roy and myself were at lowest ebb and disaster seemed right around the corner. Born of necessity, the little fellow literally freed us of immediate worry. He provided the means for expanding our organization to its present dimensions and for extending the medium of cartoon animation towards new entertainment levels. He spelled production liberation for us.” – Walt Disney

“The life and ventures of Mickey Mouse have been closely bound up with my own personal and professional life. It is understandable that I should have sentimental attachment for the little personage who played so big a part in the course of Disney Productions and has been so happily accepted as an amusing friend wherever films are shown around the world. He still speaks for me and I still speak for him.” – Walt Disney
 
Last edited:

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
Thing is, Mickey is much more than a "cartoon mouse", and he definitely meant more than that to Walt.

“Mickey Mouse is, to me, a symbol of independence. He was a means to an end. He popped out of my mind onto a drawing pad 20 years ago on a train ride from Manhattan to Hollywood at a time when business fortunes of my brother Roy and myself were at lowest ebb and disaster seemed right around the corner. Born of necessity, the little fellow literally freed us of immediate worry. He provided the means for expanding our organization to its present dimensions and for extending the medium cartoon animation towards new entertainment levels. He spelled production liberation for us.” – Walt Disney

“The life and ventures of Mickey Mouse have been closely bound up with my own personal and professional life. It is understandable that I should have sentimental attachment for the little personage who played so big a part in the course of Disney Productions and has been so happily accepted as an amusing friend wherever films are shown around the world. He still speaks for me and I still speak for him.” – Walt Disney
It might have been that to Walt but to the rest of the world Mickey is just a cartoon character and symbol of a gigantic corporation that's revenue is larger than most of the world's countries national product. I see no reason to worship the Mouse.
 

Hatbox Ghostbuster

Well-Known Member
It might have been that to Walt but to the rest of the world Mickey is just a cartoon character and symbol of a gigantic corporation that's revenue is larger than most of the world's countries national product. I see no reason to worship the Mouse.
In all likelihood, there'd be no Disneyland today if not for the success of Mickey Mouse...so...yeah, not really sure how you can classify him as "just a cartoon character".
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
In all likelihood, there'd be no Disneyland today if not for the success of Mickey Mouse...so...yeah, not really sure how you can classify him as "just a cartoon character".
Not necessarily. They have nothing to do with one another except marketing. If Disney didn't create Disneyland some other company would have taken the risk. Otherwise we would never know what we missed.

Don't make me get out the Doc Brown chalk board.


.aspx
 

Hatbox Ghostbuster

Well-Known Member
Not necessarily. They have nothing to do with one another except marketing. If Disney didn't create Disneyland some other company would have taken the risk. Otherwise we would never know what we missed.

Don't make me get out the Doc Brown chalk board.
I'm more referring to the success of Mickey cartoons, merch, etc. that allowed Walt to continue doing what he wanted, eventually creating Disneyland.

What's the old famous Walt Disney line.....oh yeah.
Screen Shot 2018-08-08 at 1.29.20 PM.png
 

Rich T

Well-Known Member
Not necessarily. They have nothing to do with one another except marketing. If Disney didn't create Disneyland some other company would have taken the risk. Otherwise we would never know what we missed.

Don't make me get out the Doc Brown chalk board.


.aspx
If Disney didn't create Disneyland, there'd be no Disneyland. There'd be other theme parks, but I doubt any would have the emotional impact on a fanbase that grew up on a library of wonderful family films. The storytelling and placemaking most likely would be nowhere near as effective, and it would most likely have been more like Universal Studios or Phantasialand.

Disneyland was right-time, right-place, right-artists lightning in a bottle.
 
Last edited:

TROR

Well-Known Member
If Disney didn't create Disneyland, there'd be no Disneyland. There'd be other theme parks, but I doubt any would have the emotional impact on a fanbase that grew up on a library of wonderful family films. The storytelling and placemaking most likely would be nowhere near as effective, and it would most likely have been more like Universal Studios or Phantasialand.

Disneyland was right-time, right-place lightning in a bottle.
Something as grand as Disneyland could easily be recreated with enough of a budget.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
If Disney didn't create Disneyland, there'd be no Disneyland. There'd be other theme parks, but I doubt any would have the emotional impact on a fanbase that grew up on a library of wonderful family films. The storytelling and placemaking most likely would be nowhere near as effective, and it would most likely have been more like Universal Studios or Phantasialand.

Disneyland was right-time, right-place, right-artists lightning in a bottle.
There were competitors out there. Walter Knott had the same idea as Walt Disney but didn't have the budget but would have eventually gotten there. Other parks where on the right track. The rise of the middle class suburbia is what made the modern theme park popular idea.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom